Cori Gauff and Qiang Wang will square off in the final of the Emilia-Romagna Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 2:30 pm on Centre Court. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Cori Gauff who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Cori Gauff is the pick to win this match.
Cori Gauff -> 1.48
Qiang Wang -> 2.81
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Cori Gauff vs. Qiang Wang
There is no head to head record between Cori Gauff and Qiang Wang since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Cori Gauff
Ranked no. 30 (career-high), the American got to the final after beating Kaia Kanepi 7-66 7-67, Camila Giorgi 6-2 6-3, Amanda Anisimova 6-3 6-3 and Katerina Siniakova 7-5 1-6 6-2.
In the semifinal, The American defeated Siniakova (7-5 1-6 6-2). During the match, Gauff scored 97 points vs Siniakova’s 90. Cori was quite aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gauff blasted 3 aces and she committed only 8 double faults. Cori Gauff lost the serve 5 times and she saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Gauff put 64% of her first serves in, winning 61% (37/61) of the points behind her 1st serve and 49% (17/35) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Siniakova 6 times after converting 67% of her break points (6/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Cori started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has surrendered 1 set in this tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
Gauff has a solid match record in the last 5 years having won 67% of her matches (72-36). 11-3 on clay in 2021. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Gauff has an overall25-12 record in the last 5 years on clay.
The American’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Adelaide, Rome and Parma.
Gauff has an overall 22-9 win-loss record in 2021, 11-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Parma
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Qiang Wang
Ranked no. 48, Wang reached the final after defeating Misaki Doi 6-2 5-7 6-1, Martina Di Giuseppe 6-4 6-4, Petra Martic 7-64 3-6 7-5 and Sloane Stephens 6-2 7-63.
In the semifinal, Qiang had a good straight sets win against Stephens (6-2 7-63). During the match Wang scored 84 points vs Stephens’s 70. The Chinese was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Wang managed to score 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Qiang Wang lost the serve 3 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 60% of her first serves in, winning 63% (29/46) of the points behind her 1st serve and 55% (17/31) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Stephens 5 times after converting 45% of her break points (5/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Qiang started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points she played.
The Chinese’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in Parma.
Wang has a composed 8-11 win-loss record in 2021, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gauff | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 88 | 102 |
| Pts | 326-283 | 407-353 |
| Total Points | 609 | 760 |
| Winners | 128 | 136 |
| %Winners | 39% | 33% |
Both Gauff and Wang played 4 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Cori Gauff lost 1 set, while Qiang Wang surrendered 2 sets. Gauff has played 1 set(s) less than Wang (9 vs 10). Therefore, Gauff played 14 games less than Wang. Cori scored 128 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Wang blasted 136 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gauff | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5.8 |
| 1st in | 182/297 | 208/374 |
| %1st in | 61% | 56% |
| 1st pts | 128/182 | 136/208 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 46/115 | 83/166 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 50% |
Gauff recorded 16 aces (4 per match). Wang bagged 23 aces (5.8 per match). Gauff won 70% points on her first serve. She quite strong on her second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Wang won 65% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gauff | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 21 | 23 |
| Converted | 21/42 | 23/49 |
| % Converted | 50% | 47% |
| Conceded | 33 | 52 |
| Saved | 20 | 36 |
| % Saved | 61% | 69% |
| Times Broken | 13 | 16 |
Gauff broke her opponents 21 times with a 50% conversion rate. Gauff surrendered her serve 13 times and she saved 61% of the break points that she conceded. The Chinese broke her opponents 23 times with a 47% conversion rate. The Chinese conceded her serve 16 times and she saved 69% of the break points that she conceded.
| Gauff | ||||||
| R1 Kanepi |
R2 Giorgi |
1/4 Anisimova |
1/2 Siniakova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 7-67 | 6-2 6-3 | 6-3 6-3 | 7-5 1-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 17 | 18 | 27 | 88 | |
| pts | 103-98 | 64-46 | 62-49 | 97-90 | 326-283 | |
| Total points | 201 | 110 | 111 | 187 | 609 | |
| Winners | 41 | 26 | 24 | 37 | 128 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% | 39% | 38% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 23 | |
| 1st in | 56/92 | 32/54 | 33/55 | 61/96 | 182/297 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 59% | 60% | 64% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 41/56 | 26/32 | 24/33 | 37/61 | 128/182 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 81% | 73% | 61% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/36 | 9/22 | 7/22 | 17/35 | 46/115 | |
| % 2nd pts | 36% | 41% | 32% | 49% | 40% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 21 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 5/12 | 6/10 | 6/9 | 21/42 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 42% | 60% | 67% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 33 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 3/4 | 4/7 | 7/12 | 20 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 75% | 57% | 58% | 63% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13 | |
| Wang | ||||||
| R1 Doi |
R2 Di Giuseppe |
1/4 Martic |
1/2 Stephens |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | 6-4 6-4 | 7-64 3-6 7-5 | 6-2 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 20 | 34 | 21 | 102 | |
| pts | 121-100 | 81-70 | 121-113 | 84-70 | 407-353 | |
| Total points | 221 | 151 | 234 | 154 | 760 | |
| Winners | 45 | 28 | 34 | 29 | 136 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 35% | 28% | 35% | 33% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 9 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 19 | |
| 1st in | 68/114 | 41/78 | 53/105 | 46/77 | 208/374 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 53% | 50% | 60% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 45/68 | 28/41 | 34/53 | 29/46 | 136/208 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 68% | 64% | 63% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/46 | 15/37 | 30/52 | 17/31 | 83/166 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 41% | 58% | 55% | 50% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 23 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 6/9 | 5/16 | 5/11 | 23/49 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 67% | 31% | 45% | 47% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 17 | 11 | 8 | 52 | |
| Saved | 13/16 | 13/17 | 5/11 | 5/8 | 36 | |
| Saved % | 81% | 76% | 45% | 63% | 66% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 16 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWWWWWWLW
LLLWWLLLWW Tennis Scores in Parma
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas (6-4 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Cori GauffGauff – Qiang WangWang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
