Anna-Lena Friedsam and Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove will face off in the qualifications of the Emilia for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 4:00 pm on Court 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Anna-Lena Friedsam who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Anna-Lena Friedsam is the pick to win this match.
Anna-Lena Friedsam -> 1.29
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove -> 3.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Anna-Lena Friedsam vs. Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
This will be the 2nd time that Anna-Lena Friedsam and Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Friedsam (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Friedsam won 6-4 6-2 in the final in the Shrewsbury back in 2017.
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Ranked no. 110, Anna-Lena got to the qualifications after beating Asia Muhammad 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Muhammad (6-2 6-0). During the match Friedsam scored 56 points vs Muhammad’s 29. Anna-Lena was quite aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Friedsam recorded 2 aces and she was exceptionally solid in conceding no double faults. Overall, Anna-Lena Friedsam was extremely effective on serve to win 71% (20/28) of her 1st serve and 67% (6/9) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve once. Friedsam broke Muhammad 6 times after converting 60% of her break points (6/10).
Friedsam has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of her matches (252-151). 5-3 on clay in 2021. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Friedsam has a 79-49 match record in the last years on clay.
The German has a 8-9 win-loss record in 2021, 5-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Romagna Open
Friedsam has never competed in this tournament before.
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Ranked no. 177, Kerkhove reached the qualifications after beating Julia Grabher 7-5 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Grabher (7-5 6-3). During the match Kerkhove scored 72 points vs Grabher’s 54. The Dutch was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Kerkhove blasted 3 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove lost the serve 5 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Kerkhove put 65% of her first serves in, winning 56% (23/41) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Kerkhove broke Grabher 7 times after converting 50% of her break points (7/14).
Kerkhove’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the W25 Potchefstroom.
Lesley has a 10-12 win-loss record in 2021, 1-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Friedsam | Kerkhove |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 21 |
| Pts | 56-29 | 72-54 |
| Total Points | 85 | 126 |
| Winners | 20 | 23 |
| %Winners | 36% | 32% |
Both Friedsam and Kerkhove played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Friedsam and Kerkhove have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Friedsam played 7 games less than Kerkhove. Friedsam scored 20 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, The Dutch bagged 23 winners (32%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Friedsam | Kerkhove |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 28/37 | 41/63 |
| %1st in | 76% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 23/41 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 56% |
| 2nd pts | 6/9 | 10/22 |
| %2nd pts | 67% | 45% |
Friedsam fired 2 aces . Kerkhove blasted 3 aces . Friedsam won 71% points on her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 67% of the points. On the other side, Kerkhove won 56% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Friedsam | Kerkhove |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 7 |
| Converted | 6/10 | 7/14 |
| % Converted | 60% | 50% |
| Conceded | 1 | 7 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 29% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 5 |
Friedsam broke her opponent 6 times with a 60% conversion rate. Friedsam conceded her serve once and she saved 0% of the break points that she conceded. Kerkhove broke her opponent 7 times with a 50% conversion rate. Lesley conceded her serve 5 times and she saved 29% of the break points that she conceded.
| Friedsam | |||
| Q1 Muhammad |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 56-29 | 56-29 | |
| Total points | 85 | 85 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 36% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 28/37 | 28/37 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 20/28 | 20/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 67% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 6/10 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Kerkhove | |||
| Q1 Grabher |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 72-54 | 72-54 | |
| Total points | 126 | 126 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 32% | 32% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 41/63 | 41/63 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 23/41 | 23/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 56% | 56% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/22 | 10/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 2/7 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 29% | 29% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWLLWL
LLWLLLLWLL Tennis Scores in Romagna Open
- Gianluca MagerMager – Lennert Van Der LindenVan Der Linden (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – Rameez JunaidJunaid (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova – Lisa PigatoPigato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caty McNallyMcNally – Katarina ZavatskaZavatska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anna-Lena FriedsamFriedsam – Lesley KerkhoveKerkhove (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucia BronzettiBronzetti – Martina Di GiuseppeDi Giuseppe (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Anna SchmiedlovaSchmiedlova – Rebecca MarinoMarino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova – Clara TausonTauson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arantxa RusRus – Viktorija GolubicGolubic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Cori GauffGauff – Kaia KanepiKanepi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Camila GiorgiGiorgi – Christina MchaleMchale (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jasmine PaoliniPaolini – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Bernarda PeraPera (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ana BogdanBogdan – Sara ErraniErrani (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Su-Wei HsiehHsieh – Darya KasatkinaKasatkina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Qiang WangWang – Misaki DoiDoi (0-5) – H2H and prediction
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Petra MarticMartic (0-2) – H2H and prediction
