Peter Gojowczyk and Bernabe Zapata Miralles will clash against each other in the semifinal of the Quimper 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 5:30 pm on CENTRAL. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernabe Zapata Miralles who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernabe Zapata Miralles is the pick to win this match.
Bernabe Zapata Miralles -> 1.58
Peter Gojowczyk -> 2.38
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Peter Gojowczyk vs. Bernabe Zapata Miralles
There is no head to head record between Peter Gojowczyk and Bernabe Zapata Miralles since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Peter Gojowczyk
Ranked no. 151, Peter got to the semifinal after defeating Filip Horansky 6-2 4-0 ret., Arthur Rinderknech 7-5 6-72 6-3 and Maxime Janvier 6-4 6-2.
In the quarter, Gojowczyk had a good straight sets win against Janvier (6-4 6-2). During the match Gojowczyk scored 65 points vs Janvier’s 52. Gojowczyk was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gojowczyk scored 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Peter Gojowczyk was quite effective on serve to win 86% (25/29) of his 1st serve and 62% (13/21) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The German broke Janvier 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The German has surrendered 1 set in this event to conquer 52% of the points he played.
Gojowczyk has a good match record in the last 10 years having won 54% of his matches (251-216). 3-1 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gojowczyk has a 71-44 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
The German has a 3-2 win-loss record in 2021, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper 2 Challenger
Gojowczyk didn’t play in the Quimper 2 Challenger in 2020.
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Ranked no. 153, Bernabe got to the semifinal after beating Denis Kudla 6-2 6-3, Benjamin Bonzi 3-6 7-5 6-3 and Tobias Kamke 6-2 6-2.
In the quarter, The Spaniard had a good straight sets win against Kamke (6-2 6-2). During the match Zapata Miralles scored 78 points vs Kamke’s 56. The Spaniard was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Zapata Miralles recorded 4 aces and he was exceptionally consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Bernabe Zapata Miralles was very effective on serve to win 76% (29/38) of his 1st serve and 61% (11/18) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Zapata Miralles broke Kamke 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Zapata Miralles has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Zapata Miralles has a 3-2 win-loss record in 2021, 3-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gojowczyk | Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 52 | 63 |
| Pts | 165-154 | 230-187 |
| Total Points | 319 | 417 |
| Winners | 70 | 101 |
| %Winners | 42% | 44% |
Gojowczyk played 2 matches while Zapata Miralles competed in 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Peter Gojowczyk dropped 1 set, while Bernabe Zapata Miralles dropped 1 set. Gojowczyk has played 2 set(s) less than Zapata Miralles (5 vs 7). Therefore, Gojowczyk played 11 games less than Zapata Miralles. Peter scored 70 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Bernabe managed to score 101 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gojowczyk | Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 12 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 87/165 | 134/195 |
| %1st in | 53% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 70/87 | 101/134 |
| %1st pts | 80% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 41/78 | 36/61 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 59% |
Gojowczyk bagged 12 aces (6 per match). Zapata Miralles recorded 12 aces (4 per match). Gojowczyk won 80% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Zapata Miralles won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gojowczyk | Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 10 |
| Converted | 7/16 | 10/31 |
| % Converted | 44% | 32% |
| Conceded | 12 | 9 |
| Saved | 10 | 7 |
| % Saved | 83% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Gojowczyk broke his opponents 7 times with a 44% conversion rate. Gojowczyk lost his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Bernabe broke his opponents 10 times with a 32% conversion rate. Zapata Miralles conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gojowczyk | |||||
| R1 Horansky |
R2 Rinderknech |
1/4 Janvier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 4-0 ret. | 7-5 6-72 6-3 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 12 | 34 | 18 | 64 | |
| pts | 46-23 | 100-102 | 65-52 | 211-177 | |
| Total points | 69 | 202 | 117 | 388 | |
| Winners | 15 | 45 | 25 | 85 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 45% | 38% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 4 | 8 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 8 | 3 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 17/31 | 58/115 | 29/50 | 104/196 | |
| % 1st in | 55% | 50% | 58% | 53% | |
| 1st pts | 15/17 | 45/58 | 25/29 | 85/104 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 78% | 86% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/14 | 28/57 | 13/21 | 51/92 | |
| % 2nd pts | 71% | 49% | 62% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | 3/9 | 11/23 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | 33% | 48% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 10 | 2 | 13 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 8/10 | 2/2 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 80% | 100% | 93% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Zapata Miralles | |||||
| R1 Kudla |
R2 Bonzi |
1/4 Kamke |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 30 | 16 | 63 | |
| pts | 68-48 | 84-83 | 78-56 | 230-187 | |
| Total points | 116 | 167 | 134 | 417 | |
| Winners | 26 | 46 | 29 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 55% | 37% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 32/53 | 64/86 | 38/56 | 134/195 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 74% | 68% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 26/32 | 46/64 | 29/38 | 101/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 72% | 76% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 15/22 | 11/18 | 36/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 68% | 61% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 2/8 | 4/13 | 10/31 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 25% | 31% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 3/4 | 4/4 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 75% | 100% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLWLLL Tennis Scores in Quimper 2 Challenger
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-71 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Lukas LackoLacko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
