Botic Van De Zandschulp and Jesper De Jong will fight against each other in the quarter of the Amersfoort Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 3:00 pm on VAN MOSSEL KIA COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.5
Jesper De Jong -> 2.59
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Jesper De Jong
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Jesper De Jong since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 132 (career-high), Botic reached the quarter after defeating Goncalo Oliveira 6-2 6-4 and Mats Moraing 6-3 7-5.
In the 2nd round, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Moraing (6-3 7-5). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 80 points vs Moraing’s 69. Botic was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp scored 5 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 60% of his first serves in, winning 72% (28/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (13/26) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Moraing 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Botic started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid match record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (217-110). 10-5 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has a compiled115-64 match record in the last 7 years on clay.
Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 22-13 win-loss record in 2021, 10-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Amersfoort Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019. See his history.
Jesper De Jong
Ranked no. 263, De Jong got to the quarter after defeating Manuel Guinard 7-65 4-6 7-65 and Mohamed Safwat 2-6 6-1 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Safwat, De Jong recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-1 6-4). During the match De Jong scored 77 points vs Safwat’s 67. Jesper was exceptionally aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about serving, De Jong blasted 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Jesper De Jong lost the serve twice. Furthermore, De Jong put 61% of his first serves in, winning 81% (35/43) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (12/27) on the 2nd serve. Jesper broke Safwat 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
De Jong started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
The Dutch’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Almaty 2 Challenger.
De Jong has an aggregate 16-15 win-loss record in 2021, 12-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 39 | 61 |
| Pts | 147-117 | 202-197 |
| Total Points | 264 | 399 |
| Winners | 54 | 88 |
| %Winners | 37% | 44% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and De Jong played 2 matches. At the moment, Jesper De Jong dropped 2 sets while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 2 set(s) less than De Jong (4 vs 6). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 22 games less than De Jong. Van De Zandschulp scored 54 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch recorded 88 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 6.5 |
| 1st in | 68/117 | 113/185 |
| %1st in | 58% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 54/68 | 88/113 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 24/49 | 30/72 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 42% |
Van De Zandschulp recorded 10 aces (5 per match). De Jong made 13 aces (6.5 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 79% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, De Jong won 78% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 42% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 6 |
| Converted | 9/23 | 6/19 |
| % Converted | 39% | 32% |
| Conceded | 6 | 9 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 6 |
The Dutch broke his opponents 9 times with a 39% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Jesper broke his opponents 6 times with a 32% conversion rate. Jesper conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | ||||
| R1 Oliveira | R2 Moraing | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 21 | 39 | |
| pts | 67-48 | 80-69 | 147-117 | |
| Total points | 115 | 149 | 264 | |
| Winners | 26 | 28 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 35% | 37% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 29/52 | 39/65 | 68/117 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 60% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 26/29 | 28/39 | 54/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 72% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/23 | 13/26 | 24/49 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 50% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 5/15 | 9/23 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 33% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 1/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 33% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| De Jong | ||||
| R1 Guinard | R2 Safwat | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 4-6 7-65 | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 36 | 25 | 61 | |
| pts | 125-130 | 77-67 | 202-197 | |
| Total points | 255 | 144 | 399 | |
| Winners | 53 | 35 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 45% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 6 | 7 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 70/115 | 43/70 | 113/185 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 53/70 | 35/43 | 88/113 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 81% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/45 | 12/27 | 30/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 44% | 42% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Converted | 3/13 | 3/6 | 6/19 | |
| Converted % | 23% | 50% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 0/2 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 0% | 22% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Lukas RosolRosol (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction