
Gregoire Barrere and Jason Jung will clash against each other in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gregoire Barrere who should win in 5 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gregoire Barrere is the pick to win this match.
Gregoire Barrere -> 1.63
Jason Jung -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gregoire Barrere vs. Jason Jung
There is no head to head record between Gregoire Barrere and Jason Jung since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Gregoire Barrere
Ranked no. 133, Barrere got to the qualifications after beating Bjorn Fratangelo 2-6 6-3 6-4 and Sergiy Stakhovsky 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, The French player had a good straight sets win against Stakhovsky (7-5 6-3). During the match, Barrere scored 75 points vs Stakhovsky’s 65. The French player was pretty aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Barrere recorded 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Gregoire Barrere was pretty effective on serve to win 77% (36/47) of his 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The French player broke Stakhovsky twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gregoire started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in this event to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Barrere has a good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (341-239). 3-2 on grass in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Barrere has an overall 15-8 match record in the last years on grass.
Barrere’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Lille Challenger.
The French player has an aggregate 18-15 win-loss record in 2021, 3-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously at Wimbledon
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2019. See his history.
Jason Jung
Ranked no. 163, Jung got to the qualifications after defeating Peter Gojowczyk 6-3 7-64 and Tatsuma Ito 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Jason had a good straight sets win against Ito (6-2 6-1). During the match Jung and Ito scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 133 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about serving, Jung was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jason Jung conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of his first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chinese started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
The Chinese has an aggregate 6-12 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Barrere | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 48 | 37 |
| Pts | 159-148 | 74-62 |
| Total Points | 307 | 136 |
| Winners | 83 | 41 |
| %Winners | 52% | 55% |
Both Barrere and Jung played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Gregoire Barrere lost 1 set while Jason Jung hasn’t dropped a set so far. Barrere has played 1 set more than Jung (5 vs 4). Therefore, Barrere played 11 games more than Jung. The French player scored 83 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, Jason fired 41 winners (55%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Barrere | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 3.5 |
| 1st in | 108/171 | 51/78 |
| %1st in | 63% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 83/108 | 41/51 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 28/63 | 11/27 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 41% |
Barrere recorded 13 aces (6.5 per match). Jung scored 7 aces (3.5 per match). Barrere won 77% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Barrere | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 |
| Saved | 7 | 4 |
| % Saved | 78% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Barrere broke his opponents 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Jung broke his opponents 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. Jason conceded his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Barrere | ||||
| Q1 Fratangelo |
Q2 Stakhovsky |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 21 | 48 | |
| pts | 84-83 | 75-65 | 159-148 | |
| Total points | 167 | 140 | 307 | |
| Winners | 47 | 36 | 83 | |
| %Winners | 56% | 48% | 52% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 4 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 61/91 | 47/80 | 108/171 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 59% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 47/61 | 36/47 | 83/108 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/30 | 17/33 | 28/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 37% | 52% | 44% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Converted | 2/6 | 2/4 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 50% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 3 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 3/3 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 100% | 84% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Jung | ||||
| Q1 Gojowczyk |
Q2 Ito |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-64 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 15 | 37 | |
| pts | 74-62 | – | 74-62 | |
| Total points | 136 | 0 | 136 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | ||
| %Winners | 55% | NAN% | 55% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 0 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 51/78 | / | 51/78 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | – | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 41/51 | / | 41/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | – | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/27 | / | 11/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | – | 41% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 3 | ||
| Converted | 3/6 | / | 3/6 | |
| Converted % | 50% | – | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | ||
| Saved | 4/6 | 0/ | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 34% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLLWW
LLWLLWLLL Tennis Scores at the Wimbledon
- Antoine HoangHoang – Marius CopilCopil (7-65 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-1 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-3 6-75 6-4) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Robin HaaseHaase (6-75 7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Viktor TroickiTroicki (6-2 5-7 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Felix GillGill (7-68 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-3 6-73 7-5) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Kacper ZukZuk (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Zdenek KolarKolar (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (7-65 7-64) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Dudi SelaSela (6-74 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Andrej MartinMartin (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-2 7-62) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (6-73 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Anton MatusevichMatusevich – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Tatsuma ItoIto (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Matthew EbdenEbden (6-3 6-73 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Hugo DellienDellien (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Brayden SchnurSchnur (7-64 6-0) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Robin HaaseHaase (6-7(5) 7-6(4) 6-4) – See score progression
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (7-6(5) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-1 3-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-3 6-7(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (7-6(5) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Dudi SelaSela (6-7(4) 7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Maxime JanvierJanvier (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Matthew EbdenEbden (6-3 6-7(3) 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-3 6-7(3) 7-5) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-2 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Marius CopilCopil (7-6(5) 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Tatsuma ItoIto (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Federico GaioGaio (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Oscar OtteOtte (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Jason JungJung (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Tomas MachacMachac (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Antoine HoangHoang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-1) – H2H and prediction











