Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Dominic Stephan Stricker will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Perugia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tomas Martin Etcheverry who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tomas Martin Etcheverry is the pick to win this match.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry -> 1.89
Dominic Stephan Stricker -> 1.909
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs. Dominic Stephan Stricker
There is no head to head record between Tomas Martin Etcheverry and Dominic Stephan Stricker since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Ranked no. 192 (career-high), Martin Etcheverry reached the 2nd round after defeating Andrea Arnaboldi 7-63 6-2.
In the 1st round, Tomas had a good straight sets win against Arnaboldi (7-63 6-2). During the match, Martin Etcheverry scored 72 points vs Arnaboldi’s 55. The Argentine was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Martin Etcheverry fired 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tomas Martin Etcheverry conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Martin Etcheverry put 73% of his first serves in, winning 98% (40/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 33% (5/15) on the 2nd serve. Tomas broke Arnaboldi twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Martin Etcheverry has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (187-98). 32-17 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Martin Etcheverry has an aggregate164-83 record in the last 6 years on clay.
The Argentine’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in the Antalya 2 Challenger,the Biella 6 Challenger,the Biella 7 Challenger and the Forli Challenger.
Tomas has an overall 33-19 win-loss record in 2021, 32-17 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Perugia Challenger
Tomas has never competed in this tournament before.
Dominic Stephan Stricker
Ranked no. 293, Stephan Stricker got to the 2nd round after defeating Yannick Maden 7-63 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Maden (7-63 6-1). During the match Stephan Stricker scored 69 points vs Maden’s 41. Stephan Stricker was very aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Stephan Stricker bagged 17 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Dominic Stephan Stricker was very effective on serve to win 92% (34/37) of his 1st serve and 79% (11/14) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Swiss broke Maden twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
The Swiss’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Lugano Challenger.
Stephan Stricker has a composed 19-9 win-loss record in 2021, 6-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Martin Etcheverry | Stephan Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 20 |
| Pts | 72-55 | 69-41 |
| Total Points | 127 | 110 |
| Winners | 40 | 34 |
| %Winners | 56% | 49% |
Both Martin Etcheverry and Stephan Stricker played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Martin Etcheverry and Stephan Stricker have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Martin Etcheverry played 1 game more than Stephan Stricker. Martin Etcheverry scored 40 winners (56% of the total points). On the other side, Stephan Stricker bagged 34 winners (49%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Martin Etcheverry | Stephan Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 17 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 17 |
| 1st in | 41/56 | 37/51 |
| %1st in | 73% | 73% |
| 1st pts | 40/41 | 34/37 |
| %1st pts | 98% | 92% |
| 2nd pts | 5/15 | 11/14 |
| %2nd pts | 33% | 79% |
Martin Etcheverry blasted 3 aces . Stephan Stricker recorded 17 aces . Martin Etcheverry won 98% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 33% of the points. On the other side, Stephan Stricker won 92% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 79% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Martin Etcheverry | Stephan Stricker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 2 |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/7 |
| % Converted | 25% | 29% |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 |
| Saved | 1 | 0 |
| % Saved | 100% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Martin Etcheverry broke his opponent twice with a 25% conversion rate. The Argentine extremely effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. Stephan Stricker broke his opponent twice with a 29% conversion rate. The Swiss was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
| Martin Etcheverry | |||
| R1 Arnaboldi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 72-55 | 72-55 | |
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 56% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 41/56 | 41/56 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 40/41 | 40/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 98% | 98% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 33% | 33% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 2/8 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Stephan Stricker | |||
| R1 Maden |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 69-41 | 69-41 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 17 | 17 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 37/51 | 37/51 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 34/37 | 34/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 92% | 92% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/14 | 11/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 79% | 79% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 2/7 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLLLWWLWW
Tennis Scores in Perugia Challenger
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Francesco PassaroPassaro (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (6-1 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni – Evan FurnessFurness (2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Andrej MartinMartin (6-3 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Dmitry PopkoPopko (2-6 7-5 7-63) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (6-75 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Pedro CachinCachin (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Timofey SkatovSkatov – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (1-6 7-65 6-0) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Federico GaioGaio (2-6 6-3 7-62) – See score progression
- Francesco FortiForti – Andrea CollariniCollarini (4-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominic Stephan StrickerStephan Stricker – Yannick MadenMaden (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Luca VanniVanni (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Filippo BaldiBaldi – Nuno BorgesBorges (3-6 3-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Francesco PassaroPassaro (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Timofey SkatovSkatov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Francesco FortiForti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Nerman FaticFatic (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filippo BaldiBaldi – Flavio CobolliCobolli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Holger Vitus Nodskov RuneVitus Nodskov Rune – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
