Botic Van De Zandschulp and Altug Celikbilek will square off in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 1st time in their career. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 5 sets.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.47
Altug Celikbilek -> 2.68
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Altug Celikbilek
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Altug Celikbilek since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 139 (career-high), Botic reached the qualifications after beating Paolo Lorenzi 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, Botic had a good straight sets win against Lorenzi (7-5 6-3). During the match, Van De Zandschulp and Lorenzi scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 139 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of his first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind his 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 66% of his matches (213-108). 1-1 on grass in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Van De Zandschulp has an aggregate1-2 record in the last 7 years on grass.
The Dutch has an overall 18-11 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously at Wimbledon
Van De Zandschulp has never competed in this tournament before.
Altug Celikbilek
Ranked no. 240, the Turk got to the qualifications after beating Constant Lestienne 6-72 7-64 6-2.
In the qualifications against Lestienne, The Turk recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-72 7-64 6-2). During the match Celikbilek scored 109 points vs Lestienne’s 100. Celikbilek was exceptionally aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Talking about serving, Celikbilek made 11 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Altug Celikbilek was quite efficient on serve to win 79% (50/63) of his 1st serve and 54% (25/46) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Altug broke Lestienne 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Altug’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the St. Petersburg 1 Challenger.
Celikbilek has a composed 22-12 win-loss record in 2021, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 34 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 109-100 |
| Total Points | 0 | 209 |
| Winners | 0 | 50 |
| %Winners | NAN% | 46% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Celikbilek played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Altug Celikbilek surrendered 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set(s) less than Celikbilek (2 vs 3). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 13 games less than Celikbilek. The Dutch scored 0 winners (NAN% of the total points). On the other side, Altug fired 50 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 11 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 63/109 |
| %1st in | NAN% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 50/63 |
| %1st pts | NAN% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 25/46 |
| %2nd pts | NAN% | 54% |
Van De Zandschulp didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Celikbilek managed to score 11 aces . Van De Zandschulp won NAN% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win NAN% of the points. On the other side, Celikbilek won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 4 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 4/5 |
| % Converted | NAN% | 80% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 6 |
| % Saved | NAN% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Van De Zandschulp hasn’t manged yet to break his opponent. He didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Botic had a solid display on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. Celikbilek broke his opponent 4 times with a 80% conversion rate. Celikbilek conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| Q1 Lorenzi | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | – | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | – | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | – | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | NAN% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | – | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Celikbilek | |||
| Q1 Lestienne | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-72 7-64 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 34 | 34 | |
| pts | 109-100 | 109-100 | |
| Total points | 209 | 209 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 63/109 | 63/109 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 50/63 | 50/63 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/46 | 25/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/5 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 80% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Tennis Scores at the Wimbledon
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (2-6 7-5 8-6) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Andrea CollariniCollarini (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (7-5 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Tommy RobredoRobredo (7-5 4-6 10-8) – See score progression
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (7-62 7-65) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Filippo BaldiBaldi (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (4-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (7-67 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Tatsuma ItoIto – Elias YmerYmer (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Hugo GastonGaston (1-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Ivo KarlovicKarlovic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-75 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Ryan PenistonPeniston (3-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Alexandre MullerMuller (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Blaz KavcicKavcic (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Lukas RosolRosol (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Constant LestienneLestienne (6-72 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Maxime CressyCressy – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (7-65 7-63) – See score progression
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Steven DiezDiez (6-3 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Dudi SelaSela – Stuart ParkerParker (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Matthew EbdenEbden – Sebastian BaezBaez (6-73 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Aleksandar VukicVukic (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez (6-4 6-75 6-2) – See score progression
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Mathias BourgueBourgue (3-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Blaz RolaRola (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Borna GojoGojo (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jack Pinnington JonesPinnington Jones – Joao MenezesMenezes (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Ruben BemelmansBemelmans – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Lukas LackoLacko (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Filip HoranskyHoransky (3-6 6-1 9-7) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Anton MatusevichMatusevich – William JansenJansen (4-6 6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Leonardo MayerMayer (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marius CopilCopil – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (7-68 6-76 7-5) – See score progression
- Ernests GulbisGulbis – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Emilio GomezGomez (6-1 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Felix GillGill – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (7-5 7-66) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Go SoedaSoeda (6-3 7-611) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Martin KlizanKlizan (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Andrej MartinMartin – Mats MoraingMoraing (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Quentin HalysHalys (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Yannick MadenMaden (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Joao DominguesDomingues (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Christopher EubanksEubanks (6-4 6-76 7-5) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Viktor TroickiTroicki – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tatsuma ItoIto – Jason JungJung (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Andrej MartinMartin – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Antoine HoangHoang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew EbdenEbden – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Frederico Ferreira SilvaFerreira Silva (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Kacper ZukZuk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Alex MolcanMolcan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Dudi SelaSela (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Daniel MasurMasur (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Tomas MachacMachac (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Oscar OtteOtte (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Robin HaaseHaase (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Federico GaioGaio (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Bernard TomicTomic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anton MatusevichMatusevich – Carlos TabernerTaberner (0-0) – H2H and prediction