Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Nerman Fatic will fight against each other in the quarter of the Perugia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Martin Etcheverry who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tomas Martin Etcheverry is the pick to win this match.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 1.38
Nerman Fatic -> 3.04
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Ranked no. 192 (career-high), Tomas reached the quarter after beating Andrea Arnaboldi 7-63 6-2 and Dominic Stephan Stricker 7-5 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Stephan Stricker (7-5 6-4). During the match, Martin Etcheverry scored 71 points vs Stephan Stricker’s 56. Tomas was exceptionally aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Regarding the service games, Martin Etcheverry bagged 7 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Tomas Martin Etcheverry was pretty efficient on serve to win 87% (39/45) of his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Argentine was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Stephan Stricker twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Argentine started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to win 56% of the points he played.
Martin Etcheverry has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (188-98). 33-17 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Martin Etcheverry has a composed165-83 match record in the last 6 years on clay.
Tomas’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Antalya 2 Challenger,the Biella 6 Challenger,the Biella 7 Challenger and the Forli Challenger.
The Argentine has an aggregate 34-19 win-loss record in 2021, 33-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Martin Etcheverry has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
Ranked no. 340, Nerman got to the quarter after defeating Mark Vervoort 6-1 6-1, Alexander Ritschard 6-3 7-65, Pedro Cachin 6-4 7-65 and Dimitar Kuzmanov 6-4 7-65.
In the 2nd round, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Kuzmanov (6-4 7-65). During the match Fatic scored 67 points vs Kuzmanov’s 66. The Bosnian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic scored 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Nerman Fatic lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 72% of his first serves in, winning 65% (32/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the 2nd serve. Nerman was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Kuzmanov 3 times.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nerman started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 54% of the points he played.
The Bosnian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in M15 Prijedor.
The Bosnian has an overall 18-9 win-loss record in 2021, 18-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin Etcheverry | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 43 | 82 |
| Pts | 143-111 | 275-237 |
| Total Points | 254 | 512 |
| Winners | 79 | 120 |
| %Winners | 55% | 44% |
Martin Etcheverry played 2 matches while Fatic competed in 4 matches. Fatic started his run from the qualifications while Martin Etcheverry had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Martin Etcheverry has played 4 set(s) less than Fatic (4 vs 8). Therefore, Martin Etcheverry played 39 games less than Fatic. Tomas scored 79 winners (55% of the total points). On the other side, Nerman scored 120 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin Etcheverry | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3.3 |
| 1st in | 86/114 | 169/248 |
| %1st in | 75% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 79/86 | 120/169 |
| %1st pts | 92% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 12/28 | 42/79 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 53% |
Martin Etcheverry struck 10 aces (5 per match). Fatic fired 13 aces (3.3 per match). Martin Etcheverry won 92% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin Etcheverry | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 14 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 14/22 |
| % Converted | 40% | 64% |
| Conceded | 2 | 15 |
| Saved | 2 | 10 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
The Argentine broke his opponents 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Martin Etcheverry was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 2 break points. Fatic broke his opponents 14 times with a 64% conversion rate. The Bosnian conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Martin Etcheverry | ||||
| R1 Arnaboldi |
R2 Stephan Stricker |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-2 | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 22 | 43 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 71-56 | 143-111 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | 254 | |
| Winners | 40 | 39 | 79 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 55% | 55% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 7 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/56 | 45/58 | 86/114 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 78% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 40/41 | 39/45 | 79/86 | |
| % 1st pts | 98% | 87% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/15 | 7/13 | 12/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 54% | 43% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/2 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 100% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatic | ||||||
| Q1 Vervoort |
Q3 Ritschard |
R1 Cachin |
R2 Kuzmanov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | 6-3 7-65 | 6-4 7-65 | 6-4 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 22 | 23 | 23 | 82 | |
| pts | 59-33 | 69-60 | 80-78 | 67-66 | 275-237 | |
| Total points | 92 | 129 | 158 | 133 | 512 | |
| Winners | 13 | 36 | 39 | 32 | 120 | |
| %Winners | 22% | 52% | 49% | 48% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 14/36 | 45/63 | 61/81 | 49/68 | 169/248 | |
| % 1st in | 39% | 71% | 75% | 72% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 13/14 | 36/45 | 39/61 | 32/49 | 120/169 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 80% | 64% | 65% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 8/18 | 9/20 | 10/19 | 42/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 44% | 45% | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 3/3 | 3/7 | 3/3 | 14/22 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 100% | 43% | 100% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 15 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/1 | 8/10 | 2/4 | 10 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | 80% | 50% | 65% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLLWWLWWW
WLLLWLWWWL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
