Sergiy Stakhovsky and Daniel Masur will fight against each other in the quarter of the Biella 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Friday at 3:30 pm on PALAPJETTA COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Masur who should win in 3 sets.
Daniel Masur -> 1.57
Sergiy Stakhovsky -> 2.4
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Sergiy Stakhovsky vs. Daniel Masur
There is no head to head record between Sergiy Stakhovsky and Daniel Masur since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Ranked no. 195, Stakhovsky reached the quarter after beating Matteo Gigante 7-5 5-7 6-2 and Marc-Andrea Huesler 7-5 3-6 7-65.
In the 2nd round, Stakhovsky defeated Huesler (7-5 3-6 7-65).-99) than Huesler. In fact, the world no. 195 won 99 points vs Huesler’s. That means that Stakhovsky was more focused during the important points. Sergiy was exceptionally aggressive to blast 49 winners.
Regarding the service games, Stakhovsky made 11 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Overall, Sergiy Stakhovsky was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 86% (49/57) of his 1st serve and 52% (25/48) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Sergiy broke Huesler once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Stakhovsky started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has dropped 2 set in this competition to win 52% of the points he played.
Stakhovsky has a good win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (328-286). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Stakhovsky has a 110-91 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Stakhovsky has a 7-5 win-loss record in 2021, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biella 4 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
Daniel Masur
Ranked no. 249, Daniel got to the quarter after defeating Matija Pecotic 6-0 6-3, Andrea Arnaboldi 7-5 4-6 6-4, Yuichi Sugita 7-64 6-73 6-3 and Jonas Forejtek 7-5 6-74 6-4.
In the 2nd round, Masur defeated Forejtek (7-5 6-74 6-4). During the match Masur scored 125 points vs Forejtek’s 118. Masur was very aggressive to blast 62 winners.
Talking about serving, Masur fired 13 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Daniel Masur lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Masur put 67% of his first serves in, winning 74% (62/84) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (19/41) on the 2nd serve. Daniel broke Forejtek 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has conceded 3 set in the tournament to win 52% of the points he played.
Daniel has a 9-7 win-loss record in 2021, 9-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stakhovsky | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 4 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 11 |
| Tot Games | 66 | 117 |
| Pts | 198-181 | 416-377 |
| Total Points | 379 | 793 |
| Winners | 95 | 199 |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% |
Stakhovsky played 2 matches while Masur competed in 4 matches. Masur started his run from the qualifications while Stakhovsky had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Sergiy Stakhovsky lost 2 sets, while Daniel Masur surrendered 3 sets. Stakhovsky has played 5 set(s) less than Masur (6 vs 11). Therefore, Stakhovsky played 51 games less than Masur. Sergiy scored 95 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel recorded 199 winners (48%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stakhovsky | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 19 | 60 |
| Avg per match | 9.5 | 15 |
| 1st in | 109/188 | 257/411 |
| %1st in | 58% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 95/109 | 199/257 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 77% |
| 2nd pts | 43/79 | 72/154 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 47% |
Stakhovsky recorded 19 aces (9.5 per match). Masur struck 60 aces (15 per match). Stakhovsky won 87% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Masur won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 47% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stakhovsky | Masur |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 13 |
| Converted | 4/9 | 13/37 |
| % Converted | 44% | 35% |
| Conceded | 11 | 28 |
| Saved | 9 | 23 |
| % Saved | 82% | 82% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
The Ukrainian broke his opponents 4 times with a 44% conversion rate. Stakhovsky surrendered his serve twice and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded. The German broke his opponents 13 times with a 35% conversion rate. Masur conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 82% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stakhovsky | ||||
| R1 Gigante | R2 Huesler | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | 7-5 3-6 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 34 | 66 | |
| pts | 99-81 | 99-100 | 198-181 | |
| Total points | 180 | 199 | 379 | |
| Winners | 46 | 49 | 95 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 49% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 8 | 11 | 19 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 52/83 | 57/105 | 109/188 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 54% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 46/52 | 49/57 | 95/109 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 86% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 25/48 | 43/79 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 52% | 54% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 1/2 | 4/9 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 50% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 8 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 7/8 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 88% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Masur | ||||||
| Q1 Pecotic | Q3 Arnaboldi | R1 Sugita | R2 Forejtek | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-3 | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | 7-64 6-73 6-3 | 7-5 6-74 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 32 | 35 | 35 | 117 | |
| pts | 60-40 | 107-106 | 124-113 | 125-118 | 416-377 | |
| Total points | 100 | 213 | 237 | 243 | 793 | |
| Winners | 26 | 49 | 62 | 62 | 199 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 46% | 50% | 50% | 48% | |
| SERVE | ||||||
| Aces | 6 | 17 | 24 | 13 | 60 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 24 | |
| 1st in | 35/54 | 57/100 | 81/132 | 84/125 | 257/411 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 57% | 61% | 67% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 26/35 | 49/57 | 62/81 | 62/84 | 199/257 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 86% | 77% | 74% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/19 | 18/43 | 24/51 | 19/41 | 72/154 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 42% | 47% | 46% | 47% | |
| Breaks | ||||||
| Won | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 3/14 | 3/8 | 3/9 | 13/37 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 21% | 38% | 33% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 6 | 15 | 5 | 28 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 4/6 | 13/15 | 4/5 | 23 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 67% | 87% | 80% | 167% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Matthias BachingerBachinger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-1) – H2H and prediction