Caroline Garcia and Anna-Lena Friedsam will square off in the 2nd round of the Emilia-Romagna Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on Centre Court. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Caroline Garcia who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Caroline Garcia is the pick to win this match.
Caroline Garcia -> 1.7
Anna-Lena Friedsam -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Caroline Garcia vs. Anna-Lena Friedsam
This will be the 2nd time that Caroline Garcia and Anna-Lena Friedsam face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Garcia (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Garcia won 6-4 7-6(8) in the 2nd round in Mallorca back in 2016.
Caroline Garcia
Ranked no. 53, Garcia got to the 2nd round after defeating Paula Ormaechea 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Garcia had a good straight sets win against Ormaechea (6-4 6-4). During the match, Garcia scored 80 points vs Ormaechea’s 70. Garcia was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Garcia bagged 2 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Caroline Garcia lost the serve twice and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Garcia put 67% of her first serves in, winning 57% (24/42) of the points behind her 1st serve and 71% (15/21) on the 2nd serve. Garcia broke Ormaechea 4 times after converting 33% of her break points (4/12).
Garcia has a favorable match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of her matches (295-225). 2-1 on clay in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Garcia has a compiled 80-58 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The French player has an overall 9-8 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Parma
Garcia has never competed in this tournament before.
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Ranked no. 110, Friedsam reached the 2nd round after defeating Asia Muhammad 6-2 6-0, Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove 3-6 7-5 6-2 and Viktorija Golubic 6-4 6-71 6-2.
In the 1st round, The German defeated Golubic (6-4 6-71 6-2). During the match Friedsam scored 114 points vs Golubic’s 107. Friedsam was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
About the serving games, Friedsam scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Anna-Lena Friedsam lost the serve 3 times and she saved 13 break points. Furthermore, Friedsam put 64% of her first serves in, winning 63% (48/76) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (19/42) on the 2nd serve. Anna-Lena broke Golubic 6 times after converting 35% of her break points (6/17).
The German has an overall 10-9 win-loss record in 2021, 7-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Garcia | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 74 |
| Pts | 80-70 | 267-225 |
| Total Points | 150 | 492 |
| Winners | 24 | 109 |
| %Winners | 30% | 41% |
Garcia played 1 match while Friedsam competed in 3 matches. Friedsam started her run from the qualifications while Garcia had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Anna-Lena Friedsam dropped 2 sets while Caroline Garcia hasn’t conceded a set so far. Garcia has played 6 set(s) less than Friedsam (2 vs 8). Therefore, Garcia played 54 games less than Friedsam. Caroline scored 24 winners (30% of the total points). On the other side, Anna-Lena bagged 109 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Garcia | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 2.7 |
| 1st in | 42/63 | 168/254 |
| %1st in | 67% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 24/42 | 109/168 |
| %1st pts | 57% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 41/86 |
| %2nd pts | 71% | 48% |
Garcia fired 2 aces . Friedsam bagged 8 aces (2.7 per match). Garcia won 57% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 71% of the points. On the other side, Friedsam won 65% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Garcia | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 18 |
| Converted | 4/12 | 18/34 |
| % Converted | 33% | 53% |
| Conceded | 8 | 32 |
| Saved | 6 | 23 |
| % Saved | 75% | 72% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 9 |
The French player broke her opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Garcia dropped her serve twice and she saved 75% of the break points that she conceded. The German broke her opponents 18 times with a 53% conversion rate. Anna-Lena conceded her serve 9 times and she saved 72% of the break points that she conceded.
| Garcia | |||
| R1 Ormaechea |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 80-70 | 80-70 | |
| Total points | 150 | 150 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 42/63 | 42/63 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 24/42 | 24/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 57% | 57% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/21 | 15/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 71% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/8 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Friedsam | |||||
| Q1 Muhammad |
Q3 Kerkhove |
R1 Golubic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | 6-4 6-71 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 29 | 31 | 74 | |
| pts | 56-29 | 97-89 | 114-107 | 267-225 | |
| Total points | 85 | 186 | 221 | 492 | |
| Winners | 20 | 41 | 48 | 109 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 42% | 42% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 28/37 | 64/99 | 76/118 | 168/254 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 65% | 64% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 41/64 | 48/76 | 109/168 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 64% | 63% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/9 | 16/35 | 19/42 | 41/86 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 46% | 45% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | 6 | 18 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/7 | 6/17 | 18/34 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 86% | 35% | 53% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 15 | 16 | 32 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 10/15 | 13/16 | 23 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 67% | 81% | 148% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 | 3 | 9 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLWLW
LLLLWWLLWL Tennis Scores in Parma
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Serena WilliamsWilliams (7-64 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Sloane StephensStephens – Daria KasatkinaKasatkina (1-6 6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Robin StanekStanek (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Dennis NovakNovak (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Danilo PetrovicPetrovic – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gianluca MagerMager – Damir DzumhurDzumhur (6-4 4-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Laslo DjereDjere – Vaclav SafranekSafranek (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stefanos TsitsipasTsitsipas – Andrej MartinMartin (6-3 4-6 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Caroline GarciaGarcia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cori GauffGauff – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Sara ErraniErrani (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Qiang WangWang – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Petra MarticMartic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
