Alessandro Giannessi and Nerman Fatic will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Zadar Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Alessandro Giannessi who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Alessandro Giannessi is the pick to win this match.
Alessandro Giannessi -> 1.45
Nerman Fatic -> 2.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Alessandro Giannessi vs. Nerman Fatic
There is no head to head record between Alessandro Giannessi and Nerman Fatic since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Alessandro Giannessi
Ranked no. 169, Giannessi got to the 2nd round after beating Riccardo Bonadio 7-5 7-5.
In the 1st round, Giannessi had a good straight sets win against Bonadio (7-5 7-5). During the match Giannessi scored 76 points vs Bonadio’s 63. Giannessi was quite aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Regarding the service games, Giannessi struck 4 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Alessandro Giannessi lost the serve 3 times and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Giannessi put 80% of his first serves in, winning 63% (33/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the 2nd serve. Giannessi broke Bonadio 5 times after converting 33% of his break points (5/15).
Giannessi has a positive match record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (262-229). 9-4 on clay in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Giannessi has a 226-177 record in the last years on clay.
Giannessi’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Antalya 2 Challenger.
Giannessi has a 9-7 win-loss record in 2021, 9-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zadar Challenger
Giannessi has never competed in this tournament before.
Nerman Fatic
Ranked no. 381, Fatic reached the 2nd round after beating Andrey Golubev 6-2 6-3, Ivan Nedelko 4-6 6-1 6-3 and Harry Bourchier 6-2 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Bosnian had a good straight sets win against Bourchier (6-2 6-4). During the match Fatic scored 67 points vs Bourchier’s 49. The Bosnian was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Fatic wasn’t able to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Nerman Fatic was very effective on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 54% (7/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Bosnian broke Bourchier 5 times after converting 38% of his break points (5/13).
The Bosnian has a 6-3 win-loss record in 2021, 6-2 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Giannessi | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
Tot Games | 24 | 61 |
Pts | 76-63 | 214-162 |
Total Points | 139 | 376 |
Winners | 33 | 84 |
%Winners | 43% | 39% |
Giannessi played 1 match while Fatic competed in 3 matches. Fatic started his run from the qualifications while Giannessi had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Nerman Fatic surrendered 1 set while Alessandro Giannessi hasn’t lost a set so far. Giannessi has played 5 set(s) less than Fatic (2 vs 7). Therefore, Giannessi played 37 games less than Fatic. Giannessi scored 33 winners (43% of the total points). On the other side, Nerman made 84 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Giannessi | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Aces | 4 | 3 |
Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
1st in | 52/65 | 126/169 |
%1st in | 80% | 75% |
1st pts | 33/52 | 84/126 |
%1st pts | 63% | 67% |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 20/43 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 47% |
Giannessi bagged 4 aces . Fatic scored 3 aces (1 per match). Giannessi won 63% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Fatic won 67% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Giannessi | Fatic |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 19 |
Converted | 5/15 | 19/41 |
% Converted | 33% | 46% |
Conceded | 4 | 17 |
Saved | 1 | 8 |
% Saved | 25% | 47% |
Times Broken | 3 | 9 |
Alessandro broke his opponent 5 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Italian lost his serve 3 times and he saved 25% of the break points that he conceded. Fatic broke his opponents 19 times with a 46% conversion rate. Nerman conceded his serve 9 times and he saved 47% of the break points that he conceded.
Giannessi | |||
R1 Bonadio |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 24 | |
pts | 76-63 | 76-63 | |
Total points | 139 | 139 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 52/65 | 52/65 | |
% 1st in | 80% | 80% | |
1st pts | 33/52 | 33/52 | |
% 1st pts | 63% | 63% | |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/15 | 5/15 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 1/4 | 1 | |
Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Fatic | |||||
Q1 Golubev |
Q3 Nedelko |
R1 Bourchier |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-3 | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 26 | 18 | 61 | |
pts | 61-41 | 86-72 | 67-49 | 214-162 | |
Total points | 102 | 158 | 116 | 376 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | 26 | 84 | |
%Winners | 48% | 34% | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 | |
1st in | 39/47 | 51/73 | 36/49 | 126/169 | |
% 1st in | 83% | 70% | 73% | 75% | |
1st pts | 29/39 | 29/51 | 26/36 | 84/126 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 57% | 72% | 67% | |
2nd pts | 3/8 | 10/22 | 7/13 | 20/43 | |
% 2nd pts | 38% | 45% | 54% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 5 | 9 | 5 | 19 | |
Converted | 5/12 | 9/16 | 5/13 | 19/41 | |
Converted % | 42% | 56% | 38% | 46% | |
Conceded | 2 | 11 | 4 | 17 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 5/11 | 2/4 | 8 | |
Saved % | 50% | 45% | 50% | 145% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Zadar Challenger
- Gianluca MagerMager – Igor SijslingSijsling (6-4 4-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic (7-64 6-4) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Gian Marco MoroniMarco Moroni (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Marco BortolottiBortolotti (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Alexey VatutinVatutin (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Nerman FaticFatic – Harry BourchierBourchier (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Vladyslav OrlovOrlov (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Ivan NedelkoNedelko – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (6-2 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo – Matija PecoticPecotic (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik – Filip HoranskyHoransky (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Tung-Lin WuWu (7-64 6-1) – See score progression
- Michael VrbenskyVrbensky – Enzo CouacaudCouacaud (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Frane NincevicNincevic – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Riccardo BonadioBonadio (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Alex MolcanMolcan – Blaz RolaRola (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Alex MolcanMolcan (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Nerman FaticFatic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Zdenek KolarKolar (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Nikolas Sanchez-IzquierdoSanchez-Izquierdo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nikola MilojevicMilojevic – Ivan NedelkoNedelko (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lukas KleinKlein – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vit KoprivaKopriva – Uladzimir IgnatikIgnatik (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frane NincevicNincevic – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction