Quentin Halys and Mathias Bourgue will face off in the semifinal of the Split 2 Challenger for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Quentin Halys who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Quentin Halys is the pick to win this match.
Quentin Halys -> 1.72
Mathias Bourgue -> 2.00
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Quentin Halys vs. Mathias Bourgue
This will be the 3rd time that Quentin Halys and Mathias Bourgue face off. The head to head is 1-1 for Halys and Bourgue (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Bourgue won 6-0 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Cassis Challenger back in 2018.
Quentin Halys
Ranked no. 210, Quentin reached the semifinal after beating Daniel Masur 6-3 6-2, Pedro Cachin 6-2 7-62 and Thanasi Kokkinakis 6-3 7-62.
In the quarter, Halys had a good straight sets win against Kokkinakis (6-3 7-62). During the match Halys scored 73 points vs Kokkinakis’s 60. Quentin was exceptionally aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Regarding the service games, Halys bagged 4 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Quentin Halys was extremely efficient on serve to win 78% (42/54) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Quentin broke Kokkinakis twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The French player started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Halys has a favorable win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (252-212). 3-0 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Halys has a 70-66 record in the last years on clay.
Quentin’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Lille Challenger.
Quentin has a 10-6 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Split 2 Challenger
The French player has never competed in this tournament before.
Mathias Bourgue
Ranked no. 217, Bourgue got to the semifinal after beating Mohamed Safwat 3-6 6-2 6-4, Joao Domingues 6-3 6-4 and Mirza Basic 6-4 1-6 7-5.
In the quarter, Bourgue defeated Basic (6-4 1-6 7-5).-88) than Basic. In fact, the world no. 210 won 88 points vs Basic’s. That means that Bourgue was more focused during the important points. Bourgue was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Bourgue was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Mathias Bourgue lost the serve 6 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Bourgue put 67% of his first serves in, winning 62% (40/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 38% (12/32) on the 2nd serve. Bourgue broke Basic 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Bourgue started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 50% of the points he played.
The French player best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Biella 1 Challenger.
Bourgue has a 14-7 win-loss record in 2021, 3-0 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Halys | Bourgue |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 60 | 75 |
| Pts | 204-156 | 243-239 |
| Total Points | 360 | 482 |
| Winners | 104 | 117 |
| %Winners | 51% | 48% |
Both Halys and Bourgue played 3 matches. At the moment, Mathias Bourgue lost 2 sets while Quentin Halys hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Halys has played 2 set(s) less than Bourgue (6 vs 8). Therefore, Halys played 15 games less than Bourgue. The French player scored 104 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Mathias fired 117 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Halys | Bourgue |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3.7 | 1.3 |
| 1st in | 131/190 | 176/243 |
| %1st in | 69% | 72% |
| 1st pts | 104/131 | 117/176 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 28/59 | 27/67 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 40% |
Halys managed to score 11 aces (3.7 per match). Bourgue fired 4 aces (1.3 per match). Halys won 79% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Bourgue won 66% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Halys | Bourgue |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 10 | 12 |
| Converted | 10/17 | 12/26 |
| % Converted | 59% | 46% |
| Conceded | 9 | 25 |
| Saved | 5 | 15 |
| % Saved | 56% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 10 |
Quentin broke his opponents 10 times with a 59% conversion rate. Quentin conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 56% of the break points that he conceded. Mathias broke his opponents 12 times with a 46% conversion rate. The French player conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Halys | |||||
| R1 Masur |
R2 Cachin |
1/4 Kokkinakis |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-2 7-62 | 6-3 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 21 | 22 | 60 | |
| pts | 55-36 | 76-60 | 73-60 | 204-156 | |
| Total points | 91 | 136 | 133 | 360 | |
| Winners | 25 | 37 | 42 | 104 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 49% | 58% | 51% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 5 | 4 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 3 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 31/47 | 46/70 | 54/73 | 131/190 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | 74% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 37/46 | 42/54 | 104/131 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 80% | 78% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/16 | 9/24 | 10/19 | 28/59 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 38% | 53% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/5 | 4/6 | 2/6 | 10/17 | |
| Converted % | 80% | 67% | 33% | 59% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 2/4 | 3/4 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 50% | 75% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
| Bourgue | |||||
| R1 Safwat |
R2 Domingues |
1/4 Basic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 19 | 29 | 75 | |
| pts | 95-90 | 60-52 | 88-97 | 243-239 | |
| Total points | 185 | 112 | 185 | 482 | |
| Winners | 50 | 27 | 40 | 117 | |
| %Winners | 53% | 45% | 45% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 73/90 | 38/56 | 65/97 | 176/243 | |
| % 1st in | 81% | 68% | 67% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 50/73 | 27/38 | 40/65 | 117/176 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 71% | 62% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/17 | 10/18 | 12/32 | 27/67 | |
| % 2nd pts | 29% | 56% | 38% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 12/26 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 60% | 50% | 46% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 1 | 13 | 25 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 0/1 | 7/13 | 15 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 0% | 54% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 | |
Head 2 Head
WWWLWWLLWW
LLLWLWLLWW Tennis Scores in Split 2 Challenger
- Kacper ZukZuk – Aleksandar VukicVukic (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Elias YmerYmer – Cem IlkelIlkel (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Mirza BasicBasic (6-4 1-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Quentin HalysHalys – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (6-3 7-62) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Quentin HalysHalys – Mathias BourgueBourgue (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Kacper ZukZuk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
