Benjamin Bonzi and Matteo Viola will square off in the 2nd round of the Segovia Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on PISTA CENTRAL. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Benjamin Bonzi who should win in 2 sets.
Benjamin Bonzi -> 1.33
Matteo Viola -> 3.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Benjamin Bonzi vs. Matteo Viola
This will be the 2nd time that Benjamin Bonzi and Matteo Viola square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Viola (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Viola won 4-6 7-5 6-3 in the 1st round in the Lille Challenger back in 2019.
Benjamin Bonzi
Ranked no. 111, the French player reached the 2nd round after defeating Adrian Andreev 6-72 6-4 7-63.
In the 1st round against Andreev, Benjamin recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 6-4 7-63). During the match, Bonzi scored 133 points vs Andreev’s 120. Bonzi was very aggressive to blast 47 winners.
Talking about the service games, Bonzi recorded 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Benjamin Bonzi lost the serve 4 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Bonzi put 60% of his first serves in, winning 65% (47/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (26/48) on the 2nd serve. Bonzi broke Andreev 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Bonzi has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 63% of his matches (234-140). 8-3 on hard in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Bonzi has an aggregate65-26 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The French player best result of the year was getting to the final in the Istanbul Challenger,the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger and the Ostrava Challenger.
Bonzi has an overall 36-19 win-loss record in 2021, 8-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Segovia Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2017. See his history.
Matteo Viola
Ranked no. 264, Viola got to the 2nd round after beating Mirza Basic 6-4 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Basic (6-4 6-1). During the match Viola scored 68 points vs Basic’s 49. Viola was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Viola bagged 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Matteo Viola lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Viola put 63% of his first serves in, winning 65% (26/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (12/23) on the 2nd serve. Viola broke Basic 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Viola has an aggregate 14-20 win-loss record in 2021, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bonzi | Viola |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 17 |
| Pts | 133-120 | 68-49 |
| Total Points | 253 | 117 |
| Winners | 47 | 26 |
| %Winners | 35% | 38% |
Both Bonzi and Viola played 1 match. At the moment, Benjamin Bonzi dropped 1 set while Matteo Viola hasn’t dropped a set so far. Bonzi has played 1 set more than Viola (3 vs 2). Therefore, Bonzi played 19 games more than Viola. Benjamin scored 47 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Matteo scored 26 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bonzi | Viola |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 2 |
| 1st in | 72/120 | 40/63 |
| %1st in | 60% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 47/72 | 26/40 |
| %1st pts | 65% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 26/48 | 12/23 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 52% |
Bonzi managed to score 6 aces . Viola fired 2 aces . Bonzi won 65% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Viola won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bonzi | Viola |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 5 |
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/10 |
| % Converted | 33% | 50% |
| Conceded | 12 | 5 |
| Saved | 8 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Bonzi broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. Benjamin dropped his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Viola broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Italian conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Bonzi | |||
| R1 Andreev | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-72 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 36 | |
| pts | 133-120 | 133-120 | |
| Total points | 253 | 253 | |
| Winners | 47 | 47 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 72/120 | 72/120 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 47/72 | 47/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/48 | 26/48 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Viola | |||
| R1 Basic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-49 | 68-49 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 40/63 | 40/63 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 26/40 | 26/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/23 | 12/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 52% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores in Segovia Challenger
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (6-4 0-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Malek JaziriJaziri – Jc AragoneAragone (6-75 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Carlos Gimeno ValeroGimeno Valero – Quentin HalysHalys (6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili – Igor SijslingSijsling (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Roberto Ortega-OlmedoOrtega-Olmedo (3-6 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-76 7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Feliciano LopezLopez – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (6-4 7-62) – See score progression
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Luca VanniVanni (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Goncalo OliveiraOliveira (3-6 7-66 6-1) – See score progression
- Matteo ViolaViola – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Pavel KotovKotov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Johannes HaerteisHaerteis (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Julio Cesar PorrasCesar Porras – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (7-66 6-2) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Adrian AndreevAndreev (6-72 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Feliciano LopezLopez – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo ViolaViola – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Carlos Gimeno ValeroGimeno Valero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven – Malek JaziriJaziri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Moro CanasMoro Canas – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-0) – H2H and prediction