Bethanie Mattek-Sands and Yaroslava Shvedova will square off in the qualifications of the Qatar Total Open for the 3rd time of their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 5:00 pm on Court B. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bethanie Mattek-Sands who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bethanie Mattek-Sands is the pick to win this match.
Bethanie Mattek-Sands -> 1.41
Yaroslava Shvedova -> 2.91
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bethanie Mattek-Sands vs. Yaroslava Shvedova
This will be the 3rd time that Bethanie Mattek-Sands and Yaroslava Shvedova play each other. The head to head is 1-1 for Mattek-Sands and Shvedova (see full H2H stats),but they are 1-1 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, Mattek-Sands won 7-5 7-5 in the 1st round in Indian Wells back in 2010.
Bethanie Mattek-Sands
Ranked no. 299, Bethanie got to the qualifications after defeating Patricia Maria Tig 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, Bethanie had a good straight sets win against Maria Tig (6-3 6-2). During the match Mattek-Sands and Maria Tig scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 299 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Regarding the service games, Mattek-Sands wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and she was quite solid in conceding no double faults. Bethanie Mattek-Sands conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of her first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind her 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
Mattek-Sands has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 52% of her matches (129-120). 2-1 on hard in 2021. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Mattek-Sands has a 74-77 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
Mattek-Sands has a 2-1 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Doha
Mattek-Sands has never competed in this tournament before.
Yaroslava Shvedova
Currently unranked, Yaroslava reached the qualifications after beating Akgul Amanmuradova 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications, The Kazakhstani had a good straight sets win against Amanmuradova (6-3 6-0). During the match Shvedova and Amanmuradova scored the same amount of points (). However, the world no. 299 was stronger during the important points and that was the most significant difference in the match.
Talking about serving, Shvedova couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and she was pretty solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Yaroslava Shvedova conceded no breaks for the entire match to put NAN% of her first serves in, win NAN% (/) of the points behind her 1st serve and NAN% (/) on the 2nd serve.
The Kazakhstani has a 1-3 win-loss record in 2021, 1-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Doha
Previously, her best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2008. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Mattek-Sands | Shvedova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 15 |
| Pts | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Total Points | 0 | 0 |
| Winners | 0 | 0 |
| %Winners | NAN% | NAN% |
Both Mattek-Sands and Shvedova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Mattek-Sands and Shvedova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Mattek-Sands played 2 games more than Shvedova. Mattek-Sands scored 0 winners (NAN% of the total points). On the other side, Shvedova struck 0 winners (NAN%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Mattek-Sands | Shvedova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st in | NAN% | NAN% |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %1st pts | NAN% | NAN% |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| %2nd pts | NAN% | NAN% |
Mattek-Sands didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Shvedova also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Mattek-Sands won NAN% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win NAN% of the points. On the other side, Shvedova won NAN% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win NAN% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Mattek-Sands | Shvedova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 0 | 0 |
| Converted | 0/0 | 0/0 |
| % Converted | NAN% | NAN% |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 |
| Saved | 0 | 0 |
| % Saved | NAN% | NAN% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Bethanie hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Bethanie had a solid display on her serve as she has never dropped a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point. On the other side, Yaroslava hasn’t manged yet to break her opponent. She didn’t manage to even clinch a single break point. Shvedova was rock solid on her serve as she has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points without even conceding a single break point.
| Mattek-Sands | |||
| Q1 Maria Tig |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | – | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | – | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | – | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | NAN% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | – | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
| Shvedova | |||
| Q1 Amanmuradova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
| pts | – | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | NAN% | – | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | – | NAN% | |
| 1st pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | – | NAN% | |
| 2nd pts | / | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | – | NAN% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | / | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | – | NAN% | |
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0/ | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
L
Tennis Scores in Doha
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Matthew MendezMendez (6-1 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jessica PegulaPegula – Anastasia PotapovaPotapova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mirjam BjorklundBjorklund – Misaki DoiDoi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Laura SiegemundSiegemund – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lesya TsurenkoTsurenko – Katerina SiniakovaSiniakova (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bethanie Mattek-SandsMattek-Sands – Yaroslava ShvedovaShvedova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ena ShibaharaShibahara – Anna BlinkovaBlinkova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Barbora KrejcikovaKrejcikova – Cristina BucsaBucsa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lin ZhuZhu – Kristyna PliskovaPliskova (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Saisai ZhengZheng – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Svetlana KuznetsovaKuznetsova – Victoria AzarenkaAzarenka (4-5) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika KudermetovaKudermetova – Garbine MuguruzaMuguruza (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maria SakkariSakkari – Mayar SherifSherif (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Belinda BencicBencic (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jennifer BradyBrady – Anett KontaveitKontaveit (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Angelique KerberKerber – Cagla BuyukakcayBuyukakcay (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kiki BertensBertens – Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko (2-2) – H2H and prediction
