Kurumi Nara and Storm Sanders will play each other in the qualifications of the MUSC Health Women’s Open for the 2nd time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 11 am on Court 2. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Storm Sanders who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Storm Sanders is the pick to win this match.
Storm Sanders -> 1.81
Kurumi Nara -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kurumi Nara vs. Storm Sanders
This will be the 2nd time that Kurumi Nara and Storm Sanders play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nara (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Nara won 6-3 6-4 in the 2nd round in the Toyota back in 1970.
Kurumi Nara
Ranked no. 162, Kurumi reached the qualifications after defeating Whitney Osuigwe 6-2 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Osuigwe (6-2 6-0). During the match Nara and Osuigwe scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 162 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about the service games, Nara couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was very consistent in conceding no double faults. Kurumi Nara conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of her first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind her 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Nara has a winning record in the last 10 years having won 53% of her matches (255-223). 5-1 on clay in 2021. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this event, Nara has a 43-42 match record in the last years on clay.
Kurumi’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the W25 Fujairah.
Kurumi has a 9-5 win-loss record in 2021, 5-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in CHARLESTON
Previously, her best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2021. See her history.
Storm Sanders
Ranked no. 187 (career high), Storm got to the qualifications after beating Katharina Gerlach 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Gerlach (6-3 6-2). During the match Sanders and Gerlach scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 162 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about serving, Sanders couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Storm Sanders conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of her first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind her 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
The Australian has a 9-4 win-loss record in 2021, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nara | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 17 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 0 | 0 |
| Winners | 0 | 0 |
| %Winners | NAN% | NAN% |
Both Nara and Sanders played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Nara and Sanders have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Nara played 3 games less than Sanders. The Japanese scored 0 winners (NAN% of the total points). On the other side, Storm fired 0 winners (NAN%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nara | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | NAN% | NAN% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | NAN% | NAN% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | NAN% | NAN% |
Nara didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Sanders also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nara won NAN% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win NAN% of the points. On the other side, Sanders won NAN% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win NAN% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nara | Sanders |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 0 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | NAN% | NAN% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | NAN% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Nara hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Kurumi quite strong on her serve as she has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. On the other side, Storm hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Storm was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Nara | |||
| Q1 Osuigwe |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | – | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | – | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | – | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | NAN% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | – | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Sanders | |||
| Q1 Gerlach |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | – | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | – | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | – | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | NAN% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | – | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in CHARLESTON
- Robert GallowayGalloway – Anthony PopyrinPopyrin (6-2 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Claire LiuLiu – Ellen PerezPerez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Storm SandersSanders – Kurumi NaraNara (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – Kateryna BondarenkoBondarenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriella PricePrice – Grace MinMin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ons JabeurJabeur – Stefanie VoegeleVoegele (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kristie AhnAhn – Francesca Di LorenzoDi Lorenzo (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nao HibinoHibino – Misaki DoiDoi (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Shelby RogersRogers – Caty McNallyMcNally (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danka KovinicKovinic – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Coco VandewegheVandeweghe – Lauren DavisDavis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison BrengleBrengle – Natalia VikhlyantsevaVikhlyantseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yafan WangWang – Astra SharmaSharma (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tereza MartincovaMartincova – Emma NavarroNavarro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ajla TomljanovicTomljanovic – Renata ZarazuaZarazua (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Clara TausonTauson – Ludmilla SamsonovaSamsonova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christina MchaleMchale – Sara ErraniErrani (2-5) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Magda LinetteLinette (0-0) – H2H and prediction
