Norbert Gombos and Tallon Griekspoor will play each other in the semifinal of the Prague Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 1:30 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Norbert Gombos who should win in 3 sets.
Norbert Gombos -> 1.8
Tallon Griekspoor -> 2.01
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Norbert Gombos vs. Tallon Griekspoor
This will be the 3rd time that Norbert Gombos and Tallon Griekspoor square off. The head to head is 2-0 for Gombos (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they played, Gombos won 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(2) in the 2nd round in the Budapest Challenger back in 2019.
Norbert Gombos
Ranked no. 89, the Slovakian reached the semifinal after beating Henri Laaksonen 6-76 6-4 6-3, Kacper Zuk 6-3 6-71 6-3 and Sumit Nagal 6-4 6-2.
In the quarter, The Slovakian had a good straight sets win against Nagal (6-4 6-2). During the match Gombos scored 72 points vs Nagal’s 53. Norbert was very aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gombos fired 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Norbert Gombos lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Gombos put 63% of his first serves in, winning 76% (28/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 32% (7/22) on the 2nd serve. Norbert broke Nagal 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Gombos started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 2 set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Gombos has a good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (369-273). 7-4 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Gombos has a 162-110 match record in the last years on clay.
Norbert has a 8-10 win-loss record in 2021, 7-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2016. See his history.
Tallon Griekspoor
Ranked no. 143, Tallon got to the semifinal after defeating Lukas Rosol 6-3 6-0, Renzo Olivo 6-3 7-63 and Frederico Ferreira Silva 6-2 6-4.
In the quarter, The Dutch had a good straight sets win against Ferreira Silva (6-2 6-4). During the match Griekspoor scored 64 points vs Ferreira Silva’s 48. Griekspoor was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Griekspoor bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Tallon Griekspoor lost the serve twice and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Griekspoor put 60% of his first serves in, winning 75% (24/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (10/21) on the 2nd serve. Griekspoor broke Ferreira Silva 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Dutch started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this competition to conquer 57% of the points he played.
The Dutch has a 15-10 win-loss record in 2021, 6-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Prague Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the final in 2020. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gombos | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 81 | 55 |
| Pts | 295-256 | 224-170 |
| Total Points | 551 | 394 |
| Winners | 110 | 89 |
| %Winners | 37% | 40% |
Both Gombos and Griekspoor played 3 matches. At the moment, Norbert Gombos dropped 2 sets while Tallon Griekspoor hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gombos has played 2 sets more than Griekspoor (8 vs 6). Therefore, Gombos played 26 games more than Griekspoor. Gombos scored 110 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Griekspoor struck 89 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gombos | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 3.3 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 153/262 | 121/195 |
| %1st in | 58% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 110/153 | 89/121 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 58/109 | 38/74 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 51% |
Gombos managed to score 10 aces (3.3 per match). Griekspoor managed to score 13 aces (4.3 per match). Gombos won 72% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Griekspoor won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gombos | Griekspoor |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 15 | 13 |
| Converted | 15/35 | 13/27 |
| % Converted | 43% | 48% |
| Conceded | 22 | 15 |
| Saved | 16 | 11 |
| % Saved | 73% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 4 |
The Slovakian broke his opponents 15 times with a 43% conversion rate. Norbert surrendered his serve 6 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Tallon broke his opponents 13 times with a 48% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gombos | |||||
| R1 Laaksonen | R2 Zuk | 1/4 Nagal | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-76 6-4 6-3 | 6-3 6-71 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 31 | 18 | 81 | |
| pts | 122-109 | 101-94 | 72-53 | 295-256 | |
| Total points | 231 | 195 | 125 | 551 | |
| Winners | 43 | 39 | 28 | 110 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 39% | 39% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 61/111 | 55/92 | 37/59 | 153/262 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 60% | 63% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 43/61 | 39/55 | 28/37 | 110/153 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 71% | 76% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 29/50 | 22/37 | 7/22 | 58/109 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 59% | 32% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 5 | 6 | 15 | |
| Converted | 4/18 | 5/8 | 6/9 | 15/35 | |
| Converted % | 22% | 63% | 67% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 7 | 9 | 22 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 6/7 | 6/9 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 86% | 67% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | |
| Griekspoor | |||||
| R1 Rosol | R2 Olivo | 1/4 Ferreira Silva | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | 6-3 7-63 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 22 | 18 | 55 | |
| pts | 73-51 | 87-71 | 64-48 | 224-170 | |
| Total points | 124 | 158 | 112 | 394 | |
| Winners | 29 | 36 | 24 | 89 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% | 38% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 2 | 3 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 0 | 3 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 42/67 | 47/75 | 32/53 | 121/195 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | 60% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 29/42 | 36/47 | 24/32 | 89/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 77% | 75% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 16/28 | 10/21 | 38/74 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 57% | 48% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 2 | 5 | 13 | |
| Converted | 6/10 | 2/7 | 5/10 | 13/27 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 29% | 50% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 2 | 3 | 15 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 50% | 33% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Tennis Scores in Prague Challenger
- Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov – Karol Drzewiecki/Kamil MajchrzakDrzewiecki/Kamil Majchrzak (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Norbert GombosGombos – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Oscar OtteOtte (0-0) – H2H and prediction