
Kamil Majchrzak and Botic Van De Zandschulp will square off in the 2nd round of the Great Ocean Road Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 4.30 pm on COURT 12. Here you can find the head to head analysis and the prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.92
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.92
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kamil Majchrzak vs. Botic Van De Zandschulp
There is no head to head record between Kamil Majchrzak and Botic Van De Zandschulp since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Kamil Majchrzak
Ranked no. 109, the Pole reached the 2nd round after defeating Laslo Djere 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Kamil had a good straight sets win against Djere (6-3 6-4). During the match Majchrzak scored 63 points vs Djere’s 51. The Pole was very aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about the service games, Majchrzak blasted 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Kamil Majchrzak conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 5 break points. Furthermore, Majchrzak put 75% of his first serves in, winning 75% (39/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (8/17) on the 2nd serve. Kamil was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Djere twice.
Majchrzak has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 63% of his matches (278-165). 1-0 on hard in 2021. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Majchrzak has a 50-32 record in the last 9 years on hard.
Kamil has a 1-0 win-loss record in 2021, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Melbourne
Kamil didn’t play in Melbourne in 2020.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranked no. 159, Van De Zandschulp reached the 2nd round after beating Tristan Schoolkate 6-4 7-5.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Schoolkate (6-4 7-5). During the match Van De Zandschulp scored 73 points vs Schoolkate’s 66. Van De Zandschulp was exceptionally aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about serving, Van De Zandschulp made 4 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 64% of his first serves in, winning 65% (30/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (15/26) on the 2nd serve. The Dutch broke Schoolkate 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
The Dutch has a 4-0 win-loss record in 2021, 4-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Last year in Melbourne
The Dutch lost in the qualifications to Constant Lestienne.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Majchrzak | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 22 |
| Pts | 63-51 | 73-66 |
| Total Points | 114 | 139 |
| Winners | 39 | 30 |
| %Winners | 62% | 41% |
Both Majchrzak and Van De Zandschulp played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Majchrzak and Van De Zandschulp have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Majchrzak played 3 games less than Van De Zandschulp. Kamil scored 39 winners (62% of the total points). On the other side, Van De Zandschulp recorded 30 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Majchrzak | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 4 |
| 1st in | 52/69 | 46/72 |
| %1st in | 75% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | 30/46 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 65% |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 15/26 |
| %2nd pts | 47% | 58% |
Majchrzak recorded 6 aces . Van De Zandschulp scored 4 aces . Majchrzak won 75% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Van De Zandschulp won 65% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Majchrzak | Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 4/6 |
| % Converted | 100% | 67% |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
The Pole broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. Kamil had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 5 break points. Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent 4 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Majchrzak | |||
| R1 Djere |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 63-51 | 63-51 | |
| Total points | 114 | 114 | |
| Winners | 39 | 39 | |
| %Winners | 62% | 62% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 52/69 | 52/69 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 75% | |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | 39/52 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/17 | 8/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 47% | 47% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Schoolkate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-66 | 73-66 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 46/72 | 46/72 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 30/46 | 30/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/26 | 15/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/6 | 4/6 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWLWLWW
LLWLWLWLWL Tennis Scores in Melbourne
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – John-Patrick SmithSmith (6-3 5-7 6-4) – See score progression
- Dane SweenySweeny – Ji Sung NamSung Nam (7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Robin HaaseHaase – Kimmer CoppejansCoppejans (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Hugo DellienDellien (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Gianluca MagerMager (4-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Attila BalazsBalazs (2-2 ret.) – See score progression
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-75 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Pablo CuevasCuevas – Pablo AndujarAndujar (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Maxime CressyCressy (6-72 7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Matthew EbdenEbden – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (4-6 7-65 6-0) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (5-7 6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Yen-Hsun LuLu (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Aljaz BedeneBedene – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Andreas SeppiSeppi (7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Feliciano LopezLopez (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Soon-Woo KwonKwon – Andrej MartinMartin (6-3 6-75 7-64) – See score progression
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (2-6 7-5 7-62) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Laslo DjereDjere (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – Norbert GombosGombos (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Matthew EbdenEbden – Federico DelbonisDelbonis (6-3 7-6(6)) – See score progression
- Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Henri LaaksonenLaaksonen (4-6 7-6(5) 6-0) – See score progression
- Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky – Roman SafiullinSafiullin (6-7(5) 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe – Hugo DellienDellien (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sam QuerreyQuerrey – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robin HaaseHaase – Pablo CuevasCuevas (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Kevin AndersonAnderson – Cedrik-Marcel StebeStebe (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew EbdenEbden – Thiago Moura MonteiroMoura Monteiro (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aljaz BedeneBedene – Dane SweenySweeny (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David GoffinGoffin – Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Salvatore CarusoCaruso – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Alexander BublikBublik (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mario Vilella MartinezVilella Martinez – Nikoloz BasilashviliBasilashvili (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Sergiy StakhovskyStakhovsky (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Jannik SinnerSinner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (0-0) – H2H and prediction







