Richard Gasquet and Jay Clarke will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Nottingham 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 5:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Richard Gasquet who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Richard Gasquet is the pick to win this match.
Richard Gasquet -> 1.098
Jay Clarke -> 7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Richard Gasquet vs. Jay Clarke
There is no head to head record between Richard Gasquet and Jay Clarke since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Richard Gasquet
Ranked no. 54, Richard got to the 2nd round after beating Go Soeda 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Richard had a good straight sets win against Soeda (6-4 6-2). During the match, Gasquet scored 73 points vs Soeda’s 58. Richard was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gasquet recorded 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Richard Gasquet lost the serve once. Furthermore, Gasquet put 64% of his first serves in, winning 87% (26/30) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. The French player broke Soeda 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Gasquet has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (306-174). 1-0 on grass in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gasquet has a composed 36-20 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Richard has a composed 9-7 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 2 Challenger
Previously, he won this tournament twice in 2005 and 2006. See his history.
Jay Clarke
Ranked no. 233, Clarke got to the 2nd round after beating Maxime Cressy 7-5 6-78 7-64.
In the 1st round, The Brit defeated Cressy (7-5 6-78 7-64). During the match Clarke scored 124 points vs Cressy’s 113. The Brit was very aggressive to blast 57 winners.
Talking about serving, Clarke struck 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jay Clarke was quite effective on serve to win 79% (57/72) of his 1st serve and 56% (25/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Clarke broke Cressy 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Jay has an overall 7-13 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gasquet | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 38 |
| Pts | 73-58 | 124-113 |
| Total Points | 131 | 237 |
| Winners | 26 | 57 |
| %Winners | 36% | 46% |
Both Gasquet and Clarke played 1 match. At the moment, Jay Clarke conceded 1 set while Richard Gasquet hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Gasquet has played 1 set(s) less than Clarke (2 vs 3). Therefore, Gasquet played 20 games less than Clarke. Richard scored 26 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Jay managed to score 57 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gasquet | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 8 |
| 1st in | 30/47 | 72/117 |
| %1st in | 64% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 57/72 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 25/45 |
| %2nd pts | 41% | 56% |
Gasquet managed to score 3 aces . Clarke bagged 8 aces . Gasquet won 87% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 41% of the points. On the other side, Clarke won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gasquet | Clarke |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 3/10 |
| % Converted | 33% | 30% |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Gasquet broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. The French player surrendered his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 3 times with a 30% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gasquet | |||
| R1 Soeda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 73-58 | 73-58 | |
| Total points | 131 | 131 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 30/47 | 30/47 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 26/30 | 26/30 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 7/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Clarke | |||
| R1 Cressy |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-78 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 38 | 38 | |
| pts | 124-113 | 124-113 | |
| Total points | 237 | 237 | |
| Winners | 57 | 57 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 72/117 | 72/117 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 57/72 | 57/72 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/45 | 25/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/10 | 3/10 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLLWLW
LWLLWWWLWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham 2 Challenger
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Marius CopilCopil (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Yuichi SugitaSugita (6-0 6-3) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Leonardo MayerMayer (3-6 6-3 7-61) – See score progression
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (4-6 7-5 7-66) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-4 7-67) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Kevin AndersonAnderson (7-5 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Tomas MachacMachac (3-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Andreas SeppiSeppi (7-61 6-4) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Antoine HoangHoang (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (4-6 7-60 6-3) – See score progression
- Aidan MchughMchugh – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Maxime CressyCressy (7-5 6-78 7-64) – See score progression
- Anton MatusevichMatusevich – Mikael YmerYmer (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Go SoedaSoeda (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Alex BoltBolt – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Leonardo MayerMayer (3-6 6-3 7-6(1)) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Kevin AndersonAnderson (7-5 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Marius CopilCopil (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FabbianoFabbiano – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Aidan MchughMchugh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (2-0) – H2H and prediction
