Jay Clarke and Beibit Zhukayev will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Nur-Sultan 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jay Clarke who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jay Clarke is the pick to win this match.
Jay Clarke -> 1.444
Beibit Zhukayev -> 2.77
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jay Clarke vs. Beibit Zhukayev
There is no head to head record between Jay Clarke and Beibit Zhukayev since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jay Clarke
Ranked no. 243, Jay reached the 2nd round after beating Artem Dubrivnyy 7-5 7-63.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Dubrivnyy (7-5 7-63). During the match, Clarke scored 76 points vs Dubrivnyy’s 62. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Clarke fired 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jay Clarke was very effective on serve to win 85% (28/33) of his 1st serve and 63% (19/30) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Jay broke Dubrivnyy 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Clarke has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (172-126). 1-3 on hard in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Clarke has an aggregate72-45 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Brit has an overall 8-16 win-loss record in 2021, 1-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Sultan 3 Challenger
Jay has never competed in this tournament before.
Beibit Zhukayev
Ranked no. 729, the Kazakhstani reached the 2nd round after beating Nick Chappell 4-6 6-3 7-66.
In the 1st round against Chappell, Beibit recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 7-66). During the match Zhukayev scored 103 points vs Chappell’s 98. Beibit was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Zhukayev fired 12 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Beibit Zhukayev was very effective on serve to win 74% (42/57) of his 1st serve and 59% (26/44) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Zhukayev broke Chappell twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
The Kazakhstani’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in M15 Shymkent and Sultan.
Beibit has an aggregate 9-9 win-loss record in 2021, 6-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Clarke | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 32 |
| Pts | 76-62 | 103-98 |
| Total Points | 138 | 201 |
| Winners | 28 | 42 |
| %Winners | 37% | 41% |
Both Clarke and Zhukayev played 1 match. At the moment, Beibit Zhukayev conceded 1 set while Jay Clarke hasn’t dropped a set so far. Clarke has played 1 set(s) less than Zhukayev (2 vs 3). Therefore, Clarke played 7 games less than Zhukayev. Clarke scored 28 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Beibit scored 42 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Clarke | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 12 |
| 1st in | 33/63 | 57/101 |
| %1st in | 52% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 42/57 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 26/44 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 59% |
Clarke blasted 3 aces . Zhukayev managed to score 12 aces . Clarke won 85% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Zhukayev won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Clarke | Zhukayev |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 2/4 |
| % Converted | 75% | 50% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 33% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Jay dropped his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Beibit broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. The Kazakhstani conceded his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Clarke | |||
| R1 Dubrivnyy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 76-62 | 76-62 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 33/63 | 33/63 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 28/33 | 28/33 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/30 | 19/30 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Zhukayev | |||
| R1 Chappell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 103-98 | 103-98 | |
| Total points | 201 | 201 | |
| Winners | 42 | 42 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 57/101 | 57/101 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 42/57 | 42/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/44 | 26/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLWWWLWW
LWWLWWLLWW Tennis Scores in Sultan 3 Challenger
- Mirza BasicBasic – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Grigoriy LomakinLomakin (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Alessandro BegaBega (2-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yunseong ChungChung – Yan BondarevskiyBondarevskiy (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Hugo GrenierGrenier (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Artem DubrivnyyDubrivnyy (7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – Denis IstominIstomin (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Malek JaziriJaziri (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Lucas CatarinaCatarina (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Pavel KotovKotov (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Corentin DenollyDenolly (6-2 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Nick ChappellChappell (4-6 6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Dostanbek TashbulatovTashbulatov (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Borna GojoGojo – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirza BasicBasic – Ryan PenistonPeniston (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Peter PolanskyPolansky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Tung-Lin WuWu (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Yunseong ChungChung (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Borna GojoGojo – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
