![Prediction And Head To Head Juan Pablo Varillas Vs. Dimitar Kuzmanov Oewhmeaywe Prediction and head to head Juan Pablo Varillas vs. Dimitar Kuzmanov](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Juan-Pablo-Varillas-vs.-Dimitar-Kuzmanov-oeWHmeAYWE.jpg)
Juan Pablo Varillas and Dimitar Kuzmanov will play each other in the 2nd round of the Biella 5 Challenger for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on CAMPO 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Juan Pablo Varillas who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Juan Pablo Varillas is the pick to win this match.
Juan Pablo Varillas -> 1.74
Dimitar Kuzmanov -> 2.09
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juan Pablo Varillas vs. Dimitar Kuzmanov
This will be the 2nd time that Juan Pablo Varillas and Dimitar Kuzmanov play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Pablo Patino-Samudio (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they fought against each other, Pablo Patino-Samudio won 7-6(3) 6-1 in the quarter in Turkey F15 (Antalya) back in 2017.
Juan Pablo Varillas
Ranked no. 150, Juan got to the 2nd round after beating Alessandro Giannessi 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, The Peruvian had a good straight sets win against Giannessi (6-4 7-5). During the match Pablo Patino-Samudio scored 77 points vs Giannessi’s 67. The Peruvian was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pablo Patino-Samudio recorded 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Juan Pablo Varillas lost the serve 4 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Pablo Patino-Samudio put 61% of his first serves in, winning 69% (27/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (10/25) on the 2nd serve. Juan broke Giannessi 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Pablo Patino-Samudio has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 60% of his matches (272-180). 14-7 on clay in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pablo Patino-Samudio has a 242-155 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
The Peruvian’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Santiago Challenger and the Rome 1 Challenger.
Pablo Patino-Samudio has a 14-7 win-loss record in 2021, 14-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biella 5 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2018 and 2020. See his history.
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Ranked no. 242, Kuzmanov reached the 2nd round after beating Stefano Reitano 2-6 6-2 6-2 and Lorenzo Giustino 6-3 1-6 6-3.
In the 1st round, Kuzmanov defeated Giustino (6-3 1-6 6-3). During the match Kuzmanov and Giustino scored the same amount of points (71). However, the world no. 150 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match. Dimitar was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Kuzmanov scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Dimitar Kuzmanov lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kuzmanov put 66% of his first serves in, winning 62% (33/53) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (11/27) on the 2nd serve. The Bulgarian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Giustino 5 times.
The Bulgarian’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the Zadar Challenger.
Kuzmanov has a 17-9 win-loss record in 2021, 9-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Kuzmanov |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 2 |
Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
Tot Games | 22 | 49 |
Pts | 77-67 | 173-157 |
Total Points | 144 | 330 |
Winners | 27 | 68 |
%Winners | 35% | 39% |
Pablo Patino-Samudio played 1 match while Kuzmanov competed in 2 matches. Kuzmanov started his run from the qualifications while Pablo Patino-Samudio had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Dimitar Kuzmanov surrendered 2 sets while Juan Pablo Varillas hasn’t lost a set so far. Pablo Patino-Samudio has played 4 set(s) less than Kuzmanov (2 vs 6). Therefore, Pablo Patino-Samudio played 27 games less than Kuzmanov. Juan scored 27 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, The Bulgarian blasted 68 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Kuzmanov |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 2 |
Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
1st in | 39/64 | 115/170 |
%1st in | 61% | 68% |
1st pts | 27/39 | 68/115 |
%1st pts | 69% | 59% |
2nd pts | 10/25 | 25/55 |
%2nd pts | 40% | 45% |
Pablo Patino-Samudio struck 4 aces . Kuzmanov bagged 2 aces (1 per match). Pablo Patino-Samudio won 69% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Kuzmanov won 59% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Pablo Patino-Samudio | Kuzmanov |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 12 |
Converted | 6/11 | 12/24 |
% Converted | 55% | 50% |
Conceded | 7 | 26 |
Saved | 3 | 16 |
% Saved | 43% | 62% |
Times Broken | 4 | 10 |
Pablo Patino-Samudio broke his opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Peruvian lost his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded. Kuzmanov broke his opponents 12 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Bulgarian conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded.
Pablo Patino-Samudio | |||
R1 Giannessi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
pts | 77-67 | 77-67 | |
Total points | 144 | 144 | |
Winners | 27 | 27 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 39/64 | 39/64 | |
% 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
1st pts | 27/39 | 27/39 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 10/25 | 10/25 | |
% 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
Conceded | 7 | 7 | |
Saved | 3/7 | 3 | |
Saved % | 43% | 43% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Kuzmanov | |||||
Q1 Reitano |
Q3 Galovic |
R1 Giustino |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 2-6 6-2 6-2 | 6-4 6-2 | 6-3 1-6 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 18 | 25 | 67 | |
pts | 102-86 | – | 71-71 | 173-157 | |
Total points | 188 | 0 | 142 | 330 | |
Winners | 35 | 33 | 68 | ||
%Winners | 34% | NAN% | 46% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 2 | 7 | ||
1st in | 62/90 | / | 53/80 | 115/170 | |
% 1st in | 69% | – | 66% | 68% | |
1st pts | 35/62 | / | 33/53 | 68/115 | |
% 1st pts | 56% | – | 62% | 59% | |
2nd pts | 14/28 | / | 11/27 | 25/55 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | – | 41% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 7 | 5 | 12 | ||
Converted | 7/19 | / | 5/5 | 12/24 | |
Converted % | 37% | – | 100% | 50% | |
Conceded | 14 | 12 | 26 | ||
Saved | 9/14 | 0/ | 7/12 | 16 | |
Saved % | 64% | – | 58% | 122% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 | 10 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Biella 5 Challenger
- Hugo DellienDellien – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-0 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Leonardo MayerMayer – Luca VanniVanni (7-67 6-0) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Joao MenezesMenezes – Pedro SousaSousa (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Viktor GalovicGalovic (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Go SoedaSoeda (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Federico GaioGaio – Paolo LorenziLorenzi (6-73 7-64 6-2) – See score progression
- Hamad MedjedovicMedjedovic – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (7-5 7-64) – See score progression
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Alex BoltBolt (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Hugo GastonGaston (1-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Leonardo MayerMayer – Luca VanniVanni (7-6(7) 6-0) – See score progression
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues AlvesMeligeni Rodrigues Alves (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Hugo DellienDellien – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (6-0 5-7 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Hugo DellienDellien (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Guido AndreozziAndreozzi – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico GaioGaio – Joao DominguesDomingues (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Leonardo MayerMayer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao MenezesMenezes – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zhizhen ZhangZhang – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction