Michael Redlicki and Liam Draxl will square off in the 2nd round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 1. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Michael Redlicki who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Michael Redlicki is the pick to win this match.
Michael Redlicki -> 1.88
Liam Draxl -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Michael Redlicki vs. Liam Draxl
There is no head to head record between Michael Redlicki and Liam Draxl since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Michael Redlicki
Ranked no. 400, Redlicki reached the 2nd round after beating James Duckworth 7-611 6-1.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Duckworth (7-611 6-1). During the match Redlicki scored 83 points vs Duckworth’s 71. Redlicki was pretty aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about the service games, Redlicki fired 5 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Michael Redlicki lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Redlicki put 73% of his first serves in, winning 68% (41/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the 2nd serve. The American was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Duckworth 3 times.
Redlicki has a winning win-loss record in the last 7 years having won 59% of his matches (102-72). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Redlicki has a 23-15 record in the last 7 years on indoor hard courts.
Redlicki’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Naples.
Michael has a 5-2 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2019 and 2020. See his history.
Liam Draxl
Ranked no. 887, Liam reached the 2nd round after defeating Roberto Quiroz 7-66 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Canadian had a good straight sets win against Quiroz (7-66 6-4). During the match Draxl scored 90 points vs Quiroz’s 83. The Canadian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about serving, Draxl made 3 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Liam Draxl was very effective on serve to win 79% (33/42) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Canadian broke Quiroz twice after converting 13% of his break points (2/15).
The Canadian has a 1-1 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Liam has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Redlicki | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 23 |
| Pts | 83-71 | 90-83 |
| Total Points | 154 | 173 |
| Winners | 41 | 33 |
| %Winners | 49% | 37% |
Both Redlicki and Draxl played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Redlicki and Draxl have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Redlicki played 3 games less than Draxl. Michael scored 41 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Draxl bagged 33 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Redlicki | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 60/82 | 42/77 |
| %1st in | 73% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 41/60 | 33/42 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 18/35 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 51% |
Redlicki scored 5 aces . Draxl bagged 3 aces . Redlicki won 68% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Draxl won 79% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Redlicki | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 2 |
| Converted | 3/3 | 2/15 |
| % Converted | 100% | 13% |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 |
| Saved | 4 | 3 |
| % Saved | 80% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The American broke his opponent 3 times with a 100% conversion rate. The American dropped his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. The Canadian broke his opponent twice with a 13% conversion rate. Draxl conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Redlicki | |||
| R1 Duckworth |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-611 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 83-71 | 83-71 | |
| Total points | 154 | 154 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 60/82 | 60/82 | |
| % 1st in | 73% | 73% | |
| 1st pts | 41/60 | 41/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 13/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/3 | 3/3 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Draxl | |||
| R1 Quiroz |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 90-83 | 90-83 | |
| Total points | 173 | 173 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 42/77 | 42/77 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 33/42 | 33/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/15 | 2/15 | |
| Converted % | 13% | 13% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLWWWLL Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Evan SongSong (6-3 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (4-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Darian KingKing – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (6-3 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Felix CorwinCorwin (7-60 7-64) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Roy SmithSmith – Nick ChappellChappell (6-4 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Shuichi SekiguchiSekiguchi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Jc AragoneAragone (7-65 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Kevin KingKing (6-4 7-61) – See score progression
- Michael RedlickiRedlicki – James DuckworthDuckworth (7-611 6-1) – See score progression
- Emilio GomezGomez – Evan KingKing (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Roberto QuirozQuiroz (7-66 6-4) – See score progression
- Lucas CatarinaCatarina – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (5-7 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Donald YoungYoung – Go SoedaSoeda (6-3 6-75 7-5) – See score progression
- Brayden SchnurSchnur – Felix CorwinCorwin (7-6(0) 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Emilio GomezGomez – Nicolas MejiaMejia (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bjorn FratangeloFratangelo – Alexander RitschardRitschard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael RedlickiRedlicki – Liam DraxlDraxl (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Darian KingKing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yosuke WatanukiWatanuki – Lucas CatarinaCatarina (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Donald YoungYoung (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Roy SmithSmith (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby – Brayden SchnurSchnur (0-0) – H2H and prediction
