Andreas Seppi and Kamil Majchrzak will clash against each other in the quarter of the Nottingham 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 4:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andreas Seppi who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andreas Seppi is the pick to win this match.
Andreas Seppi -> 1.77
Kamil Majchrzak -> 2.05
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andreas Seppi vs. Kamil Majchrzak
This will be the 2nd time that Andreas Seppi and Kamil Majchrzak square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Seppi (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Seppi won 6-2 7-6(1) in the 1st round in Antalya back in 2017.
Andreas Seppi
Ranked no. 98, Seppi reached the quarter after defeating Zhizhen Zhang 7-64 6-2 and Antoine Hoang 6-4 6-74 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Seppi defeated Hoang (6-4 6-74 6-2). During the match, Seppi scored 104 points vs Hoang’s 88. Seppi was exceptionally aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Seppi recorded 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Andreas Seppi was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (44/56) of his 1st serve and 64% (21/33) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Andreas broke Hoang 4 times after converting 29% of his break points (4/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Italian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in this event to conquer 55% of the points he played.
Seppi has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 52% of his matches (268-252). 2-0 on grass in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Seppi has a compiled 41-28 record in the last years on grass.
Andreas’s best result of the year was reaching the final in the Biella 3 Challenger.
Andreas has a composed 13-7 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2006. See his history.
Kamil Majchrzak
Ranked no. 126, the Pole reached the quarter after defeating Prajnesh Gunneswaran 6-0 0-0 ret. and Aleksandar Vukic 5-7 7-610 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Vukic, Majchrzak recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-610 6-4). During the match Majchrzak scored 110 points vs Vukic’s 106. Majchrzak was exceptionally aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about serving, Majchrzak blasted 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Overall, Kamil Majchrzak was exceptionally effective on serve to win 82% (51/62) of his 1st serve and 69% (25/36) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Majchrzak broke Vukic once after converting 20% of his break points (1/5).
Kamil has a compiled 12-10 win-loss record in 2021, 2-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Seppi | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 52 | 41 |
| Pts | 172-139 | 135-112 |
| Total Points | 311 | 247 |
| Winners | 71 | 59 |
| %Winners | 41% | 44% |
Both Seppi and Majchrzak played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Andreas Seppi lost 1 set, while Kamil Majchrzak lost 1 set. Seppi has played 1 set(s) less than Majchrzak (5 vs 6). However, it’s interesting to notice that Seppi played 11 games more than Majchrzak. Andreas scored 71 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Majchrzak made 59 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Seppi | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 4.5 | 6 |
| 1st in | 90/146 | 70/112 |
| %1st in | 62% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 71/90 | 59/70 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 38/56 | 29/42 |
| %2nd pts | 68% | 69% |
Seppi recorded 9 aces (4.5 per match). Majchrzak bagged 12 aces (6 per match). Seppi won 79% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 69% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Seppi | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 4 |
| Converted | 6/17 | 4/9 |
| % Converted | 35% | 44% |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 1 |
| % Saved | 75% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Seppi broke his opponents 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. Seppi surrendered his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Kamil broke his opponents 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. The Pole conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Seppi | ||||
| R1 Zhang |
R2 Hoang |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-2 | 6-4 6-74 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 31 | 52 | |
| pts | 68-51 | 104-88 | 172-139 | |
| Total points | 119 | 192 | 311 | |
| Winners | 27 | 44 | 71 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 4 | 5 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 56/89 | 90/146 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 63% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 44/56 | 71/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/23 | 21/33 | 38/56 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 64% | 68% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 4/14 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 29% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 75% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Majchrzak | ||||
| R1 Gunneswaran |
R2 Vukic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 0-0 ret. | 5-7 7-610 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 6 | 35 | 41 | |
| pts | 25-6 | 110-106 | 135-112 | |
| Total points | 31 | 216 | 247 | |
| Winners | 8 | 51 | 59 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 46% | 44% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 3 | 9 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 8/14 | 62/98 | 70/112 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 8/8 | 51/62 | 59/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 100% | 82% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/6 | 25/36 | 29/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 1/5 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 20% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWLWL Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andreas SeppiSeppi – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marius CopilCopil – Kevin AndersonAnderson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Frances TiafoeTiafoe (1-0) – H2H and prediction
