Sumit Nagal and Nerman Fatic will clash against each other in the quarter of the Zadar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.4
Nerman Fatic -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Sumit Nagal and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Sumit Nagal
Ranked no. 139, Sumit got to the quarter after beating Nino Serdarusic 7-64 6-4 and Frane Nincevic 6-0 6-1.
In the 2nd round, Sumit had a good straight sets win against Nincevic (6-0 6-1). During the match Nagal scored 55 points vs Nincevic’s 33. Sumit was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nagal scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault. Sumit Nagal was quite efficient on serve to win 71% (22/31) of his 1st serve and 56% (9/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sumit broke Nincevic 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Indian started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this competition to win 55% of the points he played.
Nagal has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (223-129). 7-2 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Nagal has a 147-68 match record in the last 8 years on clay.
Sumit has a 7-4 win-loss record in 2021, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zadar Challenger
The Indian has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
Ranked no. 381, Fatic reached the quarter after defeating Andrey Golubev 6-2 6-3, Ivan Nedelko 4-6 6-1 6-3, Harry Bourchier 6-2 6-4 and Alessandro Giannessi 7-64 5-7 7-66.
In the 2nd round, Fatic defeated Giannessi (7-64 5-7 7-66).-126) than Giannessi. In fact, the world no. 139 won 126 points vs Giannessi’s. That means that Fatic was more focused during the important points. The Bosnian was extremely aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Nerman Fatic lost the serve 9 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Fatic put 75% of his first serves in, winning 55% (51/93) of the points behind his 1st serve and 42% (13/31) on the 2nd serve. Fatic broke Giannessi 8 times after converting 62% of his break points (8/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Nerman started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Fatic has a 7-3 win-loss record in 2021, 7-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 10 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 99 |
| Pts | 128-103 | 340-289 |
| Total Points | 231 | 629 |
| Winners | 66 | 135 |
| %Winners | 52% | 40% |
Nagal played 2 matches while Fatic competed in 4 matches. Fatic started his run from the qualifications while Nagal had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Nerman Fatic conceded 2 sets while Sumit Nagal hasn’t dropped a set so far. Nagal has played 6 set(s) less than Fatic (4 vs 10). Therefore, Nagal played 63 games less than Fatic. Nagal scored 66 winners (52% of the total points). On the other side, The Bosnian bagged 135 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 90/125 | 219/293 |
| %1st in | 72% | 75% |
| 1st pts | 66/90 | 135/219 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 62% |
| 2nd pts | 20/35 | 33/74 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 45% |
Nagal managed to score 2 aces (1 per match). Fatic struck 4 aces (1 per match). Nagal won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 62% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 27 |
| Converted | 6/11 | 27/54 |
| % Converted | 55% | 50% |
| Conceded | 8 | 34 |
| Saved | 8 | 16 |
| % Saved | 100% | 47% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 18 |
Sumit broke his opponents 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Indian extremely effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 8 break points. Fatic broke his opponents 27 times with a 50% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve 18 times and he saved 47% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | ||||
| R1 Serdarusic |
R2 Nincevic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 13 | 36 | |
| pts | 73-70 | 55-33 | 128-103 | |
| Total points | 143 | 88 | 231 | |
| Winners | 44 | 22 | 66 | |
| %Winners | 60% | 40% | 52% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 59/78 | 31/47 | 90/125 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 66% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 44/59 | 22/31 | 66/90 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 71% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 9/16 | 20/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 56% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 5/9 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 56% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 2 | 8 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 2/2 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Fatic | ||||||
| Q1 Golubev |
Q3 Nedelko |
R1 Bourchier |
R2 Giannessi |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-64 5-7 7-66 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 18 | 38 | 99 | |
| pts | 61-41 | 86-72 | 67-49 | 126-127 | 340-289 | |
| Total points | 102 | 158 | 116 | 253 | 629 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | 26 | 51 | 135 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 34% | 39% | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 39/47 | 51/73 | 36/49 | 93/124 | 219/293 | |
| % 1st in | 83% | 70% | 73% | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 29/39 | 29/51 | 26/36 | 51/93 | 135/219 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 57% | 72% | 55% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 3/8 | 10/22 | 7/13 | 13/31 | 33/74 | |
| % 2nd pts | 38% | 45% | 54% | 42% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 5 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 27 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 9/16 | 5/13 | 8/13 | 27/54 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 56% | 38% | 62% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 11 | 4 | 17 | 34 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 5/11 | 2/4 | 8/17 | 16 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 45% | 50% | 47% | 96% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 18 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWWWWWWW
WLLLWLWWWL Tennis Scores in Zadar Challenger
- Blaz Kavcic/Blaz RolaKavcic/Blaz Rola – Duje Kekez/Mili PoljicakKekez/Mili Poljicak (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Blaz KavcicKavcic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Vit KoprivaKopriva (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
