Cem Ilkel and Michael Geerts will square off in the semifinal of the Pozoblanco Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 9:30 pm on PISTA 2. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cem Ilkel who should win in 3 sets.
Cem Ilkel -> 1.57
Michael Geerts -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Cem Ilkel vs. Michael Geerts
This will be the 2nd time that Cem Ilkel and Michael Geerts play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Ilkel (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Ilkel won 6-1 6-2 in the 1st round in Turkey F5 back in 1970.
Cem Ilkel
Ranked no. 209, Ilkel got to the semifinal after defeating Johannes Haerteis 6-2 7-63, Hiroki Moriya 6-3 6-2 and Tim Van Rijthoven 7-5 7-65.
In the quarter, Ilkel had a good straight sets win against Van Rijthoven (7-5 7-65). During the match, Ilkel scored 87 points vs Van Rijthoven’s 81. Cem was pretty aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ilkel made 5 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Cem Ilkel was extremely efficient on serve to win 76% (35/46) of his 1st serve and 62% (26/42) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Turk broke Van Rijthoven once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cem started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Ilkel has a winning win-loss record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (302-217). 9-4 on hard in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Ilkel has an overall216-118 match record in the last 8 years on hard.
Ilkel’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Antalya Challenger,the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger and the Rome 2 Challenger.
Ilkel has an aggregate 21-17 win-loss record in 2021, 9-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Pozoblanco Challenger
Ilkel has never competed in this tournament before.
Michael Geerts
Ranked no. 348, the Belgian got to the semifinal after beating Mark Vervoort 6-1 6-0, Diego Hidalgo 7-64 6-3, Kaichi Uchida 6-1 6-2, Benjamin Bonzi 7-63 6-2 and Emilio Nava 7-62 7-63.
In the quarter, The Belgian had a good straight sets win against Nava (7-62 7-63). During the match Geerts scored 97 points vs Nava’s 86. The Belgian was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
About the serving games, Geerts bagged 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Michael Geerts was extremely efficient on serve to win 75% (40/53) of his 1st serve and 61% (14/23) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Geerts broke Nava once after converting 25% of his break points (1/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Belgian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this tournament to conquer 58% of the points he played.
Geerts’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M15 Troisdorf.
Geerts has an overall 22-15 win-loss record in 2021, 7-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ilkel | Geerts |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 5 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 63 | 97 |
| Pts | 219-176 | 342-249 |
| Total Points | 395 | 591 |
| Winners | 84 | 146 |
| %Winners | 38% | 43% |
Ilkel played 3 matches while Geerts competed in 5 matches. Geerts started his run from the qualifications while Ilkel had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Ilkel has played 4 set(s) less than Geerts (6 vs 10). Therefore, Ilkel played 34 games less than Geerts. Cem scored 84 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Michael scored 146 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ilkel | Geerts |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 37 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7.4 |
| 1st in | 109/196 | 182/288 |
| %1st in | 56% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 84/109 | 146/182 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 58/87 | 64/106 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 60% |
Ilkel managed to score 15 aces (5 per match). Geerts managed to score 37 aces (7.4 per match). Ilkel won 77% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Geerts won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 60% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ilkel | Geerts |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 16 |
| Converted | 7/17 | 16/28 |
| % Converted | 41% | 57% |
| Conceded | 6 | 11 |
| Saved | 5 | 8 |
| % Saved | 83% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Cem broke his opponents 7 times with a 41% conversion rate. Cem lost his serve once and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Geerts broke his opponents 16 times with a 57% conversion rate. Michael conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ilkel | |||||
| R1 Haerteis | R2 Moriya | 1/4 Van Rijthoven | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-63 | 6-3 6-2 | 7-5 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 17 | 25 | 63 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 59-33 | 87-81 | 219-176 | |
| Total points | 135 | 92 | 168 | 395 | |
| Winners | 28 | 21 | 35 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 36% | 40% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 9 | 5 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 39/65 | 24/43 | 46/88 | 109/196 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 56% | 52% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 28/39 | 21/24 | 35/46 | 84/109 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 88% | 76% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 15/19 | 26/42 | 58/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 79% | 62% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/4 | 1/4 | 7/17 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 75% | 25% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 100% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Geerts | |||||||
| Q1 Vervoort | Q3 Hidalgo | R1 Uchida | R2 Bonzi | 1/4 Nava | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-0 | 7-64 6-3 | 6-1 6-2 | 7-63 6-2 | 7-62 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 22 | 15 | 21 | 26 | 97 | |
| pts | 51-20 | 69-55 | 54-33 | 71-55 | 97-86 | 342-249 | |
| Total points | 71 | 124 | 87 | 126 | 183 | 591 | |
| Winners | 15 | 35 | 23 | 33 | 40 | 146 | |
| %Winners | 29% | 51% | 43% | 46% | 41% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||||
| Aces | 2 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 37 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 18/29 | 42/68 | 31/52 | 38/63 | 53/76 | 182/288 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | 60% | 60% | 70% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 15/18 | 35/42 | 23/31 | 33/38 | 40/53 | 146/182 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | 74% | 87% | 75% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/11 | 13/26 | 14/21 | 13/25 | 14/23 | 64/106 | |
| % 2nd pts | 91% | 50% | 67% | 52% | 61% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||||||
| Won | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 16 | |
| Converted | 6/13 | 2/2 | 4/4 | 3/5 | 1/4 | 16/28 | |
| Converted % | 46% | 100% | 100% | 60% | 25% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 4/4 | 2/3 | 1/2 | 8 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 100% | 67% | 50% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
Tennis Scores in Pozoblanco Challenger
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Tim Van RijthovenVan Rijthoven (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Federico ZeballosZeballos (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Emilio NavaNava (7-62 7-63) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-1) – H2H and prediction