Matteo Viola and Altug Celikbilek will square off in the qualifications of the Singapore Tennis Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 2:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matteo Viola who should win in 3 sets.
Matteo Viola -> 1.66
Altug Celikbilek -> 2.10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Matteo Viola vs. Altug Celikbilek
There is no head to head record between Matteo Viola and Altug Celikbilek since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Matteo Viola
Ranked no. 225, Matteo reached the qualifications after beating Alex Lawson 6-3 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Lawson (6-3 6-2). During the match Viola scored 55 points vs Lawson’s 30. The Italian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Viola managed to score 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Matteo Viola was very efficient on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 69% (11/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Matteo was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Lawson 4 times.
Viola has a winning record in the last 10 years having won 53% of his matches (310-270). 1-1 on hard in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Viola has a 100-61 match record in the last years on hard.
The Italian has a 6-4 win-loss record in 2021, 1-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Singapore
Viola has never competed in this tournament before.
Altug Celikbilek
Ranked no. 299, Celikbilek reached the qualifications after beating Evan King 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Altug had a good straight sets win against King (6-2 6-4). During the match Celikbilek scored 61 points vs King’s 47. Celikbilek was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about serving, Celikbilek fired 6 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Altug Celikbilek lost the serve once and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Celikbilek put 58% of his first serves in, winning 81% (25/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (11/22) on the 2nd serve. The Turk broke King 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
The Turk has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Viola | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 18 |
| Pts | 55-30 | 61-47 |
| Total Points | 85 | 108 |
| Winners | 24 | 25 |
| %Winners | 44% | 41% |
Both Viola and Celikbilek played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Viola and Celikbilek have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Viola played 1 game less than Celikbilek. The Italian scored 24 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Celikbilek bagged 25 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Viola | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 6 |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 31/53 |
| %1st in | 67% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 25/31 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/22 |
| %2nd pts | 69% | 50% |
Viola recorded 2 aces . Celikbilek fired 6 aces . Viola won 75% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 69% of the points. On the other side, Celikbilek won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Viola | Celikbilek |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/12 |
| % Converted | 100% | 33% |
| Conceded | 3 | 4 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 67% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Italian broke his opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Italian lost his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Celikbilek broke his opponent 4 times with a 33% conversion rate. Celikbilek conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Viola | |||
| Q1 Lawson | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 55-30 | 55-30 | |
| Total points | 85 | 85 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 32/48 | 32/48 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/16 | 11/16 | |
| % 2nd pts | 69% | 69% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Celikbilek | |||
| Q1 King | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 61-47 | 61-47 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 25 | 25 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 31/53 | 31/53 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 25/31 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 11/22 | 11/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 4/12 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Malek JaziriJaziri – John-Patrick SmithSmith (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo ViolaViola – Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jason JungJung – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuki BhambriBhambri – Matthew EbdenEbden (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto MarcoraMarcora – Ernests GulbisGulbis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Marc PolmansPolmans (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Taro DanielDaniel – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Robert GallowayGalloway (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher EubanksEubanks – Alessandro BegaBega (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction