Peter Polansky and Tristan Lamasine will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger for the 5th time of their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 10. Here the head to head stats and the relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Lamasine who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Lamasine is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Lamasine -> 1.46
Peter Polansky -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Peter Polansky vs. Tristan Lamasine
This will be the 5th time that Peter Polansky and Tristan Lamasine play each other. The head to head is 3-1 for Polansky (see full H2H stats), 2-1 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Lamasine won 4-6 6-2 7-5 in the 1st round in the Istanbul Challenger back in 2020.
Peter Polansky
Ranked no. 220, the Canadian reached the 1st round after defeating Viktor Galovic 6-2 3-6 7-62.
In the 1st round, Peter defeated Galovic (6-2 3-6 7-62). During the match Polansky scored 97 points vs Galovic’s 91. Peter was extremely aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Polansky scored 18 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Peter Polansky was quite efficient on serve to win 72% (36/50) of his 1st serve and 60% (27/45) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Peter broke Galovic 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Polansky has a winning match record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (316-250). 2-1 on hard in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Polansky has a 196-139 win-loss record in the last years on hard.
The Canadian has a 2-1 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger
The Canadian didn’t play in the Potchefstroom 1 Challenger in 2020.
Tristan Lamasine
Ranked no. 246, the French player reached the 1st round after defeating Vaughn Hunter 7-61 1-6 6-1.
In the 1st round, The French player defeated Hunter (7-61 1-6 6-1). During the match Lamasine scored 87 points vs Hunter’s 78. Tristan was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Lamasine struck 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Tristan Lamasine was extremely efficient on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 5 times. The French player broke Hunter 5 times after converting 42% of his break points (5/12).
Lamasine has a 5-3 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Polansky | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 27 |
| Pts | 97-91 | 87-78 |
| Total Points | 188 | 165 |
| Winners | 36 | 26 |
| %Winners | 37% | 30% |
Both Polansky and Lamasine played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Peter Polansky dropped 1 set, while Tristan Lamasine lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Polansky and Lamasine have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Polansky played 3 games more than Lamasine. The Canadian scored 36 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Lamasine made 26 winners (30%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Polansky | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 18 | 5 |
| 1st in | 50/95 | 36/71 |
| %1st in | 53% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 36/50 | 26/36 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 72% |
| 2nd pts | 27/45 | 18/35 |
| %2nd pts | 60% | 51% |
Polansky managed to score 18 aces . Lamasine made 5 aces . Polansky won 72% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Lamasine won 72% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Polansky | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 5 |
| Converted | 3/9 | 5/12 |
| % Converted | 33% | 42% |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 0 |
| % Saved | 67% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 5 |
Polansky broke his opponent 3 times with a 33% conversion rate. Polansky surrendered his serve twice and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. The French player broke his opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. Lamasine conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Polansky | |||
| R1 Galovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 97-91 | 97-91 | |
| Total points | 188 | 188 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 18 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 50/95 | 50/95 | |
| % 1st in | 53% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 36/50 | 36/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 27/45 | 27/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Lamasine | |||
| R1 Hunter |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-61 1-6 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 87-78 | 87-78 | |
| Total points | 165 | 165 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 30% | 30% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 36/71 | 36/71 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/5 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWLWLL Tennis Scores in Potchefstroom 1 Challenger
- Cem IlkelIlkel – Jenson BrooksbyBrooksby (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Prajnesh GunneswaranGunneswaran (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mirza BasicBasic – Zdenek KolarKolar (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Nick ChappellChappell – Nicola KuhnKuhn (6-1 2-6 7-63) – See score progression
- Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng – Akira SantillanSantillan (6-1 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Adrian Menendez-MaceirasMenendez-Maceiras – Teimuraz GabashviliGabashvili (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Julien CagninaCagnina – Khololwam MontsiMontsi (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Jay ClarkeClarke (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit – Ryan PenistonPeniston (4-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Robbie ArendsArends (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Vaughn HunterHunter (7-61 1-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Viktor GalovicGalovic (6-2 3-6 7-62) – See score progression
- Pedja KrstinKrstin – Roberto Cid SuberviCid Subervi (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (7-65 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin BonziBonzi – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter PolanskyPolansky – Tristan LamasineLamasine (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto QuirozQuiroz – Benjamin BonziBonzi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov – Elliot BenchetritBenchetrit (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Liam BroadyBroady – Brayden SchnurSchnur (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nick ChappellChappell – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julien CagninaCagnina – Cem IlkelIlkel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedja KrstinKrstin – Mirza BasicBasic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ulises BlanchBlanch – Chun Hsin TsengHsin Tseng (0-0) – H2H and prediction
