Kimmer Coppejans and Eduard Esteve Lobato will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Gran Canaria 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kimmer Coppejans who should win in 2 sets.
Kimmer Coppejans -> 1.4
Eduard Esteve Lobato -> 2.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kimmer Coppejans vs. Eduard Esteve Lobato
There is no head to head record between Kimmer Coppejans and Eduard Esteve Lobato since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
The last time that they squared off, Coppejans won 6-4 6-3 in the 1st round in Wimbledon (juniors) back in 2012.
Kimmer Coppejans
Ranked no. 185, the Belgian got to the semifinal after beating Goncalo Oliveira 7-5 7-62, Steven Diez 2-6 6-0 7-5 and Marco Trungelliti 7-64 5-7 6-0.
In the quarter, Coppejans defeated Trungelliti (7-64 5-7 6-0). During the match Coppejans scored 115 points vs Trungelliti’s 104. Coppejans was quite aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Regarding the service games, Coppejans bagged 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Kimmer Coppejans lost the serve 4 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Coppejans put 68% of his first serves in, winning 60% (44/73) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (19/35) on the 2nd serve. Coppejans broke Trungelliti 6 times after converting 55% of his break points (6/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kimmer has dropped 2 set in this competition to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Coppejans has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of his matches (334-225). 4-1 on clay in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Coppejans has a 225-129 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Kimmer has a 7-3 win-loss record in 2021, 4-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Gran Canaria 2 Challenger
Kimmer has never competed in this tournament before.
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Ranked no. 483, Eduard reached the semifinal after defeating Harri Heliovaara 6-2 6-4
, Sandro Ehrat 6-3 2-6 7-63, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez 7-64 6-2, Nikola Milojevic 7-5 6-3 and Giulio Zeppieri 6-4 5-7 6-4.In the quarter, Esteve Lobato defeated Zeppieri (6-4 5-7 6-4). During the match Esteve Lobato scored 115 points vs Zeppieri’s 111. Eduard was pretty aggressive to blast 58 winners.
Talking about serving, Esteve Lobato was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Eduard Esteve Lobato lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Esteve Lobato put 76% of his first serves in, winning 67% (58/87) of the points behind his 1st serve and 52% (14/27) on the 2nd serve. Eduard broke Zeppieri 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Spaniard has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Esteve Lobato has a 5-1 win-loss record in 2021, 5-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Coppejans | Esteve Lobato |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 5 |
Tot Set | 8 | 12 |
Tot Games | 82 | 122 |
Pts | 311-270 | 446-403 |
Total Points | 581 | 849 |
Winners | 127 | 209 |
%Winners | 41% | 47% |
Coppejans played 3 matches while Esteve Lobato competed in 5 matches. Esteve Lobato started his run from the qualifications while Coppejans had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Kimmer Coppejans lost 2 sets, while Eduard Esteve Lobato surrendered 2 sets. Coppejans has played 4 set(s) less than Esteve Lobato (8 vs 12). Therefore, Coppejans played 40 games less than Esteve Lobato. The Belgian scored 127 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Esteve Lobato struck 209 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Coppejans | Esteve Lobato |
---|---|---|
Aces | 10 | 8 |
Avg per match | 3.3 | 1.6 |
1st in | 196/290 | 305/440 |
%1st in | 68% | 69% |
1st pts | 127/196 | 209/305 |
%1st pts | 65% | 69% |
2nd pts | 50/94 | 67/135 |
%2nd pts | 53% | 50% |
Coppejans blasted 10 aces (3.3 per match). Esteve Lobato scored 8 aces (1.6 per match). Coppejans won 65% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Esteve Lobato won 69% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Coppejans | Esteve Lobato |
---|---|---|
Won | 14 | 17 |
Converted | 14/31 | 17/44 |
% Converted | 45% | 39% |
Conceded | 25 | 31 |
Saved | 16 | 21 |
% Saved | 64% | 68% |
Times Broken | 9 | 10 |
The Belgian broke his opponents 14 times with a 45% conversion rate. Coppejans lost his serve 9 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded. Esteve Lobato broke his opponents 17 times with a 39% conversion rate. The Spaniard conceded his serve 10 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded.
Coppejans | |||||
R1 Oliveira | R2 Diez | 1/4 Trungelliti | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-5 7-62 | 2-6 6-0 7-5 | 7-64 5-7 6-0 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
Tot Games | 25 | 26 | 31 | 82 | |
pts | 94-74 | 102-92 | 115-104 | 311-270 | |
Total points | 168 | 194 | 219 | 581 | |
Winners | 33 | 50 | 44 | 127 | |
%Winners | 35% | 49% | 38% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 2 | 5 | 3 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 48/75 | 75/107 | 73/108 | 196/290 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 70% | 68% | 68% | |
1st pts | 33/48 | 50/75 | 44/73 | 127/196 | |
% 1st pts | 69% | 67% | 60% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 17/27 | 14/32 | 19/35 | 50/94 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 44% | 54% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14 | |
Converted | 4/11 | 4/9 | 6/11 | 14/31 | |
Converted % | 36% | 44% | 55% | 45% | |
Conceded | 5 | 10 | 10 | 25 | |
Saved | 2/5 | 8/10 | 6/10 | 16 | |
Saved % | 40% | 80% | 60% | 60% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Esteve Lobato | |||||||
Q1 Heliovaara | Q3 Ehrat | R1 Garcia-Lopez | R2 Milojevic | 1/4 Zeppieri | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-3 2-6 7-63 | 7-64 6-2 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 30 | 21 | 21 | 32 | 122 | |
pts | 63-50 | 106-111 | 85-67 | 77-64 | 115-111 | 446-403 | |
Total points | 113 | 217 | 152 | 141 | 226 | 849 | |
Winners | 27 | 50 | 34 | 40 | 58 | 209 | |
%Winners | 43% | 47% | 40% | 52% | 50% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | |
1st in | 33/57 | 85/121 | 46/62 | 54/86 | 87/114 | 305/440 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 70% | 74% | 63% | 76% | 69% | |
1st pts | 27/33 | 50/85 | 34/46 | 40/54 | 58/87 | 209/305 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 59% | 74% | 74% | 67% | 69% | |
2nd pts | 14/24 | 16/36 | 6/16 | 17/32 | 14/27 | 67/135 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 44% | 38% | 53% | 52% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 4/9 | 5/17 | 2/3 | 3/10 | 17/44 | |
Converted % | 60% | 44% | 29% | 67% | 30% | 39% | |
Conceded | 1 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 31 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 10/15 | 1/4 | 6/6 | 3/5 | 21 | |
Saved % | 100% | 67% | 25% | 100% | 60% | 117% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
Tennis Scores in Gran Canaria 2 Challenger
- Eduard Esteve LobatoEsteve Lobato – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (6-4 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Blaz KavcicKavcic – Alex MolcanMolcan (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (7-64 5-7 6-0) – See score progression
- Eduard Esteve LobatoEsteve Lobato – Giulio ZeppieriZeppieri (6-4 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – Carlos Gimeno ValeroGimeno Valero (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans – Eduard Esteve LobatoEsteve Lobato (0-0) – H2H and prediction