Lukas Rosol and Johan Nikles will face off in the 2nd round of the Amersfoort Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:30 pm on VAN MOSSEL KIA COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Lukas Rosol who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Lukas Rosol is the pick to win this match.
Lukas Rosol -> 1.83
Johan Nikles -> 183
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Lukas Rosol vs. Johan Nikles
There is no head to head record between Lukas Rosol and Johan Nikles since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Lukas Rosol
Ranked no. 214, the Czech got to the 2nd round after defeating Vit Kopriva 7-64 6-2.
In the 1st round, Lukas had a good straight sets win against Kopriva (7-64 6-2). During the match, Rosol scored 80 points vs Kopriva’s 69. Lukas was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Rosol managed to score 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Lukas Rosol lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Rosol put 62% of his first serves in, winning 61% (27/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the 2nd serve. The Czech broke Kopriva 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Rosol has a good record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (305-273). 2-8 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Rosol has an overall 137-103 match record in the last years on clay.
Lukas’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in the Cherbourg Challenger.
The Czech has an overall 9-16 win-loss record in 2021, 2-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Amersfoort Challenger
The Czech has never competed in this tournament before.
Johan Nikles
Ranked no. 435 (career-high), the Swiss reached the 2nd round after defeating Dominik Palan 6-4 7-64, Jeremy Jahn 6-2 6-3 and Ryan Nijboer 7-65 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Nijboer (7-65 6-2). During the match Nikles scored 69 points vs Nijboer’s 59. Johan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Nikles was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Johan Nikles lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Nikles put 73% of his first serves in, winning 66% (31/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Nijboer 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
Nikles’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Majadahonda and M15 Genova.
The Swiss has a composed 29-15 win-loss record in 2021, 27-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Rosol | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 61 |
| Pts | 80-69 | 217-174 |
| Total Points | 149 | 391 |
| Winners | 27 | 88 |
| %Winners | 34% | 41% |
Rosol played 1 match while Nikles competed in 3 matches. Nikles started his run from the qualifications while Rosol had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Rosol has played 4 set(s) less than Nikles (2 vs 6). Therefore, Rosol played 40 games less than Nikles. The Czech scored 27 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss bagged 88 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Rosol | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 44/71 | 136/195 |
| %1st in | 62% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 27/44 | 88/136 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 30/59 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 51% |
Rosol scored 4 aces . Nikles made 4 aces (1.3 per match). Rosol won 61% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Nikles won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Rosol | Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/7 | 14/23 |
| % Converted | 57% | 61% |
| Conceded | 9 | 14 |
| Saved | 7 | 6 |
| % Saved | 78% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 8 |
The Czech broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Lukas surrendered his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Nikles broke his opponents 14 times with a 61% conversion rate. Johan conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Rosol | |||
| R1 Kopriva |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 80-69 | 80-69 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/71 | 44/71 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 27/44 | 27/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Nikles | |||||
| Q1 Palan |
Q3 Jahn |
R1 Nijboer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | 6-2 6-3 | 7-65 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 17 | 21 | 61 | |
| pts | 81-70 | 67-45 | 69-59 | 217-174 | |
| Total points | 151 | 112 | 128 | 391 | |
| Winners | 28 | 29 | 31 | 88 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 43% | 45% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 46/70 | 43/61 | 47/64 | 136/195 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 70% | 73% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 28/46 | 29/43 | 31/47 | 88/136 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 67% | 66% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/24 | 6/18 | 7/17 | 30/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 33% | 41% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 6 | 5 | 14 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 6/10 | 5/7 | 14/23 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 60% | 71% | 61% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 2/5 | 3/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 40% | 50% | 123% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Amersfoort Challenger
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Aleksandar VukicVukic (7-5 2-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (2-6 6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jelle SelsSels – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Facundo MenaMena (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Johan NiklesNikles – Lukas RosolRosol (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jesper De JongDe Jong – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
