Qiang Wang and Martina Di Giuseppe will play each other in the 2nd round of the Emilia-Romagna Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on Grand Stand Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Qiang Wang who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Qiang Wang is the pick to win this match.
Qiang Wang -> 1.27
Martina Di Giuseppe -> 3.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Qiang Wang vs. Martina Di Giuseppe
There is no head to head record between Qiang Wang and Martina Di Giuseppe since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Qiang Wang
Ranked no. 48, Wang reached the 2nd round after defeating Misaki Doi 6-2 5-7 6-1.
In the 1st round, Qiang defeated Doi (6-2 5-7 6-1). During the match, Wang scored 121 points vs Doi’s 100. The Chinese was very aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wang recorded 9 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Qiang Wang lost the serve 3 times and she saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 60% of her first serves in, winning 66% (45/68) of the points behind her 1st serve and 46% (21/46) on the 2nd serve. Qiang broke Doi 7 times after converting 54% of her break points (7/13).
Wang has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of her matches (295-182). 2-3 on clay in 2021. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Wang has an overall 25-28 record in the last years on clay.
The Chinese has a compiled 5-11 win-loss record in 2021, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Parma
Wang has never competed in this tournament before.
Martina Di Giuseppe
Ranked no. 218, the Italian reached the 2nd round after beating Katarzyna Kawa 4-6 6-4 6-4, Lucia Bronzetti 7-5 6-3 and Nao Hibino 7-5 7-65.
In the 1st round, Di Giuseppe had a good straight sets win against Hibino (7-5 7-65). During the match Di Giuseppe scored 88 points vs Hibino’s 82. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Di Giuseppe scored 5 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Martina Di Giuseppe lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Di Giuseppe put 64% of her first serves in, winning 59% (34/58) of the points behind her 1st serve and 52% (17/33) on the 2nd serve. Di Giuseppe broke Hibino 5 times after converting 56% of her break points (5/9).
Martina has an overall 4-8 win-loss record in 2021, 4-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wang | Di Giuseppe |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 76 |
| Pts | 121-100 | 272-254 |
| Total Points | 221 | 526 |
| Winners | 45 | 102 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Wang played 1 match while Di Giuseppe competed in 3 matches. Di Giuseppe started her run from the qualifications while Wang had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Qiang Wang conceded 1 set, while Martina Di Giuseppe lost 1 set. Wang has played 4 set(s) less than Di Giuseppe (3 vs 7). Therefore, Wang played 49 games less than Di Giuseppe. Qiang scored 45 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Martina made 102 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wang | Di Giuseppe |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 4 |
| 1st in | 68/114 | 160/268 |
| %1st in | 60% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 45/68 | 102/160 |
| %1st pts | 66% | 64% |
| 2nd pts | 21/46 | 46/108 |
| %2nd pts | 46% | 43% |
Wang bagged 9 aces . Di Giuseppe struck 12 aces (4 per match). Wang won 66% points behind her first serve. She was rock solid on her second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Di Giuseppe won 64% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 43% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wang | Di Giuseppe |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 17 |
| Converted | 7/13 | 17/37 |
| % Converted | 54% | 46% |
| Conceded | 16 | 29 |
| Saved | 13 | 16 |
| % Saved | 81% | 55% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 13 |
Qiang broke her opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Qiang surrendered her serve 3 times and she saved 81% of the break points that she conceded. Di Giuseppe broke her opponents 17 times with a 46% conversion rate. Di Giuseppe conceded her serve 13 times and she saved 55% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wang | |||
| R1 Doi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 121-100 | 121-100 | |
| Total points | 221 | 221 | |
| Winners | 45 | 45 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 68/114 | 68/114 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 45/68 | 45/68 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/46 | 21/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 16 | 16 | |
| Saved | 13/16 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 81% | 81% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Di Giuseppe | |||||
| Q1 Kawa |
Q3 Bronzetti |
R1 Hibino |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | 7-5 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 21 | 25 | 76 | |
| pts | 113-114 | 71-58 | 88-82 | 272-254 | |
| Total points | 227 | 129 | 170 | 526 | |
| Winners | 46 | 22 | 34 | 102 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 31% | 39% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 6 | 1 | 5 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| 1st in | 69/116 | 33/61 | 58/91 | 160/268 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 54% | 64% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 46/69 | 22/33 | 34/58 | 102/160 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 67% | 59% | 64% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/47 | 10/28 | 17/33 | 46/108 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 36% | 52% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 7 | 5 | 17 | |
| Converted | 5/17 | 7/11 | 5/9 | 17/37 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 64% | 56% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 7 | 10 | 29 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | 2/7 | 6/10 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 29% | 60% | 156% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 5 | 4 | 13 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWLWWWW
Tennis Scores in Parma
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sloane StephensStephens – Daria KasatkinaKasatkina (1-6 6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Serena WilliamsWilliams (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Danilo PetrovicPetrovic – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gianluca MagerMager – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-4 4-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Laslo DjereDjere – Vaclav SafranekSafranek (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Andrej MartinMartin (6-3 4-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Robin StanekStanek (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Dennis NovakNovak (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Caroline GarciaGarcia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cori GauffGauff – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Sara ErraniErrani (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Qiang WangWang – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Petra MarticMartic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
