Kateryna Bondarenko and Alycia Parks will play each other in the qualifications of the MUSC Health Women’s Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11 am on Court 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kateryna Bondarenko who should win in 3 sets.
Kateryna Bondarenko -> 1.64
Alycia Parks -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kateryna Bondarenko vs. Alycia Parks
There is no head to head record between Kateryna Bondarenko and Alycia Parks since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Kateryna Bondarenko
Ranked no. 242, the Ukrainian reached the qualifications after defeating Kennedy Shaffer 6-1 5-7 6-2.
In the qualifications, Kateryna defeated Shaffer (6-1 5-7 6-2). During the match Bondarenko and Shaffer scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 242 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Regarding the service games, Bondarenko was unable to score even 1 ace and she was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Kateryna Bondarenko conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of her first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind her 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Bondarenko has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of her matches (204-155). 2-2 on clay in 2021. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Bondarenko has a 47-50 record in the last years on clay.
Kateryna has a 7-4 win-loss record in 2021, 2-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in CHARLESTON
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2012, 2015, 2016 and 2017. See her history
.Alycia Parks
Ranked no. 320, Alycia reached the qualifications after beating Varvara Flink 6-3 6-3.
In the qualifications, Alycia had a good straight sets win against Flink (6-3 6-3). During the match Parks and Flink scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 242 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about serving, Parks wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was very steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Alycia Parks conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of her first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind her 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Parks has a 5-4 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in CHARLESTON
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2021. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Bondarenko | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 18 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 0 | 0 |
| Winners | 0 | 0 |
| %Winners | NAN% | NAN% |
Both Bondarenko and Parks played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Kateryna Bondarenko surrendered 1 set while Alycia Parks hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Bondarenko has played 1 set more than Parks (3 vs 2). Therefore, Bondarenko played 9 games more than Parks. Bondarenko scored 0 winners (NAN% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 0 winners (NAN%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Bondarenko | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | NAN% | NAN% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | NAN% | NAN% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | NAN% | NAN% |
Bondarenko didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Parks also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Bondarenko won NAN% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win NAN% of the points. On the other side, Parks won NAN% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win NAN% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Bondarenko | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 0 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | NAN% | NAN% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | NAN% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Ukrainian hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Bondarenko extremely effective on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. On the other side, Alycia hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Alycia was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Bondarenko | |||
| Q1 Shaffer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 5-7 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | – | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | – | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | – | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | NAN% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | – | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Parks | |||
| Q1 Flink | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | – | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | – | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | – | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | NAN% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | – | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Tennis Scores in CHARLESTON
- Robert GallowayGalloway – Anthony PopyrinPopyrin (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Claire LiuLiu – Ellen PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Storm SandersSanders – Kurumi NaraNara (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Kateryna BondarenkoBondarenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriella PricePrice – Grace MinMin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristie AhnAhn – Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Misaki DoiDoi (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – Caty McNallyMcNally (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danka KovinicKovinic – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Coco VandewegheVandeweghe – Lauren DavisDavis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Natalia VikhlyantsevaVikhlyantseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yafan WangWang – Astra SharmaSharma (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christina MchaleMchale – Sara ErraniErrani (2-5) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Magda LinetteLinette (0-0) – H2H and prediction