Ernesto Escobedo and Roberto Cid Subervi will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 6:30 pm on STADIUM 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ernesto Escobedo who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ernesto Escobedo is the pick to win this match.
Ernesto Escobedo -> 1.22
Roberto Cid Subervi -> 4.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ernesto Escobedo vs. Roberto Cid Subervi
There is no head to head record between Ernesto Escobedo and Roberto Cid Subervi since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Ernesto Escobedo
Ranked no. 181, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Govind Nanda 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, Escobedo had a good straight sets win against Nanda (6-1 6-4). During the match, Escobedo scored 58 points vs Nanda’s 35. Escobedo was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Escobedo made 6 aces and he was extremely steady in conceding no double faults. Ernesto Escobedo was extremely efficient on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ernesto broke Nanda 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Escobedo has a winning match record in the last 8 years having won 57% of his matches (219-163). 9-5 on hard in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Escobedo has an aggregate161-105 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Ernesto has a compiled 19-16 win-loss record in 2021, 9-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament once in 2016. See his history.
Roberto Cid Subervi
Ranked no. 250, the Dominican got to the 2nd round after defeating Mikael Torpegaard 3-6 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round against Torpegaard, Roberto recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-2). During the match Cid scored 90 points vs Torpegaard’s 83. Cid was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Cid managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Roberto Cid Subervi lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Cid put 60% of his first serves in, winning 65% (30/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. Cid broke Torpegaard 7 times after converting 54% of his break points (7/13).
The Dominican’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Orlando Challenger.
Roberto has an overall 10-17 win-loss record in 2021, 6-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Escobedo | Cid |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 27 |
| Pts | 58-35 | 90-83 |
| Total Points | 93 | 173 |
| Winners | 30 | 30 |
| %Winners | 52% | 33% |
Both Escobedo and Cid played 1 match. At the moment, Roberto Cid Subervi dropped 1 set while Ernesto Escobedo hasn’t conceded a set so far. Escobedo has played 1 set(s) less than Cid (2 vs 3). Therefore, Escobedo played 10 games less than Cid. Escobedo scored 30 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, The Dominican struck 30 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Escobedo | Cid |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 3 |
| 1st in | 35/48 | 46/77 |
| %1st in | 73% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 30/46 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 13/31 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 42% |
Escobedo bagged 6 aces . Cid blasted 3 aces . Escobedo won 86% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Cid won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Escobedo | Cid |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 7 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 60% | 54% |
| Conceded | 0 | 11 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 55% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Ernesto pretty solid on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. Roberto broke his opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Roberto conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded.
| Escobedo | |||
| R1 Nanda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-35 | 58-35 | |
| Total points | 93 | 93 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 52% | 52% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 35/48 | 35/48 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 30/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Cid | |||
| R1 Torpegaard |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 90-83 | 90-83 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 46/77 | 46/77 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/31 | 13/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 42% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWWWW
LLWWLWLLWL Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Liam DraxlDraxl (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Edan LeshemLeshem (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Govind NandaNanda (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Darian KingKing – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Nicolas MejiaMejia (7-63 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-63 7-66) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Stefan DostanicDostanic (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Christian HarrisonHarrison (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Tatsuma ItoIto (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Nicolas MejiaMejia (7-6(3) 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darian KingKing – Maxime CressyCressy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Roberto CidCid (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-1) – H2H and prediction
