Tung-Lin Wu and Uladzimir Ignatik will play each other in the qualifications of the Split 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 4. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tung-Lin Wu who should win in 3 sets.
Tung-Lin Wu -> 1.65
Uladzimir Ignatik -> 2.18
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Tung-Lin Wu vs. Uladzimir Ignatik
There is no head to head record between Tung-Lin Wu and Uladzimir Ignatik since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Tung-Lin Wu
Ranked no. 248, Wu got to the qualifications after defeating Luka Mikrut 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, Tung-Lin had a good straight sets win against Mikrut (6-2 6-1). During the match Wu scored 65 points vs Mikrut’s 37. The Chinese was pretty aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wu scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he was very steady in conceding no double faults. Tung-Lin Wu lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Wu put 77% of his first serves in, winning 71% (24/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (4/10) on the 2nd serve. The Chinese broke Mikrut 7 times after converting 58% of his break points (7/12).
Wu has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (141-105). 1-1 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Wu has a 19-13 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Wu has a 9-8 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Split 1 Challenger
Wu has never competed in this tournament before.
Uladzimir Ignatik
Ranked no. 356, the Belarussian got to the qualifications after beating Mick Veldheer 6-1 6-3.
In the qualifications, Ignatik had a good straight sets win against Veldheer (6-1 6-3). During the match Ignatik scored 61 points vs Veldheer’s 34. The Belarussian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Ignatik scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Uladzimir Ignatik lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Ignatik put 70% of his first serves in, winning 72% (23/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (7/14) on the 2nd serve. Uladzimir broke Veldheer 6 times after converting 67% of his break points (6/9).
Ignatik has a 4-6 win-loss record in 2021, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wu | Ignatik |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 15 | 16 |
| Pts | 65-37 | 61-34 |
| Total Points | 102 | 95 |
| Winners | 24 | 23 |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% |
Both Wu and Ignatik played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Wu and Ignatik have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Wu played 1 game less than Ignatik. The Chinese scored 24 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Belarussian managed to score 23 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wu | Ignatik |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 34/44 | 32/46 |
| %1st in | 77% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 23/32 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 4/10 | 7/14 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 50% |
Wu made 1 ace . Ignatik also struck 1 ace . Wu won 71% points on his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Ignatik won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wu | Ignatik |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 6 |
| Converted | 7/12 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 58% | 67% |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
The Chinese broke his opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. Wu surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Uladzimir broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Belarussian conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wu | |||
| Q1 Mikrut | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | 65-37 | 65-37 | |
| Total points | 102 | 102 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/44 | 34/44 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 24/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Ignatik | |||
| Q1 Veldheer | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
| pts | 61-34 | 61-34 | |
| Total points | 95 | 95 | |
| Winners | 23 | 23 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 32/46 | 32/46 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 23/32 | 23/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/9 | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Robin HaaseHaase – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Matteo MartineauMartineau (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro SousaSousa – Kacper ZukZuk (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Sebastian OfnerOfner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blaz RolaRola – Dmitry PopkoPopko (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Danilo PetrovicPetrovic – Lukas RosolRosol (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao DominguesDomingues – Maximilian MartererMarterer (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis – Filip HoranskyHoransky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – Alexandre MullerMuller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Akira SantillanSantillan – Miljan ZekicZekic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jay ClarkeClarke – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tung-Lin WuWu – Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Dustin BrownBrown (0-0) – H2H and prediction