Jenson Brooksby and Ulises Blanch will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Lexington Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on STADIUM 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jenson Brooksby who should win in 2 sets.
Jenson Brooksby -> 1.196
Ulises Blanch -> 4.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jenson Brooksby vs. Ulises Blanch
This will be the 2nd time that Jenson Brooksby and Ulises Blanch clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Blanch (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they squared off, Blanch won 4-6 6-2 6-2 in the 1st round in the Indian Wells Challenger back in 2019.
Jenson Brooksby
Ranked no. 129, the American reached the 2nd round after beating Liam Draxl 6-3 6-3.
In the 1st round, Brooksby had a good straight sets win against Draxl (6-3 6-3). During the match, Brooksby scored 68 points vs Draxl’s 44. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Brooksby scored 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Jenson Brooksby was exceptionally effective on serve to win 88% (29/33) of his 1st serve and 67% (8/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jenson broke Draxl 3 times after converting 23% of his break points (3/13).
Brooksby has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 68% of his matches (106-50). 17-3 on hard in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Brooksby has an overall69-35 match record in the last 5 years on hard.
Brooksby’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Potchefstroom 2 Challenger,the Cleveland Challenger,the Orlando Challenger,the Tallahassee Challenger and Newport.
The American has a composed 33-6 win-loss record in 2021, 17-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lexington Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Ulises Blanch
Ranked no. 249, Blanch got to the 2nd round after defeating Shuichi Sekiguchi 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Ulises had a good straight sets win against Sekiguchi (6-3 6-4). During the match Blanch scored 68 points vs Sekiguchi’s 47. Ulises was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Blanch struck 13 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Ulises Blanch was extremely efficient on serve to win 85% (28/33) of his 1st serve and 65% (15/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ulises was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Sekiguchi twice.
The American has a compiled 15-15 win-loss record in 2021, 10-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Brooksby | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 19 |
| Pts | 68-44 | 68-47 |
| Total Points | 112 | 115 |
| Winners | 29 | 28 |
| %Winners | 43% | 41% |
Both Brooksby and Blanch played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Brooksby and Blanch have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Brooksby played 1 game less than Blanch. Jenson scored 29 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Ulises scored 28 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Brooksby | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 13 |
| 1st in | 33/45 | 33/56 |
| %1st in | 73% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 29/33 | 28/33 |
| %1st pts | 88% | 85% |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 15/23 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 65% |
Brooksby scored 2 aces . Blanch made 13 aces . Brooksby won 88% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Blanch won 85% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Brooksby | Blanch |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/13 | 2/2 |
| % Converted | 23% | 100% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | NAN% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 23% conversion rate. Brooksby had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. The American broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Blanch was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Brooksby | |||
| R1 Draxl | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 68-44 | 68-44 | |
| Total points | 112 | 112 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 33/45 | 33/45 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 29/33 | 29/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/12 | 8/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/13 | 3/13 | |
| Converted % | 23% | 23% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Blanch | |||
| R1 Sekiguchi | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 68-47 | 68-47 | |
| Total points | 115 | 115 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 13 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/56 | 33/56 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 28/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/23 | 15/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Lexington Challenger
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Edan LeshemLeshem (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Govind NandaNanda (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Brayden SchnurSchnur (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Darian KingKing – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Nicolas MejiaMejia (7-63 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-63 7-66) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Liam DraxlDraxl (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Christian HarrisonHarrison (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Tatsuma ItoIto (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Stefan DostanicDostanic (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Nicolas MejiaMejia (7-6(3) 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio GomezGomez – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darian KingKing – Maxime CressyCressy (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Roberto CidCid (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sasi Kumar MukundKumar Mukund – Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Ulises BlanchBlanch (0-1) – H2H and prediction