Mackenzie Mcdonald and Kimmer Coppejans will face off in the 2nd round of the Heilbronn Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:30 am on COURT 2. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mackenzie Mcdonald who should win in 3 sets.
Mackenzie Mcdonald -> 1.55
Kimmer Coppejans -> 2.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Mackenzie Mcdonald vs. Kimmer Coppejans
This will be the 2nd time that Mackenzie Mcdonald and Kimmer Coppejans play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Mcdonald (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Mcdonald won 6-2 6-2 in the 1st round in the San Francisco Challenger back in 2017.
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Ranked no. 120, Mackenzie got to the 2nd round after beating Aleksandar Vukic 6-3 4-3 ret..
In the 1st round, Mcdonald had a good straight sets win against Vukic (6-3 4-3 ret.). During the match Mcdonald scored 62 points vs Vukic’s 56. Mackenzie was quite aggressive to blast 17 winners.
Regarding the service games, Mcdonald made 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Mackenzie Mcdonald lost the serve twice and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Mcdonald put 51% of his first serves in, winning 61% (17/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 56% (15/27) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Vukic 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Mcdonald has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (209-150). 5-2 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mcdonald has a 11-17 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Mcdonald’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Sultan 1 Challenger.
Mackenzie has a 19-9 win-loss record in 2021, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Heilbronn Challenger
Mcdonald has never competed in this tournament before.
Kimmer Coppejans
Ranked no. 176, Kimmer reached the 2nd round after defeating Carlos Taberner 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round, Kimmer had a good straight sets win against Taberner (6-2 6-1). During the match Coppejans scored 54 points vs Taberner’s 28. Kimmer was pretty aggressive to blast 19 winners.
Talking about serving, Coppejans recorded 6 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Kimmer Coppejans was pretty efficient on serve to win 79% (19/24) of his 1st serve and 75% (15/20) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Belgian broke Taberner 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Kimmer’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Gran Canaria 2 Challenger.
Coppejans has a 11-8 win-loss record in 2021, 8-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mcdonald | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 |
| Pts | 62-56 | 54-28 |
| Total Points | 118 | 82 |
| Winners | 17 | 19 |
| %Winners | 27% | 35% |
Both Mcdonald and Coppejans played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Mcdonald has played 1 set more than Coppejans (3 vs 2). Therefore, Mcdonald played 1 game more than Coppejans. Mcdonald scored 17 winners (27% of the total points). On the other side, Kimmer made 19 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mcdonald | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 6 |
| 1st in | 28/55 | 24/44 |
| %1st in | 51% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 17/28 | 19/24 |
| %1st pts | 61% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/20 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 75% |
Mcdonald struck 7 aces . Coppejans made 6 aces . Mcdonald won 61% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Coppejans won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 75% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mcdonald | Coppejans |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 40% | 57% |
| Conceded | 7 | 1 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 71% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
The American broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Mcdonald lost his serve twice and he saved 71% of the break points that he conceded. Coppejans broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Kimmer was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Mcdonald | |||
| R1 Vukic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 4-3 ret. | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 62-56 | 62-56 | |
| Total points | 118 | 118 | |
| Winners | 17 | 17 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 27% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/55 | 28/55 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 17/28 | 17/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 61% | 61% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/27 | 15/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
| Saved | 5/7 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 71% | 71% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Coppejans | |||
| R1 Taberner | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 54-28 | 54-28 | |
| Total points | 82 | 82 | |
| Winners | 19 | 19 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 24/44 | 24/44 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 19/24 | 19/24 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/20 | 15/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 75% | 75% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Tennis Scores in Heilbronn Challenger
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Ergi KirkinKirkin (7-66 2-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Aleksandar VukicVukic (6-3 4-3 ret.) – See score progression
- Antoine HoangHoang – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-0 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Andrey KuznetsovKuznetsov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Yannick HanfmannHanfmann – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (6-0 6-4) – See score progression
- Mats MoraingMoraing – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (7-62 6-2) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Marc PolmansPolmans (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Philipp KohlschreiberKohlschreiber – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Denis KudlaKudla (7-5 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (6-73 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Taro DanielDaniel – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (7-5 6-0) – See score progression
- Oscar OtteOtte – Jiri VeselyVesely (7-62 7-63) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Illya MarchenkoMarchenko (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Philipp KohlschreiberKohlschreiber – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oscar OtteOtte – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dennis NovakNovak – Yannick MadenMaden (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine HoangHoang – Sumit NagalNagal (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas Martin EtcheverryMartin Etcheverry – Taro DanielDaniel (0-0) – H2H and prediction