Bjorn Fratangelo and Aleksandar Vukic will face off in the qualifications of the French Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on Court 7. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bjorn Fratangelo who should win in 5 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bjorn Fratangelo is the pick to win this match.
Bjorn Fratangelo -> 1.59
Aleksandar Vukic -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bjorn Fratangelo vs. Aleksandar Vukic
There is no head to head record between Bjorn Fratangelo and Aleksandar Vukic since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Bjorn Fratangelo
Ranked no. 197, the American got to the qualifications after beating Go Soeda 6-2 6-3 and Blaz Rola 6-76 6-3 6-1.
In the qualifications against Rola, Fratangelo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-76 6-3 6-1). During the match, Fratangelo scored 105 points vs Rola’s 88. The American was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about the service games, Fratangelo recorded 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Bjorn Fratangelo was very effective on serve to win 72% (38/53) of his 1st serve and 59% (22/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Bjorn broke Rola 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Fratangelo started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Fratangelo has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (355-218). 9-4 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Fratangelo has a compiled 160-81 match record in the last years on clay.
Fratangelo’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Cleveland Challenger and the Tallahassee Challenger.
The American has an aggregate 19-7 win-loss record in 2021, 9-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2016. See his history.
Aleksandar Vukic
Ranked no. 208, the Australian got to the qualifications after defeating Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-3 6-1 and Viktor Troicki 3-6 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications against Troicki, Aleksandar recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-2 6-4). During the match Vukic scored 78 points vs Troicki’s 71. Aleksandar was extremely aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Vukic blasted 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Aleksandar Vukic was extremely efficient on serve to win 80% (39/49) of his 1st serve and 52% (15/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Australian broke Troicki 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Vukic started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Aleksandar has an overall 9-10 win-loss record in 2021, 8-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Fratangelo | Vukic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 46 | 43 |
| Pts | 169-133 | 139-107 |
| Total Points | 302 | 246 |
| Winners | 65 | 64 |
| %Winners | 38% | 46% |
Both Fratangelo and Vukic played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Bjorn Fratangelo lost 1 set, while Aleksandar Vukic dropped 1 set. Talking about their workload, Fratangelo and Vukic have played the same amount of sets 5. However, Fratangelo played 3 games more than Vukic. Bjorn scored 65 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Vukic managed to score 64 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Fratangelo | Vukic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 16 |
| Avg per match | 2.5 | 8 |
| 1st in | 90/142 | 76/120 |
| %1st in | 63% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 65/90 | 64/76 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 84% |
| 2nd pts | 32/52 | 24/44 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 55% |
Fratangelo scored 5 aces (2.5 per match). Vukic fired 16 aces (8 per match). Fratangelo won 72% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Vukic won 84% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Fratangelo | Vukic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 7 |
| Converted | 10/24 | 7/11 |
| % Converted | 42% | 64% |
| Conceded | 7 | 8 |
| Saved | 5 | 6 |
| % Saved | 71% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The American broke his opponents 10 times with a 42% conversion rate. Fratangelo surrendered his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Vukic broke his opponents 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Fratangelo | ||||
| Q1 Soeda |
Q2 Rola |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 6-76 6-3 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 29 | 46 | |
| pts | 64-45 | 105-88 | 169-133 | |
| Total points | 109 | 193 | 302 | |
| Winners | 27 | 38 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 36% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 4 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 37/52 | 53/90 | 90/142 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 59% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 38/53 | 65/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 22/37 | 32/52 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 59% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/9 | 6/15 | 10/24 | |
| Converted % | 44% | 40% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 1/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Vukic | ||||
| Q1 Ferreira Silva |
Q2 Troicki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 27 | 43 | |
| pts | 61-36 | 78-71 | 139-107 | |
| Total points | 97 | 149 | 246 | |
| Winners | 25 | 39 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 50% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 9 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 27/42 | 49/78 | 76/120 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 25/27 | 39/49 | 64/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 93% | 80% | 84% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/15 | 15/29 | 24/44 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 52% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 7 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 3/4 | 7/11 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 75% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 | 8 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 5/7 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 71% | 86% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWLLWLLW Tennis Scores at the French Open
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Viktor TroickiTroicki (3-6 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (6-2 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-77 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Arthur FilsFils (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Blaz KavcicKavcic (7-64 6-74 6-4) – See score progression
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Blaz RolaRola (6-76 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Steven DiezDiez (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Liam BroadyBroady (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Danilo PetrovicPetrovic (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Borna GojoGojo (6-3 6-74 7-63) – See score progression
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (6-73 6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Manuel GuinardGuinard (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Dmitry PopkoPopko (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Denis IstominIstomin – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Zhizhen ZhangZhang (6-0 7-62) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-78 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Sumit NagalNagal (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Yannick MadenMaden (6-1 6-73 6-1) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Denis KudlaKudla (5-7 7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry (6-7(7) 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Alejandro TabiloTabilo – Sumit NagalNagal (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Renzo OlivoOlivo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (6-7(8) 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Evan FurnessFurness – Denis KudlaKudla (5-7 7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-7(5) 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Denis IstominIstomin – Tobias KamkeKamke (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Oscar OtteOtte (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Quentin HalysHalys (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Carlos TabernerTaberner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Peter GojowczykGojowczyk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Marc PolmansPolmans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Francisco CerundoloCerundolo – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Alejandro TabiloTabilo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
