Marc-Andrea Huesler and Sergiy Stakhovsky will play each other in the 2nd round of the Biella 4 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4:00 pm on PALAPJETTA COURT. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marc-Andrea Huesler who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marc-Andrea Huesler is the pick to win this match.
Marc-Andrea Huesler -> 1.63
Sergiy Stakhovsky -> 2.28
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marc-Andrea Huesler vs. Sergiy Stakhovsky
There is no head to head record between Marc-Andrea Huesler and Sergiy Stakhovsky since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Ranked no. 151, the Swiss got to the 2nd round after beating Yasutaka Uchiyama 6-2 7-63.
In the 1st round, Huesler had a good straight sets win against Uchiyama (6-2 7-63). During the match Huesler scored 68 points vs Uchiyama’s 56. Huesler was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Huesler scored 12 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Marc-Andrea Huesler was pretty efficient on serve to win 86% (30/35) of his 1st serve and 56% (18/32) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Huesler was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Uchiyama twice.
Huesler has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 56% of his matches (159-123). 4-4 on indoor hard courts in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Huesler has a 26-28 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Marc-Andrea has a 6-7 win-loss record in 2021, 4-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Biella 4 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021. See his history.
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Ranked no. 195, Stakhovsky reached the 2nd round after beating Matteo Gigante 7-5 5-7 6-2.
In the 1st round, Stakhovsky defeated Gigante (7-5 5-7 6-2). During the match Stakhovsky scored 99 points vs Gigante’s 81. The Ukrainian was quite aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about serving, Stakhovsky blasted 8 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Sergiy Stakhovsky was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 88% (46/52) of his 1st serve and 58% (18/31) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Ukrainian broke Gigante 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Stakhovsky has a 6-5 win-loss record in 2021, 2-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Huesler | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 32 |
| Pts | 68-56 | 99-81 |
| Total Points | 124 | 180 |
| Winners | 30 | 46 |
| %Winners | 44% | 46% |
Both Huesler and Stakhovsky played 1 match. At the moment, Sergiy Stakhovsky surrendered 1 set while Marc-Andrea Huesler hasn’t lost a set so far. Huesler has played 1 set(s) less than Stakhovsky (2 vs 3). Therefore, Huesler played 11 games less than Stakhovsky. Marc-Andrea scored 30 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Stakhovsky bagged 46 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Huesler | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 12 | 8 |
| 1st in | 35/67 | 52/83 |
| %1st in | 52% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 46/52 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 88% |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 18/31 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 58% |
Huesler fired 12 aces . Stakhovsky made 8 aces . Huesler won 86% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Stakhovsky won 88% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Huesler | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 100% | 43% |
| Conceded | 1 | 3 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 100% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Marc-Andrea broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The Swiss very solid his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 1 break points. The Ukrainian broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. Stakhovsky conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Huesler | |||
| R1 Uchiyama |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 68-56 | 68-56 | |
| Total points | 124 | 124 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 35/67 | 35/67 | |
| % 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
| 1st pts | 30/35 | 30/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/32 | 18/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Stakhovsky | |||
| R1 Gigante |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 99-81 | 99-81 | |
| Total points | 180 | 180 | |
| Winners | 46 | 46 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 52/83 | 52/83 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 46/52 | 46/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/31 | 18/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLLWL
Tennis Scores in Biella 4 Challenger
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Nicola KuhnKuhn (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Aleksandar VukicVukic (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Dustin BrownBrown (6-3 6-72 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel MasurMasur – Yuichi SugitaSugita (7-64 6-73 6-3) – See score progression
- Tobias KamkeKamke – Elias YmerYmer (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Flavio CobolliCobolli (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Jurij RodionovRodionov (6-75 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (7-5 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (6-2 7-63) – See score progression
- Bernard TomicTomic – Roberto MarcoraMarcora (7-65 6-1) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Matteo GiganteGigante (7-5 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Stefano NapolitanoNapolitano (7-6(5) 0-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Aleksandar VukicVukic (7-5 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Yannick MadenMaden – Ilya IvashkaIvashka (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Nicola KuhnKuhn (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Matthias BachingerBachinger – Akira SantillanSantillan (7-6(4) 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yannick MadenMaden – Sebastian OfnerOfner (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Bernard TomicTomic – Mathias BourgueBourgue (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Andreas SeppiSeppi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas PouillePouille – Quentin HalysHalys (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel MasurMasur – Jonas ForejtekForejtek (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Tobias KamkeKamke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (0-2) – H2H and prediction
