Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jamie Loeb who should win in 2 sets.
Jamie Loeb -> 1.47
Katrina Scott -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jamie Loeb vs. Katrina Scott
There is no head to head record between Jamie Loeb and Katrina Scott since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jamie Loeb
Ranked no. 229, the American reached the 2nd round after defeating Whitney Osuigwe 6-3 7-63.
In the 1st round, Loeb had a good straight sets win against Osuigwe (6-3 7-63). During the match, Loeb scored 82 points vs Osuigwe’s 63. Jamie was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Regarding the service games, Loeb scored just 1 ace during the match and she committed only 3 double faults. Jamie Loeb lost the serve 5 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Loeb put 49% of her first serves in, winning 62% (24/39) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (18/40) on the 2nd serve. Jamie broke Osuigwe 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).
Loeb has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 56% of her matches (221-176). 12-10 on clay in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Loeb has a compiled53-48 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Jamie’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the W25 Pelham.
Loeb has an overall 15-15 win-loss record in 2021, 12-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charleston
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Katrina Scott
Ranked no. 384 (career-high), Scott reached the 2nd round after beating Madison Brengle 6-0 6-3.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Brengle (6-0 6-3). During the match Scott scored 58 points vs Brengle’s 34. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
About the serving games, Scott struck 4 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Katrina Scott lost the serve once and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Scott put 57% of her first serves in, winning 69% (20/29) of the points behind her 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. Katrina broke Brengle 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Scott’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the W25 Evansville.
Katrina has an overall 7-9 win-loss record in 2021, 1-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Loeb | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 15 |
| Pts | 82-63 | 58-34 |
| Total Points | 145 | 92 |
| Winners | 24 | 20 |
| %Winners | 29% | 34% |
Both Loeb and Scott played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Loeb and Scott have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Loeb played 7 games more than Scott. Jamie scored 24 winners (29% of the total points). On the other side, Katrina recorded 20 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Loeb | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 4 |
| 1st in | 39/79 | 29/51 |
| %1st in | 49% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 24/39 | 20/29 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 18/40 | 13/22 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 59% |
Loeb made 1 ace . Scott also struck 4 aces . Loeb won 62% points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Scott won 69% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Loeb | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 5 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 5/8 |
| % Converted | 58% | 63% |
| Conceded | 11 | 6 |
| Saved | 6 | 5 |
| % Saved | 55% | 83% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
The American broke her opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded. The American broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve once and she saved 83% of the break points that she conceded.
| Loeb | |||
| R1 Osuigwe | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 82-63 | 82-63 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 29% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 39/79 | 39/79 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 24/39 | 24/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/40 | 18/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 6/11 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 55% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Scott | |||
| R1 Brengle | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 58-34 | 58-34 | |
| Total points | 92 | 92 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 29/51 | 29/51 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 20/29 | 20/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Lenny HampelHampel – Dragos DimaDima (5-7 6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Artem SmirnovSmirnov – Tomislav BrkicBrkic (6-1 7-60) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Pawel CiasCias (0-6 6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Peter NagyNagy – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-0 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sumit NagalNagal – Marcin GawronGawron (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- En Shuo LiangShuo Liang – Allie KiickKiick (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maddison InglisInglis – Kateryna BondarenkoBondarenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexa GlatchGlatch – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Na-Lae HanHan – Hanna ChangChang (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tori KinardKinard – Varvara LepchenkoLepchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aldila SutjiadiSutjiadi – Maria MateasMateas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca MarinoMarino – Lauren DavisDavis (0-0) – H2H and prediction