Brandon Nakashima and Lukas Lacko will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Quimper 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:00 pm on CENTRAL. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Nakashima who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Nakashima is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Nakashima -> 1.176
Lukas Lacko -> 4.95
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Nakashima vs. Lukas Lacko
There is no head to head record between Brandon Nakashima and Lukas Lacko since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Brandon Nakashima
Ranked no. 157 (career high), Nakashima got to the semifinal after beating Antoine Cornut-Chauvinc 6-3 6-3, Evan Furness 6-72 6-3 6-1 and Maximilian Marterer 6-71 6-2 6-4.
In the quarter against Marterer, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-71 6-2 6-4). During the match Nakashima scored 95 points vs Marterer’s 81. The American was quite aggressive to blast 45 winners.
Talking about the service games, Nakashima struck 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Brandon Nakashima was quite efficient on serve to win 80% (45/56) of his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The American broke Marterer 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Brandon has surrendered 2 set in this competition to conquer 56% of the points he played.
Nakashima has a solid record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (73-38). 7-2 on indoor hard courts in 2021. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Nakashima has a 20-9 win-loss record in the last 6 years on indoor hard courts.
Nakashima’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Quimper Challenger.
The American has a 7-3 win-loss record in 2021, 7-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Last year in the Quimper 2 Challenger
The American didn’t compete in the Quimper 2 Challenger in 2020.
Lukas Lacko
Ranked no. 200, Lacko got to the semifinal after beating Mathias Bourgue 6-2 6-2, Arthur Cazaux w/o and Federico Gaio 6-3 7-5.
In the quarter, Lukas had a good straight sets win against Gaio (6-3 7-5). During the match Lacko scored 80 points vs Gaio’s 58. Lukas was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about serving, Lacko recorded 8 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Lukas Lacko was quite effective on serve to win 92% (34/37) of his 1st serve and 59% (13/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Lacko broke Gaio twice after converting 25% of his break points (2/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lacko hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 58% of the points he played.
Lacko has a 2-2 win-loss record in 2021, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nakashima | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 78 | 37 |
| Pts | 261-206 | 135-99 |
| Total Points | 467 | 234 |
| Winners | 108 | 53 |
| %Winners | 41% | 39% |
Nakashima played 3 matches while Lacko competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Brandon Nakashima surrendered 2 sets while Lukas Lacko hasn’t lost a set so far. Nakashima has played 4 sets more than Lacko (8 vs 4). Therefore, Nakashima played 41 games more than Lacko. The American scored 108 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Lacko fired 53 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nakashima | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 5.5 |
| 1st in | 139/211 | 58/105 |
| %1st in | 66% | 55% |
| 1st pts | 108/139 | 53/58 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 91% |
| 2nd pts | 46/72 | 26/47 |
| %2nd pts | 64% | 55% |
Nakashima struck 15 aces (5 per match). Lacko managed to score 11 aces (5.5 per match). Nakashima won 78% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 64% of the points. On the other side, Lacko won 91% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nakashima | Lacko |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 6 |
| Converted | 12/29 | 6/17 |
| % Converted | 41% | 35% |
| Conceded | 5 | 2 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 60% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Nakashima broke his opponents 12 times with a 41% conversion rate. The American lost his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. Lukas broke his opponents 6 times with a 35% conversion rate. The Slovakian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Nakashima | |||||
| R1 Cornut-Chauvinc |
R2 Furness |
1/4 Marterer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-3 | 6-72 6-3 6-1 | 6-71 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 29 | 31 | 78 | |
| pts | 62-43 | 104-82 | 95-81 | 261-206 | |
| Total points | 105 | 186 | 176 | 467 | |
| Winners | 23 | 40 | 45 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 38% | 47% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |
| 1st in | 29/46 | 54/83 | 56/82 | 139/211 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 65% | 68% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 23/29 | 40/54 | 45/56 | 108/139 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 74% | 80% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 18/29 | 15/26 | 46/72 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 62% | 58% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 5/11 | 4/9 | 12/29 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 45% | 44% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 2/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 50% | 67% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Lacko | |||||
| R1 Bourgue |
R2 Cazaux |
1/4 Gaio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-2 | w/o | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 0 | 21 | 37 | |
| pts | 55-41 | – | 80-58 | 135-99 | |
| Total points | 96 | 0 | 138 | 234 | |
| Winners | 19 | 34 | 53 | ||
| %Winners | 35% | NAN% | 43% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 0 | 8 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 1st in | 21/46 | / | 37/59 | 58/105 | |
| % 1st in | 46% | – | 63% | 55% | |
| 1st pts | 19/21 | / | 34/37 | 53/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | – | 92% | 91% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/25 | / | 13/22 | 26/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | – | 59% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 2 | 6 | ||
| Converted | 4/9 | / | 2/8 | 6/17 | |
| Converted % | 44% | – | 25% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Saved | 0/0 | 0/ | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | – | – | 100% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLLWLW
Tennis Scores in Quimper 2 Challenger
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Maximilian MartererMarterer (6-71 6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lukas LackoLacko – Federico GaioGaio (6-3 7-5) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Tobias KamkeKamke (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Maxime JanvierJanvier (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Peter GojowczykGojowczyk – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Lukas LackoLacko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
