Jason Jung and Mitchell Krueger will clash against each other in the quarter of the Little Rock Challenger for the 10th time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 2:00 pm on STADIUM COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jason Jung who should win in 3 sets.
Jason Jung -> 1.59
Mitchell Krueger -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Jason Jung vs. Mitchell Krueger
This will be the 10th time that Jason Jung and Mitchell Krueger square off. The head to head is 6-3 for Jung (see full H2H stats), 4-3 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Jung won 6-2 6-4 in the qualifications in New york back in 2020.
Highlights Jason Jung vs Mitchell Krueger – New york 10-February-2020
Jason Jung
Ranked no. 160, Jason reached the quarter after defeating Christian Harrison 6-1 6-2 and Hiroki Moriya 6-3 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Jason had a good straight sets win against Moriya (6-3 6-4). During the match, Jung scored 59 points vs Moriya’s 46. Jung was quite aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Jung made 7 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Jason Jung was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 80% (28/35) of his 1st serve and 80% (8/10) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jung broke Moriya 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Chinese started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to conquer 59% of the points he played.
Jung has a winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (335-245). 3-3 on hard in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jung has an aggregate 251-162 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Jason has an aggregate 4-9 win-loss record in 2021, 3-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Little Rock Challenger
Jason has never competed in this tournament before.
Mitchell Krueger
Ranked no. 207, the American reached the quarter after defeating Zane Khan 6-2 6-4 and Darian King 6-3 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Mitchell had a good straight sets win against King (6-3 6-2). During the match Krueger scored 74 points vs King’s 57. Mitchell was exceptionally aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Krueger blasted 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Mitchell Krueger conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 6 break points. Furthermore, Krueger put 60% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the 2nd serve. Mitchell broke King 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Krueger started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Krueger’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in M25 Naples.
Mitchell has an aggregate 9-9 win-loss record in 2021, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jung | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 34 | 35 |
| Pts | 121-84 | 134-104 |
| Total Points | 205 | 238 |
| Winners | 56 | 54 |
| %Winners | 46% | 40% |
Both Jung and Krueger played 2 matches. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jung and Krueger have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Jung played 1 game less than Krueger. The Chinese scored 56 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Krueger fired 54 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jung | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 4.5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 70/98 | 77/121 |
| %1st in | 71% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 56/70 | 54/77 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 17/28 | 25/44 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 57% |
Jung struck 9 aces (4.5 per match). Krueger made 10 aces (5 per match). Jung won 80% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Krueger won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jung | Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 8 |
| Converted | 7/15 | 8/15 |
| % Converted | 47% | 53% |
| Conceded | 3 | 10 |
| Saved | 3 | 9 |
| % Saved | 100% | 90% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Jung broke his opponents 7 times with a 47% conversion rate. Jason extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. Mitchell broke his opponents 8 times with a 53% conversion rate. Mitchell conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jung | ||||
| R1 Harrison | R2 Moriya | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 19 | 34 | |
| pts | 62-38 | 59-46 | 121-84 | |
| Total points | 100 | 105 | 205 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 47% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/53 | 35/45 | 70/98 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 78% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 28/35 | 28/35 | 56/70 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/18 | 8/10 | 17/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 80% | 61% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 3/7 | 7/15 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 43% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 0/0 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | – | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Krueger | ||||
| R1 Khan | R2 King | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 | 35 | |
| pts | 60-47 | 74-57 | 134-104 | |
| Total points | 107 | 131 | 238 | |
| Winners | 26 | 28 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 37/54 | 40/67 | 77/121 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 60% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 26/37 | 28/40 | 54/77 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/17 | 15/27 | 25/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 56% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/11 | 8/15 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 36% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 6/6 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 100% | 88% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jason JungJung – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jack SockSock – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Goncalo OliveiraOliveira – Oliver CrawfordCrawford (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Emilio GomezGomez (0-1) – H2H and prediction