Christopher Heyman and Elmar Ejupovic will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Poznan Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Elmar Ejupovic who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Elmar Ejupovic is the pick to win this match.
Elmar Ejupovic -> 1.6
Christopher Heyman -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Christopher Heyman vs. Elmar Ejupovic
This will be the 3rd time that Christopher Heyman and Elmar Ejupovic face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Heyman (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they played, Heyman won 7-5 7-6(4) in the 2nd round in Germany F2 (Nussloch) back in 2018.
Christopher Heyman
Ranked no. 411,he will start his run in the Poznan Challenger after he played his last match in the Poznan Challenger where he overcame 6-3 6-4 to Kasnikowski in the qualifications on the 25th of July.
Christopher has a composed 16-13 win-loss record in 2021, 14-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
The Belgian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Antalya.
Talking about his overall career, The Belgian has an overall 227-110 record. He has a positive 97-51 record on clay.
Previously in the Poznan Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2019. See his history.
Elmar Ejupovic
Ranked no. 418, the Bosnian reached the qualifications after defeating Alexey Vatutin 4-6 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications against Vatutin, Elmar recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-3). During the match Ejupovic scored 87 points vs Vatutin’s 79. The Bosnian was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Ejupovic fired 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Elmar Ejupovic lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Ejupovic put 59% of his first serves in, winning 58% (28/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (21/34) on the 2nd serve. Elmar broke Vatutin 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Elmar’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Grenoble,M25 Trimbach and M15 Troisdorf.
Elmar has an overall 21-10 win-loss record in 2021, 13-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Heyman | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 27 |
| Pts | 75-65 | 87-79 |
| Total Points | 140 | 166 |
| Winners | 35 | 28 |
| %Winners | 47% | 32% |
Both Heyman and Ejupovic played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Elmar Ejupovic surrendered 1 set while Christopher Heyman hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Heyman has played 1 set(s) less than Ejupovic (2 vs 3). Therefore, Heyman played 8 games less than Ejupovic. The Belgian scored 35 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Elmar struck 28 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Heyman | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 6 |
| 1st in | 52/69 | 48/82 |
| %1st in | 75% | 59% |
| 1st pts | 35/52 | 28/48 |
| %1st pts | 67% | 58% |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 21/34 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 62% |
Heyman struck 3 aces . Ejupovic made 6 aces . Heyman won 67% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Ejupovic won 58% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Heyman | Ejupovic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 6 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 6/15 |
| % Converted | 36% | 40% |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 71% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
The Belgian broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Heyman conceded his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Elmar broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Ejupovic conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Heyman | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | – | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | NAN% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | NAN% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Ejupovic | |||
| Q1 Vatutin |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 87-79 | 87-79 | |
| Total points | 166 | 166 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 48/82 | 48/82 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 28/48 | 28/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/34 | 21/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | INF% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLWWLWL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Aleksandar VukicVukic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen – Nicolas KickerKicker (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Tobias KamkeKamke (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo MenaMena – Jesper De JongDe Jong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Miljan ZekicZekic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Christopher HeymanHeyman (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- David PoljakPoljak – Lucas GerchGerch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Dmitry PopkoPopko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri LeheckaLehecka – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MichalskiMichalski – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
