Aljaz Bedene and Hugo Dellien will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Internazionali BNL d’Italia for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 3:30 pm on PIETRANGELI. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Aljaz Bedene who should win in 3 sets.
Aljaz Bedene -> 1.45
Hugo Dellien -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Aljaz Bedene vs. Hugo Dellien
This will be the 2nd time that Aljaz Bedene and Hugo Dellien clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Bedene (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Bedene won 4-6 6-2 6-3 in the quarter in Rio de janiero back in 2019.
Aljaz Bedene
Ranked no. 57, Bedene reached the qualifications after beating Gian Marco Moroni 6-2 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Slovenian defeated Marco Moroni (6-2 3-6 6-4). During the match Bedene scored 98 points vs Marco Moroni’s 86. Aljaz was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bedene recorded 9 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Aljaz Bedene lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Bedene put 54% of his first serves in, winning 82% (40/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (18/42) on the 2nd serve. Aljaz broke Marco Moroni 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Bedene has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (302-186). 4-2 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Bedene has a 159-74 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Aljaz has a 10-7 win-loss record in 2021, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Previously, his best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2018. See his history.
Hugo Dellien
Ranked no. 127, Dellien reached the qualifications after defeating Jaume Antoni Munar Clar 6-4 6-1.
In the qualifications, Hugo had a good straight sets win against Munar Clar (6-4 6-1). During the match Dellien scored 58 points vs Munar Clar’s 45. Dellien was pretty aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Dellien was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Hugo Dellien was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 74% (25/34) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Dellien broke Munar Clar 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Bolivian has a 7-9 win-loss record in 2021, 5-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rome
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bedene | Dellien |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 17 |
| Pts | 98-86 | 58-45 |
| Total Points | 184 | 103 |
| Winners | 40 | 25 |
| %Winners | 41% | 43% |
Both Bedene and Dellien played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Aljaz Bedene lost 1 set while Hugo Dellien hasn’t conceded a set so far. Bedene has played 1 set more than Dellien (3 vs 2). Therefore, Bedene played 10 games more than Dellien. Bedene scored 40 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Dellien scored 25 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bedene | Dellien |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 0 |
| 1st in | 49/91 | 34/47 |
| %1st in | 54% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 40/49 | 25/34 |
| %1st pts | 82% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 18/42 | 8/13 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 62% |
Bedene bagged 9 aces . Dellien didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Bedene won 82% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Dellien won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bedene | Dellien |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 40% | 67% |
| Conceded | 10 | 1 |
| Saved | 8 | 1 |
| % Saved | 80% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Aljaz broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Slovenian dropped his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Dellien broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. Hugo was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
| Bedene | |||
| Q1 Marco Moroni | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 98-86 | 98-86 | |
| Total points | 184 | 184 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 49/91 | 49/91 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 40/49 | 40/49 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/42 | 18/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Dellien | |||
| Q1 Munar Clar | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 58-45 | 58-45 | |
| Total points | 103 | 103 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/47 | 34/47 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 25/34 | 25/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Richard GasquetGasquet – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marin CilicCilic – Alexander BublikBublik (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kei NishikoriNishikori – Fabio FogniniFognini (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel EvansEvans – Taylor Harry FritzHarry Fritz (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Guido PellaPella – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- John MillmanMillman – Dusan LajovicLajovic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aljaz BedeneBedene – Hugo DellienDellien (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Benoit PairePaire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic – Felix Auger AliassimeAuger Aliassime (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – David GoffinGoffin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Alex De MinaurDe Minaur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Raul BrancaccioBrancaccio (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laslo DjereDjere – Pablo Carreno-BustaCarreno-Busta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cameron NorrieNorrie – Marco CecchinatoCecchinato (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Tommy PaulPaul – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Gael MonfilsMonfils (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Casper RuudRuud (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Aslan KaratsevKaratsev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Christian GarinGarin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina – Corentin MoutetMoutet (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ugo HumbertHumbert – Jannik SinnerSinner (1-0) – H2H and prediction