Garbine Muguruza and Bernarda Pera will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on Court 2. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Garbine Muguruza who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Garbine Muguruza is the pick to win this match.
Garbine Muguruza -> 1.32
Bernarda Pera -> 3.52
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Garbine Muguruza vs. Bernarda Pera
There is no head to head record between Garbine Muguruza and Bernarda Pera since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Garbine Muguruza
Ranked no. 12, Garbine got to the 2nd round after defeating Patricia Maria Tig 6-1 6-2.
In the 1st round, Muguruza had a good straight sets win against Maria Tig (6-1 6-2). During the match Muguruza scored 55 points vs Maria Tig’s 29. The Spaniard was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Regarding the service games, Muguruza struck 3 aces and she committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Garbine Muguruza was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 72% (21/29) of her 1st serve and 57% (8/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent her to concede the serve twice. Garbine broke Maria Tig 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Muguruza has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 66% of her matches (327-171). 2-1 on clay in 2021. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Muguruza has a 78-39 record in the last years on clay.
Her best result of the season was conquering the title in in Dubai where she beat Barbora Krejcikova in the final 7-6(6) 6-3.
Garbine has a 22-6 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Previously, her best result was reaching the semifinal in 2016, 2017 and 2020. See her history.
Bernarda Pera
Ranked no. 69, Pera got to the 2nd round after defeating Liudmila Samsonova 6-3 6-4, Anastasia Potapova 6-4 6-1 and Tamara Zidansek 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Zidansek (6-3 6-2). During the match Pera scored 64 points vs Zidansek’s 50. Bernarda was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Pera wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Bernarda Pera lost the serve twice and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Pera put 67% of her first serves in, winning 68% (23/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. Bernarda broke Zidansek 6 times after converting 86% of her break points (6/7).
Pera has a 9-9 win-loss record in 2021, 6-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2020. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Muguruza | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 53 |
| Pts | 55-29 | 203-159 |
| Total Points | 84 | 362 |
| Winners | 21 | 66 |
| %Winners | 38% | 33% |
Muguruza played 1 match while Pera competed in 3 matches. Pera started her run from the qualifications while Muguruza had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Muguruza has played 4 set(s) less than Pera (2 vs 6). Therefore, Muguruza played 38 games less than Pera. Garbine scored 21 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Pera made 66 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Muguruza | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 1.7 |
| 1st in | 29/43 | 98/187 |
| %1st in | 67% | 52% |
| 1st pts | 21/29 | 66/98 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 42/89 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 47% |
Muguruza fired 3 aces . Pera recorded 5 aces (1.7 per match). Muguruza won 72% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Pera won 67% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Muguruza | Pera |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 16 |
| Converted | 6/8 | 16/28 |
| % Converted | 75% | 57% |
| Conceded | 3 | 18 |
| Saved | 1 | 11 |
| % Saved | 33% | 61% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 7 |
The Spaniard broke her opponent 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. Garbine conceded her serve twice and she saved 33% of the break points that she conceded. Pera broke her opponents 16 times with a 57% conversion rate. The American conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 61% of the break points that she conceded.
| Muguruza | |||
| R1 Maria Tig |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 55-29 | 55-29 | |
| Total points | 84 | 84 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 29/43 | 29/43 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 21/29 | 21/29 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/14 | 8/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/8 | 6/8 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Pera | |||||
| Q1 Samsonova |
Q3 Potapova |
R1 Zidansek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 6-1 | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 17 | 17 | 53 | |
| pts | 77-68 | 62-41 | 64-50 | 203-159 | |
| Total points | 145 | 103 | 114 | 362 | |
| Winners | 28 | 15 | 23 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 24% | 36% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 5 | 1 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 43/87 | 21/49 | 34/51 | 98/187 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 43% | 67% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 28/43 | 15/21 | 23/34 | 66/98 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 71% | 68% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/44 | 14/28 | 7/17 | 42/89 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 50% | 41% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 6 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 6/11 | 6/7 | 16/28 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 55% | 86% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 | 3 | 18 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 3/6 | 1/3 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 50% | 33% | 161% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLWWWWLLW Tennis Scores in Rome
- Yaroslava ShvedovaShvedova – Martina TrevisanTrevisan (0-6 7-64 7-66) – See score progression
- Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Angelique KerberKerber – Alize CornetCornet (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Bernarda PeraPera – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (7-68 6-2) – See score progression
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Elise MertensMertens (4-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (2-6 7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova – Saisai ZhengZheng (6-2 6-0) – See score progression
- Madison KeysKeys – Sloane StephensStephens (4-6 6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Johanna KontaKonta (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Kristina MladenovicMladenovic – Belinda BencicBencic (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (7-64 6-77 7-5) – See score progression
- Anastasija SevastovaSevastova – Jil TeichmannTeichmann (3-6 6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova – Marta KostyukKostyuk (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Polona HercogHercog (7-66 3-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Petra MarticMartic – Shelby RogersRogers (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Petra KvitovaKvitova – Magda LinetteLinette (1-6 6-0 6-2) – See score progression
- Cori GauffGauff – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (7-5 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Daria KasatkinaKasatkina (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Christina MchaleMchale (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Iga SwiatekSwiatek – Alison RiskeRiske (5-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Qiang WangWang (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Shuai ZhangZhang (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza – Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Johanna KontaKonta (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Marketa VondrousovaVondrousova (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Angelique KerberKerber – Alize CornetCornet (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Ashleigh BartyBarty – Yaroslava ShvedovaShvedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Cori GauffGauff (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Aryna SabalenkaSabalenka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Sofia KeninKenin – Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Iga SwiatekSwiatek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza – Bernarda PeraPera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Elina SvitolinaSvitolina (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina PliskovaPliskova – Anastasija SevastovaSevastova (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva – Petra KvitovaKvitova (3-3) – H2H and prediction
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Angelique KerberKerber – Simona HalepHalep (5-6) – H2H and prediction
- Serena WilliamsWilliams – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Kristina MladenovicMladenovic (5-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Ekaterina AlexandrovaAlexandrova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Naomi OsakaOsaka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
