Zizou Bergs and Edan Leshem will square off in the qualifications of the Lille Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on CENTRAL. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Zizou Bergs who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Zizou Bergs is the pick to win this match.
Zizou Bergs -> 1.152
Edan Leshem -> 5.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Zizou Bergs vs. Edan Leshem
There is no head to head record between Zizou Bergs and Edan Leshem since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Zizou Bergs
Ranked no. 327 (career high), the Belgian reached the qualifications after beating Cyril Vandermeersch 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications, Bergs had a good straight sets win against Vandermeersch (6-3 6-4). During the match Bergs scored 67 points vs Vandermeersch’s 47. Zizou was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Bergs struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Zizou Bergs was exceptionally effective on serve to win 94% (30/32) of his 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zizou broke Vandermeersch twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Bergs has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 61% of his matches (85-55). 12-2 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Bergs has a 29-14 match record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Bergs’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the St. Petersburg 1 Challenger.
Bergs has a 13-5 win-loss record in 2021, 12-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Lille Challenger
Zizou has never competed in this tournament before.
Edan Leshem
Ranked no. 392, Leshem reached the qualifications after defeating Tobias Simon 6-2 7-66.
In the qualifications, Edan had a good straight sets win against Simon (6-2 7-66). During the match Leshem scored 74 points vs Simon’s 61. Edan was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Leshem bagged 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Edan Leshem conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Leshem put 65% of his first serves in, winning 90% (38/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (9/23) on the 2nd serve. Edan was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Simon twice.
The Israeli has a 5-5 win-loss record in 2021, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Bergs | Leshem |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 19 | 21 |
Pts | 67-47 | 74-61 |
Total Points | 114 | 135 |
Winners | 30 | 38 |
%Winners | 45% | 51% |
Both Bergs and Leshem played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Bergs and Leshem have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Bergs played 2 games less than Leshem. Zizou scored 30 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Israeli scored 38 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Bergs | Leshem |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 4 |
Avg per match | 5 | 4 |
1st in | 32/48 | 42/65 |
%1st in | 67% | 65% |
1st pts | 30/32 | 38/42 |
%1st pts | 94% | 90% |
2nd pts | 11/16 | 9/23 |
%2nd pts | 69% | 39% |
Bergs bagged 5 aces . Leshem recorded 4 aces . Bergs won 94% points on his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Leshem won 90% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Bergs | Leshem |
---|---|---|
Won | 2 | 2 |
Converted | 2/6 | 2/2 |
% Converted | 33% | 100% |
Conceded | 1 | 2 |
Saved | 1 | 2 |
% Saved | 100% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Belgian broke his opponent twice with a 33% conversion rate. Bergs was rock solid on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Israeli broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Leshem was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Bergs | |||
Q1 Vandermeersch |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 67-47 | 67-47 | |
Total points | 114 | 114 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
% 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
1st pts | 30/32 | 30/32 | |
% 1st pts | 94% | 94% | |
2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
% 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/6 | 2/6 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Leshem | |||
Q1 Simon |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 7-66 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
pts | 74-61 | 74-61 | |
Total points | 135 | 135 | |
Winners | 38 | 38 | |
%Winners | 51% | 51% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 4 | 4 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 42/65 | 42/65 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
1st pts | 38/42 | 38/42 | |
% 1st pts | 90% | 90% | |
2nd pts | 9/23 | 9/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andrea ArnaboldiArnaboldi – Manuel GuinardGuinard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Mats MoraingMoraing (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Vaclav SafranekSafranek (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Dustin BrownBrown (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Constant LestienneLestienne (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime HamouHamou – Antoine HoangHoang (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Quentin HalysHalys – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher HeymanHeyman – Jurgen BriandBriand (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Maxime JanvierJanvier – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Baptiste CrepatteCrepatte – Filip Cristian JianuCristian Jianu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Tak Khunn WangKhunn Wang (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zizou BergsBergs – Edan LeshemLeshem (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evan FurnessFurness – Benjamin BonziBonzi (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri – Oscar OtteOtte (0-0) – H2H and prediction