Anastasija Sevastova and Marta Kostyuk will face off in the 1st round of the Eastbourne International for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:30 am on COURT 5. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marta Kostyuk who should win in 3 sets.
Marta Kostyuk -> 1.77
Anastasija Sevastova -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Anastasija Sevastova vs. Marta Kostyuk
This will be the 3rd time that Anastasija Sevastova and Marta Kostyuk play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Sevastova and Kostyuk (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they locked horns, Sevastova won 6-1 7-5 in the qualifications in Madrid back in April 2021.
Anastasija Sevastova
Ranked no. 61, the Latvian reached the 1st round after defeating Nao Hibino 6-0 7-63.
Sevastova has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of her matches (260-153). 1-1 on grass in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this competition, Sevastova has a composed 20-11 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Anastasija has an overall 16-12 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Previously, her best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2018. See her history.
Marta Kostyuk
Ranked no. 67, the Ukrainian got to the 1st round after beating Samantha Murray 7-5 6-3 and Shuai Zhang 4-6 6-4 6-0.
In the qualifications against Zhang, The Ukrainian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-0). During the match Kostyuk scored 97 points vs Zhang’s 80. Marta was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Kostyuk fired 5 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Marta Kostyuk lost the serve 4 times and she saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Kostyuk put 64% of her first serves in, winning 57% (31/54) of the points behind her 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the 2nd serve. Marta broke Zhang 7 times after converting 70% of her break points (7/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ukrainian started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 56% of the points she played.
Kostyuk’s best result of the year was getting to the semifinal in Abu Dhabi and Istanbul.
The Ukrainian has a composed 18-9 win-loss record in 2021, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Sevastova | Kostyuk |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 2 | 5 |
Tot Games | 19 | 47 |
Pts | 70-49 | 171-132 |
Total Points | 119 | 303 |
Winners | 29 | 56 |
%Winners | 41% | 33% |
Sevastova played 1 match while Kostyuk competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Marta Kostyuk lost 1 set while Anastasija Sevastova hasn’t dropped a set so far. Sevastova has played 3 set(s) less than Kostyuk (2 vs 5). Therefore, Sevastova played 28 games less than Kostyuk. The Latvian scored 29 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Kostyuk managed to score 56 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Sevastova | Kostyuk |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 6 |
Avg per match | 8 | 3 |
1st in | 41/66 | 91/142 |
%1st in | 62% | 64% |
1st pts | 29/41 | 56/91 |
%1st pts | 71% | 62% |
2nd pts | 13/25 | 31/51 |
%2nd pts | 52% | 61% |
Sevastova made 8 aces . Kostyuk fired 6 aces (3 per match). Sevastova won 71% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 52% of the points. On the other side, Kostyuk won 62% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 61% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Sevastova | Kostyuk |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 12 |
Converted | 5/6 | 12/18 |
% Converted | 83% | 67% |
Conceded | 4 | 18 |
Saved | 2 | 11 |
% Saved | 50% | 61% |
Times Broken | 2 | 7 |
The Latvian broke her opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Anastasija dropped her serve twice and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded. The Ukrainian broke her opponents 12 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Ukrainian conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 61% of the break points that she conceded.
Sevastova | ||||
Q1 Hibino | Q3 Mchale | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 7-63 | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 30 | 49 | |
pts | 70-49 | – | 70-49 | |
Total points | 119 | 0 | 119 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | ||
%Winners | 41% | NAN% | 41% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
1st in | 41/66 | / | 41/66 | |
% 1st in | 62% | – | 62% | |
1st pts | 29/41 | / | 29/41 | |
% 1st pts | 71% | – | 71% | |
2nd pts | 13/25 | / | 13/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 52% | – | 52% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 5 | ||
Converted | 5/6 | / | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | – | 83% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | ||
Saved | 2/4 | 0/ | 2 | |
Saved % | 50% | – | 25% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Kostyuk | ||||
Q1 Murray | Q3 Zhang | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 6-3 | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 26 | 47 | |
pts | 74-52 | 97-80 | 171-132 | |
Total points | 126 | 177 | 303 | |
Winners | 25 | 31 | 56 | |
%Winners | 34% | 32% | 33% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 37/57 | 54/85 | 91/142 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 64% | 64% | |
1st pts | 25/37 | 31/54 | 56/91 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 57% | 62% | |
2nd pts | 13/20 | 18/31 | 31/51 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 58% | 61% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 7/10 | 12/18 | |
Converted % | 63% | 70% | 67% | |
Conceded | 5 | 13 | 18 | |
Saved | 2/5 | 9/13 | 11 | |
Saved % | 40% | 69% | 55% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 7 |
Tennis Scores in Eastbourne
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Madison BrengleBrengle (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Christina MchaleMchale – Anastasija SevastovaSevastova (3-6 6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Bernarda PeraPera – Shelby RogersRogers (7-5 0-6 6-0) – See score progression
- Marta KostyukKostyuk – Shuai ZhangZhang (4-6 6-4 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka – Bernarda PeraPera (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Alison RiskeRiske (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – Kiki BertensBertens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Karolina PliskovaPliskova (1-5) – H2H and prediction
- Bianca Vanessa AndreescuVanessa Andreescu – Christina MchaleMchale (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anett KontaveitKontaveit – Svetlana KuznetsovaKuznetsova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Viktorija GolubicGolubic – Samantha StosurStosur (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Belinda BencicBencic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (1-4) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Heather WatsonWatson – Iga SwiatekSwiatek (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elise MertensMertens – Cori GauffGauff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasija SevastovaSevastova – Marta KostyukKostyuk (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Harriet DartDart – Elena RybakinaRybakina (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (0-0) – H2H and prediction