Sloane Stephens and Tamara Zidansek will face off in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 4:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tamara Zidansek who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tamara Zidansek is the pick to win this match.
Tamara Zidansek -> 1.61
Sloane Stephens -> 2.20
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sloane Stephens vs. Tamara Zidansek
There is no head to head record between Sloane Stephens and Tamara Zidansek since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Sloane Stephens
Ranked no. 51, Stephens got to the qualifications after beating Aliona Bolsova 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Stephens had a good straight sets win against Bolsova (6-3 6-4). During the match Stephens scored 64 points vs Bolsova’s 57. Stephens was very aggressive to blast 16 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stephens couldn’t to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and she was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Sloane Stephens lost the serve 5 times and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Stephens put 59% of her first serves in, winning 53% (16/30) of the points behind her 1st serve and 29% (6/21) on the 2nd serve. Stephens broke Bolsova 8 times after converting 62% of her break points (8/13).
Stephens has a favorable record in the last 10 years having won 59% of her matches (227-160). 5-2 on clay in 2021. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Stephens has a 69-41 record in the last years on clay.
Sloane has a 6-7 win-loss record in 2021, 5-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Previously, her best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2013 and 2018. See her history.
Tamara Zidansek
Ranked no. 80, Tamara got to the qualifications after defeating Bianca Turati 6-1 6-1.
In the qualifications, Tamara had a good straight sets win against Turati (6-1 6-1). During the match Zidansek scored 61 points vs Turati’s 33. Tamara was very aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Zidansek scored just 1 ace during the entire match and she committed only 3 double faults. Tamara Zidansek lost the serve once and she saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Zidansek put 62% of her first serves in, winning 81% (21/26) of the points behind her 1st serve and 44% (7/16) on the 2nd serve. Tamara broke Turati 6 times after converting 43% of her break points (6/14).
Tamara’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in Bogota.
Zidansek has a 14-9 win-loss record in 2021, 9-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Stephens | Zidansek |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 14 |
Pts | 64-57 | 61-33 |
Total Points | 121 | 94 |
Winners | 16 | 21 |
%Winners | 25% | 34% |
Both Stephens and Zidansek played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Stephens and Zidansek have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Stephens played 5 games more than Zidansek. Stephens scored 16 winners (25% of the total points). On the other side, The Slovenian managed to score 21 winners (34%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Stephens | Zidansek |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 1 |
Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
1st in | 30/51 | 26/42 |
%1st in | 59% | 62% |
1st pts | 16/30 | 21/26 |
%1st pts | 53% | 81% |
2nd pts | 6/21 | 7/16 |
%2nd pts | 29% | 44% |
Stephens didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Zidansek recorded 1 ace . Stephens won 53% points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 29% of the points. On the other side, Zidansek won 81% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Stephens | Zidansek |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 6 |
Converted | 8/13 | 6/14 |
% Converted | 62% | 43% |
Conceded | 9 | 2 |
Saved | 4 | 1 |
% Saved | 44% | 50% |
Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Stephens broke her opponent 8 times with a 62% conversion rate. The American dropped her serve 5 times and she saved 44% of the break points that she conceded. The Slovenian broke her opponent 6 times with a 43% conversion rate. Zidansek conceded her serve once and she saved 50% of the break points that she conceded.
Stephens | |||
Q1 Bolsova |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 64-57 | 64-57 | |
Total points | 121 | 121 | |
Winners | 16 | 16 | |
%Winners | 25% | 25% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 30/51 | 30/51 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
1st pts | 16/30 | 16/30 | |
% 1st pts | 53% | 53% | |
2nd pts | 6/21 | 6/21 | |
% 2nd pts | 29% | 29% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 8 | 8 | |
Converted | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
Converted % | 62% | 62% | |
Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
Saved | 4/9 | 4 | |
Saved % | 44% | 44% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Zidansek | |||
Q1 Turati |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 61-33 | 61-33 | |
Total points | 94 | 94 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 34% | 34% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 26/42 | 26/42 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 21/26 | 21/26 | |
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
2nd pts | 7/16 | 7/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/14 | 6/14 | |
Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sloane StephensStephens – Tamara ZidansekZidansek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristina MladenovicMladenovic – Vera ZvonarevaZvonareva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alize CornetCornet – Andrea PetkovicPetkovic (4-3) – H2H and prediction
- Patricia Maria TigMaria Tig – Christina MchaleMchale (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Marta KostyukKostyuk (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Polona HercogHercog (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernarda PeraPera – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Yaroslava ShvedovaShvedova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline GarciaGarcia – Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Elise MertensMertens (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina PliskovaPliskova – Venus WilliamsWilliams (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva – Cori GauffGauff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Camila GiorgiGiorgi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Saisai ZhengZheng – Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – Madison KeysKeys (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alison RiskeRiske – Iga SwiatekSwiatek (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza – Anastasia PavlyuchenkovaPavlyuchenkova (6-1) – H2H and prediction
- Qiang WangWang – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasija SevastovaSevastova – Jil TeichmannTeichmann (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Petra KvitovaKvitova (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Johanna KontaKonta – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Petra MarticMartic – Shelby RogersRogers (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Shuai ZhangZhang (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Jessica PegulaPegula (0-0) – H2H and prediction