Thomas Fabbiano and Anton Matusevich will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Thomas Fabbiano who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Thomas Fabbiano is the pick to win this match.
Thomas Fabbiano -> 1.46
Anton Matusevich -> 2.72
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Thomas Fabbiano vs. Anton Matusevich
There is no head to head record between Thomas Fabbiano and Anton Matusevich since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Thomas Fabbiano
Ranked no. 164, Fabbiano reached the 2nd round after defeating Brandon Nakashima 4-6 7-60 6-3.
In the 1st round against Nakashima, Thomas recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 7-60 6-3). During the match, Fabbiano scored 105 points vs Nakashima’s 98. The Italian was quite aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Regarding the service games, Fabbiano bagged 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Thomas Fabbiano was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 73% (43/59) of his 1st serve and 51% (23/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The Italian broke Nakashima 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Fabbiano has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 55% of his matches (317-257). 1-1 on grass in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Fabbiano has a compiled 29-20 record in the last years on grass.
Fabbiano has a composed 10-14 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2017. See his history.
Anton Matusevich
Ranked no. 547 (career-high), the Brit reached the 2nd round after beating Mikael Ymer 6-3 7-5.
In the 1st round, Anton had a good straight sets win against Ymer (6-3 7-5). During the match Matusevich scored 74 points vs Ymer’s 58. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
About the serving games, Matusevich scored 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Anton Matusevich was very effective on serve to win 87% (26/30) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Anton broke Ymer 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Matusevich’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Kouvola.
Matusevich has a compiled 6-2 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Fabbiano | Matusevich |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 32 | 21 |
Pts | 105-98 | 74-58 |
Total Points | 203 | 132 |
Winners | 43 | 26 |
%Winners | 41% | 35% |
Both Fabbiano and Matusevich played 1 match. At the moment, Thomas Fabbiano surrendered 1 set while Anton Matusevich hasn’t lost a set so far. Fabbiano has played 1 set more than Matusevich (3 vs 2). Therefore, Fabbiano played 11 games more than Matusevich. The Italian scored 43 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Anton bagged 26 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Fabbiano | Matusevich |
---|---|---|
Aces | 6 | 3 |
Avg per match | 6 | 3 |
1st in | 59/104 | 30/56 |
%1st in | 57% | 54% |
1st pts | 43/59 | 26/30 |
%1st pts | 73% | 87% |
2nd pts | 23/45 | 15/26 |
%2nd pts | 51% | 58% |
Fabbiano recorded 6 aces . Matusevich recorded 3 aces . Fabbiano won 73% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Matusevich won 87% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Fabbiano | Matusevich |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 4 |
Converted | 3/7 | 4/10 |
% Converted | 43% | 40% |
Conceded | 12 | 3 |
Saved | 9 | 2 |
% Saved | 75% | 67% |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Fabbiano broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Italian surrendered his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Anton broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Anton conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Fabbiano | |||
R1 Nakashima |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 7-60 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
pts | 105-98 | 105-98 | |
Total points | 203 | 203 | |
Winners | 43 | 43 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 59/104 | 59/104 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 43/59 | 43/59 | |
% 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
2nd pts | 23/45 | 23/45 | |
% 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
Saved | 9/12 | 9 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Matusevich | |||
R1 Ymer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 74-58 | 74-58 | |
Total points | 132 | 132 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 30/56 | 30/56 | |
% 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
1st pts | 26/30 | 26/30 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Nottingham 2 Challenger
- Federico GaioGaio – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Kevin AndersonAnderson (7-5 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Tomas MachacMachac (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Andreas SeppiSeppi (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Marius CopilCopil (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Yuichi SugitaSugita (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Leonardo MayerMayer (3-6 6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (4-6 7-5 7-66) – See score progression
- Anton MatusevichMatusevich – Mikael YmerYmer (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Go SoedaSoeda (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Antoine HoangHoang (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (4-6 7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Maxime CressyCressy (7-5 6-78 7-64) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Leonardo MayerMayer (3-6 6-3 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Kevin AndersonAnderson (7-5 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Marius CopilCopil (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (2-0) – H2H and prediction