Altug Celikbilek and Cem Ilkel will fight against each other in the final of the Pozoblanco Challenger for the 7th time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 9:00 pm on CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Altug Celikbilek who should win in 3 sets.
Altug Celikbilek -> 1.76
Cem Ilkel -> 2.06
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Altug Celikbilek vs. Cem Ilkel
This will be the 7th time that Altug Celikbilek and Cem Ilkel fight against each other. The head to head is 3-3 (see full H2H stats), 3-2 on hard.
The last time that they played, Celikbilek won 6-3 6-4 in the semifinal in Turkey F7 (Antalya) back in 2017.
Altug Celikbilek
Ranked no. 203, the Turk reached the final after beating Skander Mansouri 6-73 6-1 7-64, Teimuraz Gabashvili 5-7 6-3 6-4, Adrian Menendez-Maceiras 6-3 6-0 and Gregoire Barrere 4-6 6-3 1-1 ret..
In the semifinal against Barrere, Altug had an good comeback after recovering from a 2-sets down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 1-1 ret.).-65) than Barrere. In fact, the world no. 203 won 65 points vs Barrere’s. That means that Celikbilek was more focused during the important points. Celikbilek was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Celikbilek recorded 13 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Altug Celikbilek lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Celikbilek put 51% of his first serves in, winning 88% (28/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (12/31) on the 2nd serve. The Turk broke Barrere twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Turk started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 2 set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Celikbilek has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 61% of his matches (245-159). 16-4 on hard in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Celikbilek has an overall186-109 win-loss record in the last 7 years on hard.
Altug’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the St. Petersburg 1 Challenger and the Porto Challenger.
Altug has a composed 31-13 win-loss record in 2021, 16-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pozoblanco Challenger
Celikbilek has never competed in this tournament before.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 209, Cem reached the final after beating Johannes Haerteis 6-2 7-63, Hiroki Moriya 6-3 6-2, Tim Van Rijthoven 7-5 7-65 and Michael Geerts 6-2 6-73 6-4.
In the semifinal, Cem defeated Geerts (6-2 6-73 6-4). During the match Ilkel scored 114 points vs Geerts’s 96. Cem was quite aggressive to blast 44 winners.
About the serving games, Ilkel bagged 13 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Cem Ilkel was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 88% (44/50) of his 1st serve and 57% (24/42) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Ilkel broke Geerts 3 times after converting 21% of his break points (3/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cem started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The Turk’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Antalya Challenger,the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger,the Rome 2 Challenger and the Pozoblanco Challenger.
Cem has a compiled 22-17 win-loss record in 2021, 10-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Celikbilek | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 12 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 100 | 94 |
| Pts | 330-275 | 333-272 |
| Total Points | 605 | 605 |
| Winners | 127 | 128 |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% |
Both Celikbilek and Ilkel played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Altug Celikbilek surrendered 3 sets, while Cem Ilkel surrendered 1 set. Celikbilek has played 3 sets more than Ilkel (12 vs 9). Therefore, Celikbilek played 6 games more than Ilkel. The Turk scored 127 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Turk bagged 128 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Celikbilek | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 37 | 28 |
| Avg per match | 9.3 | 7 |
| 1st in | 156/290 | 159/288 |
| %1st in | 54% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 127/156 | 128/159 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 79/134 | 82/129 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 64% |
Celikbilek managed to score 37 aces (9.3 per match). Ilkel scored 28 aces (7 per match). Celikbilek won 81% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Ilkel won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Celikbilek | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 10 |
| Converted | 12/30 | 10/31 |
| % Converted | 40% | 32% |
| Conceded | 12 | 10 |
| Saved | 7 | 9 |
| % Saved | 58% | 90% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
The Turk broke his opponents 12 times with a 40% conversion rate. Altug lost his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Cem broke his opponents 10 times with a 32% conversion rate. The Turk conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.
| Celikbilek | ||||||
| R1 Mansouri | R2 Gabashvili | 1/4 Menendez-Maceiras | 1/2 Barrere | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-73 6-1 7-64 | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | 6-3 6-0 | 4-6 6-3 1-1 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 33 | 31 | 15 | 21 | 100 | |
| pts | 106-87 | 102-87 | 57-33 | 65-68 | 330-275 | |
| Total points | 193 | 189 | 90 | 133 | 605 | |
| Winners | 51 | 30 | 18 | 28 | 127 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 29% | 32% | 43% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 12 | 4 | 8 | 13 | 37 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 61/99 | 41/85 | 22/43 | 32/63 | 156/290 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 48% | 51% | 51% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 51/61 | 30/41 | 18/22 | 28/32 | 127/156 | |
| % 1st pts | 84% | 73% | 82% | 88% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/38 | 32/44 | 14/21 | 12/31 | 79/134 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 73% | 67% | 39% | 59% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | 4/8 | 2/8 | 12/30 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | 50% | 25% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 2/4 | 0/0 | 1/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 50% | – | 33% | 41% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
| Ilkel | ||||||
| R1 Haerteis | R2 Moriya | 1/4 Van Rijthoven | 1/2 Geerts | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-63 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 7-65 | 6-2 6-73 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 17 | 25 | 31 | 94 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 59-33 | 87-81 | 114-96 | 333-272 | |
| Total points | 135 | 92 | 168 | 210 | 605 | |
| Winners | 28 | 21 | 35 | 44 | 128 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 36% | 40% | 39% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 39/65 | 24/43 | 46/88 | 50/92 | 159/288 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 56% | 52% | 54% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 28/39 | 21/24 | 35/46 | 44/50 | 128/159 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 88% | 76% | 88% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 15/19 | 26/42 | 24/42 | 82/129 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 79% | 62% | 57% | 64% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/4 | 1/4 | 3/14 | 10/31 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 75% | 25% | 21% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 5/5 | 4/4 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 100% | 100% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (3-3) – H2H and prediction