Elmar Ejupovic and David Poljak will clash against each other in the 1st round of the Poznan Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 6:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elmar Ejupovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elmar Ejupovic is the pick to win this match.
Elmar Ejupovic -> 1.5
David Poljak -> 2.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Elmar Ejupovic vs. David Poljak
There is no head to head record between Elmar Ejupovic and David Poljak since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Elmar Ejupovic
Ranked no. 421, Elmar reached the 1st round after beating Alexey Vatutin 4-6 6-2 6-3 and Christopher Heyman 7-614 6-2.
In the qualifications, Ejupovic had a good straight sets win against Heyman (7-614 6-2). During the match, Ejupovic scored 94 points vs Heyman’s 78. Elmar was very aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ejupovic fired 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Elmar Ejupovic lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Ejupovic put 58% of his first serves in, winning 70% (32/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the 2nd serve. Ejupovic broke Heyman 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Bosnian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 1 set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Ejupovic has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 59% of his matches (258-176). 14-8 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Ejupovic has an aggregate110-87 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Ejupovic’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Grenoble,M25 Trimbach and M15 Troisdorf.
Ejupovic has a compiled 22-10 win-loss record in 2021, 14-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Ejupovic has never competed in this tournament before.
David Poljak
Ranked no. 461, David got to the 1st round after beating Thomaz Bellucci 4-6 6-3 6-1 and Lucas Gerch 7-5 1-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Czech defeated Gerch (7-5 1-6 6-4). During the match Poljak scored 114 points vs Gerch’s 111. David was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
About the serving games, Poljak managed to score 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. David Poljak lost the serve 6 times and he saved 15 break points. Furthermore, Poljak put 63% of his first serves in, winning 60% (43/72) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (18/42) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Gerch 6 times after converting 43% of his break points (6/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Poljak started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
David’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in M15 Sharm El Sheikh.
Poljak has an overall 21-16 win-loss record in 2021, 7-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ejupovic | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 55 |
| Pts | 181-157 | 220-199 |
| Total Points | 338 | 419 |
| Winners | 60 | 83 |
| %Winners | 33% | 38% |
Both Ejupovic and Poljak played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Elmar Ejupovic conceded 1 set, while David Poljak dropped 2 sets. Ejupovic has played 1 set(s) less than Poljak (5 vs 6). Therefore, Ejupovic played 7 games less than Poljak. The Bosnian scored 60 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Czech scored 83 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ejupovic | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 4 |
| 1st in | 94/162 | 125/204 |
| %1st in | 58% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 60/94 | 83/125 |
| %1st pts | 64% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 41/68 | 36/79 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 46% |
Ejupovic blasted 13 aces (6.5 per match). Poljak bagged 8 aces (4 per match). Ejupovic won 64% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Poljak won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ejupovic | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 11 |
| Converted | 9/25 | 11/26 |
| % Converted | 36% | 42% |
| Conceded | 11 | 29 |
| Saved | 6 | 21 |
| % Saved | 55% | 72% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 8 |
Elmar broke his opponents 9 times with a 36% conversion rate. Elmar surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded. David broke his opponents 11 times with a 42% conversion rate. David conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 72% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ejupovic | ||||
| Q1 Vatutin |
Q3 Heyman |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | 7-614 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 21 | 48 | |
| pts | 87-79 | 94-78 | 181-157 | |
| Total points | 166 | 172 | 338 | |
| Winners | 28 | 32 | 60 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 34% | 33% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/82 | 46/80 | 94/162 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 28/48 | 32/46 | 60/94 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 70% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/34 | 20/34 | 41/68 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 59% | 60% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 3/10 | 9/25 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 30% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3/4 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 75% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Poljak | ||||
| Q1 Bellucci |
Q3 Gerch |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 29 | 55 | |
| pts | 106-88 | 114-111 | 220-199 | |
| Total points | 194 | 225 | 419 | |
| Winners | 40 | 43 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 53/90 | 72/114 | 125/204 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 63% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 40/53 | 43/72 | 83/125 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 60% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/37 | 18/42 | 36/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 43% | 46% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 6/14 | 11/26 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 43% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 21 | 29 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 15/21 | 21 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 71% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 6 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWLWL
LLWWLWLLLW Tennis Scores in Poznan Challenger
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Aleksander OrlikowskiOrlikowski (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miljan ZekicZekic – Gastao EliasElias (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Tobias KamkeKamke (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – David PoljakPoljak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Joao DominguesDomingues (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
