Denis Kudla and Kamil Majchrzak will play each other in the semifinal of the Nottingham 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 7:30 pm on CENTRE COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.9
Denis Kudla -> 1.9
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Denis Kudla vs. Kamil Majchrzak
There is no head to head record between Denis Kudla and Kamil Majchrzak since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Denis Kudla
Ranked no. 120, Denis reached the semifinal after defeating Tomas Machac 6-3 4-6 6-4, Liam Broady 3-6 6-3 7-62 and Daniel Evans 6-4 1-6 6-4.
In the quarter, Kudla defeated Evans (6-4 1-6 6-4).-86) than Evans. In fact, the world no. 120 won 86 points vs Evans’s. That means that Kudla was more focused during the important points. Kudla was exceptionally aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Regarding the service games, Kudla bagged 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Denis Kudla lost the serve 4 times and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Kudla put 59% of his first serves in, winning 77% (37/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 35% (12/34) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Evans 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Denis started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 3 set in this tournament to conquer 51% of the points he played.
Kudla has a positive record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (338-252). 3-0 on grass in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Kudla has an aggregate 57-35 win-loss record in the last years on grass.
Denis’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Orlando Challenger.
Kudla has an aggregate 16-12 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2014. See his history.
Kamil Majchrzak
Ranked no. 126, the Pole reached the semifinal after defeating Prajnesh Gunneswaran 6-0 0-0 ret., Aleksandar Vukic 5-7 7-610 6-4 and Andreas Seppi 4-6 6-2 6-3.
In the quarter against Seppi, The Pole recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-2 6-3). During the match Majchrzak scored 90 points vs Seppi’s 68. The Pole was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Majchrzak fired 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Kamil Majchrzak was extremely efficient on serve to win 74% (40/54) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. Majchrzak broke Seppi 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Majchrzak started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
The Pole has an aggregate 13-10 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Kudla | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 87 | 68 |
| Pts | 280-264 | 225-180 |
| Total Points | 544 | 405 |
| Winners | 113 | 99 |
| %Winners | 40% | 44% |
Both Kudla and Majchrzak played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Denis Kudla lost 3 sets, while Kamil Majchrzak surrendered 2 sets. Talking about their workload, Kudla and Majchrzak have played the same amount of sets 9. However, Kudla played 19 games more than Majchrzak. Kudla scored 113 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Pole fired 99 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Kudla | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 28 | 21 |
| Avg per match | 9.3 | 7 |
| 1st in | 146/264 | 124/190 |
| %1st in | 55% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 113/146 | 99/124 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 59/118 | 42/66 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 64% |
Kudla bagged 28 aces (9.3 per match). Majchrzak made 21 aces (7 per match). Kudla won 77% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Kudla | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 9 |
| Converted | 9/36 | 9/22 |
| % Converted | 25% | 41% |
| Conceded | 26 | 10 |
| Saved | 17 | 6 |
| % Saved | 65% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 9 | 4 |
Denis broke his opponents 9 times with a 25% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve 9 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded. The Pole broke his opponents 9 times with a 41% conversion rate. The Pole conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Kudla | |||||
| R1 Machac |
R2 Broady |
1/4 Evans |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | 3-6 6-3 7-62 | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 31 | 27 | 87 | |
| pts | 93-83 | 101-90 | 86-91 | 280-264 | |
| Total points | 176 | 191 | 177 | 544 | |
| Winners | 36 | 40 | 37 | 113 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 40% | 43% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 14 | 9 | 5 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 0 | 3 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 49/94 | 49/88 | 48/82 | 146/264 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 56% | 59% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 36/49 | 40/49 | 37/48 | 113/146 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 82% | 77% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 23/45 | 24/39 | 12/34 | 59/118 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 62% | 35% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 1 | 3 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 1/11 | 3/12 | 9/36 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 9% | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 5 | 9 | 26 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 4/5 | 5/9 | 17 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 80% | 56% | 68% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 4 | 9 | |
| Majchrzak | |||||
| R1 Gunneswaran |
R2 Vukic |
1/4 Seppi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 0-0 ret. | 5-7 7-610 6-4 | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 6 | 35 | 27 | 68 | |
| pts | 25-6 | 110-106 | 90-68 | 225-180 | |
| Total points | 31 | 216 | 158 | 405 | |
| Winners | 8 | 51 | 40 | 99 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 46% | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 9 | 9 | 21 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 8/14 | 62/98 | 54/78 | 124/190 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 63% | 69% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 8/8 | 51/62 | 40/54 | 99/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 82% | 74% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/6 | 25/36 | 13/24 | 42/66 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 69% | 54% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 5 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 1/5 | 5/13 | 9/22 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 20% | 38% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 5/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 63% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLWWLW
LWWLWWWLWL Tennis Scores in Nottingham 1 Challenger
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (7-64 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Daniel EvansEvans (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Andreas SeppiSeppi (4-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Marius CopilCopil – Kevin AndersonAnderson (7-64 7-69) – See score progression
- Denis KudlaKudla – Daniel EvansEvans (6-4 1-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Andreas SeppiSeppi (4-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marius CopilCopil – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
