Frane Nincevic and Sumit Nagal will square off in the 2nd round of the Zadar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.087
Frane Nincevic -> 7.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Frane Nincevic vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Frane Nincevic and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Frane Nincevic
Currently unranked, Nincevic got to the 2nd round after defeating Mili Poljicak 4-6 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round against Poljicak, The Croatian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-4 6-3). During the match Nincevic scored 96 points vs Poljicak’s 90. Frane was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nincevic wasn’t able to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 8 double faults. Frane Nincevic lost the serve 5 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Nincevic put 67% of his first serves in, winning 62% (40/65) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (14/32) on the 2nd serve. The Croatian broke Poljicak 6 times after converting 40% of his break points (6/15).
Nincevic has a winning match record in the last 4 years having won 55% of his matches (11-9). 4-2 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Nincevic has a 4-3 win-loss record in the last 4 years on clay.
Frane has a 7-4 win-loss record in 2021, 4-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zadar Challenger
Nincevic has never competed in this tournament before.
Sumit Nagal
Ranked no. 139, Sumit got to the 2nd round after beating Nino Serdarusic 7-64 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Indian had a good straight sets win against Serdarusic (7-64 6-4). During the match Nagal scored 73 points vs Serdarusic’s 70. The Indian was very aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about serving, Nagal scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Sumit Nagal was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 75% (44/59) of his 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Nagal broke Serdarusic once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Nagal has a 6-4 win-loss record in 2021, 6-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nincevic | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 23 |
| Pts | 96-90 | 73-70 |
| Total Points | 186 | 143 |
| Winners | 40 | 44 |
| %Winners | 42% | 60% |
Both Nincevic and Nagal played 1 match. At the moment, Frane Nincevic lost 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t lost a set so far. Nincevic has played 1 set more than Nagal (3 vs 2). Therefore, Nincevic played 6 games more than Nagal. Frane scored 40 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal struck 44 winners (60%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nincevic | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 1 |
| 1st in | 65/97 | 59/78 |
| %1st in | 67% | 76% |
| 1st pts | 40/65 | 44/59 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 11/19 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 58% |
Nincevic didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Nagal struck 1 ace . Nincevic won 62% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nincevic | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 1 |
| Converted | 6/15 | 1/2 |
| % Converted | 40% | 50% |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 |
| Saved | 4 | 6 |
| % Saved | 44% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Nincevic broke his opponent 6 times with a 40% conversion rate. Frane conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 44% of the break points that he conceded. Nagal broke his opponent once with a 50% conversion rate. Sumit was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 6 break points.
| Nincevic | |||
| R1 Poljicak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 96-90 | 96-90 | |
| Total points | 186 | 186 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 65/97 | 65/97 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 40/65 | 40/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/32 | 14/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/15 | 6/15 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 4/9 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 44% | 44% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
| Nagal | |||
| R1 Serdarusic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 73-70 | 73-70 | |
| Total points | 143 | 143 | |
| Winners | 44 | 44 | |
| %Winners | 60% | 60% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 59/78 | 59/78 | |
| % 1st in | 76% | 76% | |
| 1st pts | 44/59 | 44/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 11/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/2 | 1/2 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 6/6 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLLLL Tennis Scores in Zadar Challenger
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Marco BortolottiBortolotti (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Harry BourchierBourchier (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Vladyslav OrlovOrlov (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ivan NedelkoNedelko – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (6-2 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Matija PecoticPecotic (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Tung-Lin WuWu (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Gianluca MagerMager – Igor SijslingSijsling (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Blaz RolaRola (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Frane NincevicNincevic – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Alex MolcanMolcan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Zdenek KolarKolar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Ivan NedelkoNedelko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frane NincevicNincevic – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
